Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 40(4): 303-313, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28336284

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the evolution of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) following supplementation with various macular formulations obtained with the Visucam® 200, and to study the factors affecting MPOD measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-masked multicenter study, patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (patients without retinal pathology who underwent cataract surgery 1 month previously) and group B (patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration [AMD] in one eye). In each group, half of the patients were randomly assigned to receive a food supplementation either with or without carotenoids (5mg of Lutein and 1mg of Zeaxanthin). Outcome measures included MPOD responses obtained with the Visucam® 200 for one year. RESULTS: In total, 126 subjects (52 men, 74 women) with a mean age of 75.3±7.61 years were enrolled. Mean MPOD values at the time of inclusion were statistically lower in group A (0.088 density unit [DU]) compared to group B (0.163 DU, P<0.05). No statistically significant increase in MPOD was noted in either group, even after discontinuation of the supplementation. By multiple regression analysis, age, female gender, lens status and the presence of AMD seemed to significantly affect MPOD measurements. CONCLUSION: No significant improvement in MPOD seems to be detected with the Visucam® 200 after carotenoid supplementation. The MPOD measurement seems to be highly affected by cataract extraction and the presence of AMD.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline/diagnostic imaging , Lens, Crystalline/pathology , Lutein/administration & dosage , Macular Degeneration/diet therapy , Macular Pigment/analysis , Optical Imaging , Zeaxanthins/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cataract Extraction , Dietary Supplements , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Lens, Crystalline/metabolism , Macula Lutea/drug effects , Macula Lutea/metabolism , Macula Lutea/pathology , Macular Degeneration/diagnosis , Macular Degeneration/pathology , Macular Degeneration/surgery , Macular Pigment/metabolism , Male , Optical Imaging/instrumentation , Optical Imaging/methods , Visual Acuity/drug effects
2.
J Trauma ; 40(5): 679-85; discussion 685-7, 1996 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8614064

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been shown to cause a depression of mesenteric blood flow (MBF) and redistribution of blood flow away from the mesenteric vascular bed. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether two commonly used vasoactive agents, dopamine, a known mesenteric vasodilator and inotrope, and dobutamine, with its inotropic properties, would correct the MBF depression caused by PEEP. DESIGN, MATERIAL, AND METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats, 180 to 250 g, were treated with mechanical ventilation and either no PEEP (control group) or increasing levels (0, 10, 15, and 20 cm of H2O pressure) of PEEP (PEEP group). Also, we evaluated PEEP's effect on MBF and cardiac output (CO) under the influence of a continuous infusion of 2.5 or 12.5 microgram/kg/min of dopamine or 2.5 or 12.5 microgram/kg/min of dobutamine. Cardiac output and, using in vivo videomicroscopy, mesenteric A1, A2, and A3 arteriolar intraluminal radii and A1 arteriolar optical Doppler velocities were measured. After 20 cm of H2O pressure PEEP was attained, two boluses of 2 mL of 0.9 normal saline were given. The MBF was calculated from vessel radius and red blood cell velocity. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant changes from baseline in mean arterial pressure or A2 or A3 diameters in any of the groups. Both MBF and CO were unchanged over time in the control group. The MBF was reduced 78% (p < 0.05) and the CO was reduced 31% (p < 0.05) from baseline at 20 cm of H2O pressure PEEP. After 4 mL of normal saline, the MBF was still 53% below baseline (p < 0.05), while the CO had returned to baseline in the PEEP group. Low-dose dopamine partially ameliorated both the decrease in CO and MBF caused by PEEP, but 4 mL of normal saline was required in addition to the low-dose dopamine to return MBF to baseline levels while on 20 cm of H2O pressure PEEP. High-dose dopamine with the addition of 4 mL of normal saline returned CO to baseline on 20 cm of H2O pressure PEEP, but MBF remained approximately 46% below baseline despite fluid boluses. Neither low-dose nor high-dose dobutamine, with or without fluid boluses, had an appreciable positive effect on CO or MBF. CONCLUSIONS: It is clear that inotropes are not a replacement for adequate fluid loading to correct the depression in cardiac output and mesenteric blood flow associated with the use of mechanical ventilation and PEEP. Low-dose dopamine may serve as an adjunct to adequate fluid resuscitation to improve MBF.


Subject(s)
Cardiotonic Agents/pharmacology , Dobutamine/pharmacology , Dopamine/pharmacology , Ischemia/drug therapy , Positive-Pressure Respiration/adverse effects , Splanchnic Circulation/drug effects , Vasodilator Agents/pharmacology , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Cardiac Output/drug effects , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Ischemia/etiology , Male , Microcirculation/drug effects , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL