Efficacy of a Non-Pharmacological Intervention in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from allergic rhinitis seek for several therapeutic symptomatic options, including nonconventional treatments, to control their symptoms. OBJECTIVES: Through the present proof-of-concept study, we prospectively investigated the potential role of Puressentiel® nasal protection spray (SNPA) in patients suffering from cypress pollen allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In 15 adults, we performed two nasal provocation tests, with a cypress pollen extract, with a 15-day interval, with and without previous randomized administration of SNPA, and evaluated a nasal symptom score, the nasal inspiratory peak flow, and the concentration of inflammatory cytokines in the nasal lavage after the procedures. RESULTS: Comparing results in patients challenged with and without the SNPA spray before the nasal challenge, we found a 57% mean decrease in symptoms, and a 62% average difference in inspiratory peak flow, after the use of the spray. CONCLUSIONS: Puressentiel® SNPA is effective in reducing nasal symptoms, as assessed by nasal symptoms score and nasal inspiratory peak flow, and could be a valid natural non-pharmacological option in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis.

Effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe refractory asthma: Clinical and histopathologic correlations.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) has been reported in patients with severe asthma, yet its effect on different bronchial structures remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the effect of BT on bronchial structures and to explore the association with clinical outcome in patients with severe refractory asthma. METHODS: Bronchial biopsy specimens (n = 300) were collected from 15 patients with severe uncontrolled asthma before and 3 months after BT. Immunostained sections were assessed for airway smooth muscle (ASM) area, subepithelial basement membrane thickness, nerve fibers, and epithelial neuroendocrine cells. Histopathologic findings were correlated with clinical parameters. RESULTS: BT significantly improved asthma control and quality of life at both 3 and 12 months and decreased the numbers of severe exacerbations and the dose of oral corticosteroids. At 3 months, this clinical benefit was accompanied by a reduction in ASM area (median values before and after BT, respectively: 19.7% [25th-75th interquartile range (IQR), 15.9% to 22.4%] and 5.3% [25th-75th IQR], 3.5% to 10.1%, P < .001), subepithelial basement membrane thickening (4.4 µm [25th-75th IQR, 4.0-4.7 µm] and 3.9 µm [25th-75th IQR, 3.7-4.6 µm], P = 0.02), submucosal nerves (1.0 ‰ [25th-75th IQR, 0.7-1.3 ‰] immunoreactivity and 0.3 ‰ [25th-75th IQR, 0.1-0.5 ‰] immunoreactivity, P < .001), ASM-associated nerves (452.6 [25th-75th IQR, 196.0-811.2] immunoreactive pixels per mm2 and 62.7 [25th-75th IQR, 0.0-230.3] immunoreactive pixels per mm2, P = .02), and epithelial neuroendocrine cells (4.9/mm2 [25th-75th IQR, 0-16.4/mm2] and 0.0/mm2 [25th-75th IQR, 0-0/mm2], P = .02). Histopathologic parameters were associated based on Asthma Control Test scores, numbers of exacerbations, and visits to the emergency department (all P ≤ .02) 3 and 12 months after BT. CONCLUSION: BT is a treatment option in patients with severe therapy-refractory asthma that downregulates selectively structural abnormalities involved in airway narrowing and bronchial reactivity, particularly ASM, neuroendocrine epithelial cells, and bronchial nerve endings.

Bronchial thermoplasty: a new therapeutic option for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma in adults.

Bronchial thermoplasty is a young yet promising treatment for severe asthma whose benefit for long-term asthma control outweighs the short-term risk of deterioration and hospitalisation in the days following the treatment. It is an innovative treatment whose clinical efficacy and safety are beginning to be better understood. Since this is a device-based therapy, the overall evaluation of risk-benefit is unlike that of pharmaceutical products; safety aspects, regulatory requirements, study design and effect size assessment may be unfamiliar. The mechanisms of action and optimal patient selection need to be addressed in further rigorous clinical and scientific studies. Bronchial thermoplasty fits in perfectly with the movement to expand personalised medicine in the field of chronic airway disorders. This is a device-based complimentary asthma treatment that must be supported and developed in order to meet the unmet needs of modern severe asthma management. The mechanisms of action and the type of patients that benefit from bronchial thermoplasty are the most important challenges for bronchial thermoplasty in the future.

Telithromycin in the treatment of pneumococcal community-acquired respiratory tract infections: a review.

OBJECTIVES: A pooled analysis of 14 Phase III studies was performed to establish the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy of telithromycin 800 mg once daily in the treatment of pneumococcal community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs). METHODS: Data were examined from 5534 adult/adolescent patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), or acute bacterial sinusitis, who had received telithromycin for 5-10 days or a comparator antibacterial. RESULTS: Streptococcus pneumoniae was identified in 704/2060 (34.2%) bacteriologically evaluable patients. The respective per-protocol clinical cure rates for telithromycin and comparators were 94.3% and 90.0% (CAP); 81.5% and 78.9% (AECB); 90.1% and 87.5% (acute sinusitis); 92.7% and 87.6% (all indications). Clinical cure rates were 28/34 (82.4%) and 5/7, respectively, for penicillin-resistant infections, and 44/52 (84.6%) and 11/14, respectively, for erythromycin-resistant infections. Of 82 patients with pneumococcal bacteremia, 74 (90.2%) were clinically cured after telithromycin treatment, including 5/7 and 8/10 with penicillin- or erythromycin-resistant strains, respectively. Adverse events considered possibly related to study medication were reported by 1071/4045 (26.5%) telithromycin and 505/1715 (29.4%) comparator recipients. These events were generally of mild/moderate severity, and mainly gastrointestinal in nature. CONCLUSIONS: As S. pneumoniae is the leading bacterial cause of community-acquired RTIs, and antibacterial resistance is increasing among this species, these findings support the use of telithromycin as first-line therapy in this setting.

Influence of sociodemographic factors on quality of life during pollen season in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) is an important outcome in asthma and seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), and its determinants are imperfectly understood. More specifically, the influence of sociodemographic factors on QOL in patients with SAR has been so far little investigated. OBJECTIVE: To examine the changes of QOL during the pollen season in patients with isolated SAR or SAR associated with asthma. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in southern France. Outpatients aged 18 to 60 years and regularly treated by respiratory physicians for SAR (with or without associated asthma) were identified. Patients were recruited before the grass or ragweed pollination period. At peak pollination, patients completed the French versions of the Mini Rhino-conjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-RQLQ) and the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). RESULTS: A total of 135 patients was included, 83 with isolated SAR and 52 with associated asthma (mean age, 35.4 years; SD, 10.6 years; 56% female). At pollen peak, QOL scores were lower in women for all instruments, with significant effects on SF-12 MCS and PCS scores in multivariate analyses. Likewise, a university-level education was an independent predictor of higher SF-12 PCS and MCS scores. Patients who lived in rural areas had significantly poorer QOL at pollen peak, as measured by the mini-RQLQ (P = .002) and SF-12 PCS (P = .008). No influence of age, presence of an animal at home, or smoking status could be identified on any QOL scores. CONCLUSIONS: Being a woman, living in the countryside, and having a lower education level were all independent predictors of poorer QOL of SAR patients. These factors must be taken into account when interpreting QOL of patients with SAR. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Association between asthma and rhinitis according to atopic sensitization in a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Although asthma and rhinitis often occur together, the reason for this common comorbidity is still a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether the coexistence of asthma and rhinitis could be explained by common risk factors. METHODS: International cross-sectional study of representative samples of young adults, who completed a detailed questionnaire and underwent lung function tests, bronchoprovocation challenge, IgE measurements, and skin prick tests. RESULTS: In all countries, asthma and bronchial hyperreactivity were more frequent in subjects with rhinitis than in those without (odds ratio [OR], 6.63; 95% CI, 5.44-8.08; and OR, 3.02 95% CI, 2.66-3.43, respectively). Seventy-four percent to 81% of subjects with asthma reported rhinitis, depending on sensitization to specific allergens. Conversely, the risk of asthma increased from 2.0% in subjects without rhinitis to 6.7% in subjects with rhinitis only when exposed to pollen, 11.9% in subjects with rhinitis when exposed to animals, and 18.8% in subjects with rhinitis either when exposed to pollen or to animals. The association between rhinitis and asthma remained significant after adjustment for total IgE, parental history of asthma, and allergen sensitization (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 2.75-4.2 suggesting that the coexistence of asthma and rhinitis is not solely due to atopic predisposition to these 2 diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were some variations in the association between asthma and rhinitis according to sensitization to individual allergens, the strong association between asthma and rhinitis was not fully explained by shared risk factors, including atopy. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that rhinitis might increase the risk of asthma.