Survival outcomes in patients aged 75 years and over with peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): multicenter study of the Spanish Group of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery (GECOP).

BACKGROUND: The attitude toward cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC in peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study is to report the perioperative outcomes after cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC in patients ≥ 75 years. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study collected the data the Spanish Group of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery. Thirty-six patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer met the selection criteria for the study. Morbidity, mortality, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Morbidity (grade III-IV) was 17% and 2 patients died of complications related to the procedure (5.4%). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 16 months. DFS at 1 and 3 years was 81% and 42%, respectively. Overall survival at 1 and 3 years was 96% and 75%. In the univariate analysis, preoperative comorbidities (p = 0.01), liver metastases (p = 0.02), blood transfusion (p = 0.001) and postoperative complications (p = 0.001); and in the multivariate analysis, perioperative blood transfusion (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.95-6.24, p = 0.03) and postoperative complications (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.35-7.56, p = 0.02) were associated with a lower overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Age is not an absolute contraindication to perform cytoreduction surgery with HIPEC in highly selected elderly patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Evaluación de la disección ganglionar en colectomía oncológica realizada por cirujanos generales / Evaluation of lymph node dissection in oncological colectomy performed by general surgeons

Resumen Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal es la cuarta patología neoplásica en incidencia y mortalidad en Colombia y, aunque hay evidente mejoría en sus desenlaces, este alto volumen hace indispensable la participación integrada de cirujanos colorrectales y cirujanos generales dedicados a esa área de interés. A la fecha es la cirugía el pilar del tratamiento de esta enfermedad, la cual debe ser realizada dentro de unos parámetros que permitan asegurarle al paciente la resección completa de la misma. Uno de estos parámetros incluye un adecuado vaciamiento ganglionar que nos permite evaluar el pronóstico de la enfermedad y la necesidad de terapias complementarias. Objetivo: Evaluar la calidad de la disección ganglionar en la cirugía oncológica colorrectal efectuada por cirujanos generales en dos instituciones de la ciudad de Bogotá. Materiales y Método: Estudio observacional analítico de corte transversal; se analizaron 315 pacientes llevados a cirugía electiva oncológica colorrectal por cirujanos generales en el periodo de 2014 a 2017 en nuestras instituciones. Resultados: La mediana de ganglios linfáticos recuperados fue de 16, el número de ganglios disecados se asoció con localización del tumor (p = 0,002) y la neoadyuvancia (p = 00,001). Sin embargo, no se encontró asociación con el sexo, tipo de abordaje y volumen de sangrado. Conclusiones: Las colectomías realizadas por cirujanos generales mantienen un volumen óptimo en relación a la disección ganglionar sin comprometer el resto de los desenlaces. El número de ganglios linfáticos recuperados se asoció con la localización del tumor y la terapia neoadyuvante.

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is the 4th neoplastic disease in terms of incidence and mortality in Colombia, even though the clinical outcomes are improving. The high volume of this patients is requesting the collaboration between colorectal surgeons and general surgeons dedicated to this area of interest. To date is surgery the mainstay of the treatment of this disease which should be carried out within parameters that allow to assure the patient the complete resection of the lesion. One of these parameters includes a suitable lymph node emptying that allows us to evaluate the prognosis of the disease and the need of complementary therapies. Aim: To evaluate the quality of the lymph node dissection in colorectal surgery performed by general surgeons in two academic institutions in Bogota, Colombia. Materials and Method: Transversal cohort in analytical and observational study. We analyzed 315 patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery by general surgeons in the period from 2014 to 2017 in our institutions. Results: The mean of the lymph node recovered was 16, the number of dissected lymph nodes was associated with the tumor location (p = 0.002), and the neoadjuvant (p = 0.001). However, no association within sex, approach and bleeding was found. Conclusions: The colectomies performed by general surgeons maintain an optimal volume in relation with lymph node dissection without affect the remaining clinical outcomes. The number of lymph nodes recovered is associated with tumor location and neoadjuvant therapy.

HIPECT4: multicentre, randomized clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of Hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with Mitomycin C used during surgery for treatment of locally advanced colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Local relapse and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) for pT4 colon cancer is estimated in 15,6% and 36,7% for 12 months and 36 months from surgical resection respectively, achieving a 5 years overall survival of 6%. There are promising results using prophylactic HIPEC in this group of patients, and it is estimated that up to 26% of all T4 colon cancer could benefit from this treatment with a minimal morbidity. Adjuvant HIPEC is effective to avoid the possibility of peritoneal seeding after surgical resection. Taking into account these results and the cumulative experience in HIPEC use, we will lead a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant treatment with HIPEC vs. standard treatment in patients with colon cancer at high risk of peritoneal recurrence (pT4). METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant HIPEC in preventing the development of PC in patients with colon cancer with a high risk of peritoneal recurrence (cT4). This study will be carried out in 15 Spanish HIPEC centres. Eligible for inclusion are patients who underwent curative resection for cT4NxM0 stage colon cancer. After resection of the primary tumour, 200 patients will be randomized to adjuvant HIPEC followed by routine adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in the experimental arm, or to systemic chemotherapy only in the control arm. Adjuvant HIPEC will be performed simultaneously after the primary resection. Mitomycin C will be used as chemotherapeutic agent, for 60 min at 42-43 °C. Primary endpoint is loco-regional control (LC) in months and the rate of loco-regional control (%LC) at 12 months and 36 months after resection. DISCUSSION: We assumed that adjuvant HIPEC will reduce the expected absolute risk of peritoneal recurrence from 36% to 18% at 36 months for T4 colon-rectal carcinoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02614534 ( clinicaltrial.gov ) Nov-2015.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei and appendix tumours in elderly patients: Is it justified?

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for pseudomyxoma peritonei and appendix tumours are widespread in the world. It is unclear what should be the attitude in elderly patients. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study collected the database from ten Spanish centers from Spanish Group of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery. The study period was between November 2002 and March 2014. Seventeen patients with age greater than or equal to 75 years with peritoneal carcinomatosis from pseudomyxoma peritonei and appendix tumours met the selection criteria for the study. Outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality such as disease-free and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Median PCI was 16 (range 6-39). Ten postoperative adverse events were detected in nine patients (44.4%). 28% were grade I-II and 17% were grade III-IV. Disease-free survival at 1 and 3 years was 67 and 44%, respectively. Overall survival at 1 and 3 years was 100 and 88%, respectively. Only cytoreduction was related to worst disease free survival after univariate (p = 0.007) and multivariate (OR 11.639, 95% CI 1.24-109.74, p = 0.03) analyses. Cytoreduction was related to the worst overall survival after univariate analysis (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for pseudomyxoma peritonei and appendix tumours in elderly patients it is a procedure with feasible postoperative morbi-mortality and survival outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: researchregistry1587 (retrospectively registered).

Morbidity and mortality outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients aged 75 years and over: Spanish group of peritoneal cancer surgery (GECOP) multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report the perioperative outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients ≥75 years from a Spanish multi-institutional experience. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected clinical data from 10 Spanish hospitals that are part of the Spanish Group Peritoneal Cancer Surgery (GECOP). We assessed postoperative morbidity rates and performed univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with overall (grade I-IV) and major (grade III-IV) postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients aged ≥75 years were included. Forty six postoperative adverse events were detected in 37 patients (43.5%). Twenty five complications in 20 patients (23.5%) were mild (grade I-II) and 16 complications in 12 patients (14.1%) were moderate-severe (grade III-IV). Five patients died in the first 90 days after the procedure (5.9%). After multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with postoperative complications were: PCI> 12 (OR: 4.14, 95% CI 1.22-14.12, p = 0.043) and the need for perioperative blood transfusion (OR: 14.91, 95% CI 3.87-57.46, p < 0.001). Regarding grade III-IV complications, after multivariate analysis, the presence of preoperative albumin levels <3.5 mgr/dl (OR: 9.15, 95% CI 1.38-60.57, p = 0.017), need for diaphragmatic peritonectomy procedures (OR: 11.32, 95% CI 1.40-91.32, p = 0.023) and perioperative blood transfusion (OR: 8.58, 95% CI 1.44-51.16, p = 0.018) were independent factors. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery and performing HIPEC by experienced groups in selected patients aged ≥75 years can be performed with morbidity and mortality similar to that described in the literature.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal origin

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common form of tumour metastasis stemming from gastrointestinal and colorectal cancers. For a long time, PC has been considered a terminal clinical condition treated only with palliative systemic chemotherapy and associated with very limited results. During the last decade, the treatment of advanced colorectal disease has greatly improved with the emergence of new chemotherapy drugs and biological agents. However, the median survival rates still do not surpass 24 months, even though most of these studies correspond to groups of patients with metastatic disease to the liver and/or lung. The approach and development of cytoreductive radical surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are based on performing radical surgery of the entire visible tumour within the abdomen/peritoneum, followed immediately by HIPEC, which acts upon microscopic tumour that remains present after surgery and which is responsible for the persistence or relapse of peritoneal disease. Peritonectomy procedures are demanding surgical techniques that permit elimination of the tumour present in the peritoneal lining and any other organs and/or structures that are infiltrated. The synergistic effect of hyperthermia and chemotherapy has been well documented. Hyperthermia increases the cytotoxicity of some cytostatic agents and increases the penetration of certain drugs into the neoplastic cells. The prognosis for patients with PC who undergo combined treatment correlates with the volume of PC (tumour burden) measured as the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and the ability to perform a CRS, to completely eliminate the gross tumour. At least one phase III study and an important number of phase II studies have shown that CRS + HIPEC provides important survival benefits for patients with PC of colorectal origin. The combination of CRS + HIPEC is indicated for patients with good general health, a low PCI, absence of extra-abdominal metastasis and who can, technically, undergo CRS. The early identification of this group of patients, rapid referral to centres specialised in CRS + HIPEC, together with the correct application of this treatment, are key in achieving the best results (AU)

No disponible

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal origin.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common form of tumour metastasis stemming from gastrointestinal and colorectal cancers. For a long time, PC has been considered a terminal clinical condition treated only with palliative systemic chemotherapy and associated with very limited results. During the last decade, the treatment of advanced colorectal disease has greatly improved with the emergence of new chemotherapy drugs and biological agents. However, the median survival rates still do not surpass 24 months, even though most of these studies correspond to groups of patients with metastatic disease to the liver and/or lung. The approach and development of cytoreductive radical surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are based on performing radical surgery of the entire visible tumour within the abdomen/peritoneum, followed immediately by HIPEC, which acts upon microscopic tumour that remains present after surgery and which is responsible for the persistence or relapse of peritoneal disease. Peritonectomy procedures are demanding surgical techniques that permit elimination of the tumour present in the peritoneal lining and any other organs and/or structures that are infiltrated. The synergistic effect of hyperthermia and chemotherapy has been well documented. Hyperthermia increases the cytotoxicity of some cytostatic agents and increases the penetration of certain drugs into the neoplastic cells. The prognosis for patients with PC who undergo combined treatment correlates with the volume of PC (tumour burden) measured as the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and the ability to perform a CRS, to completely eliminate the gross tumour. At least one phase III study and an important number of phase II studies have shown that CRS + HIPEC provides important survival benefits for patients with PC of colorectal origin. The combination of CRS + HIPEC is indicated for patients with good general health, a low PCI, absence of extra-abdominal metastasis and who can, technically, undergo CRS. The early identification of this group of patients, rapid referral to centres specialised in CRS + HIPEC, together with the correct application of this treatment, are key in achieving the best results.