ABSTRACT
The initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells at the onset of S phase requires the origin recognition complex (ORC) [1]. This six-subunit complex, first isolated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [2], is evolutionarily conserved [1]. ORC participates in the formation of the prereplicative complex [3], which is necessary to establish replication competence. The ORC-DNA interaction is well established for autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) elements in yeast in which the ARS consensus sequence [4] (ACS) constitutes part of the ORC binding site [2, 5]. Little is known about the ORC-DNA interaction in metazoa. For the Drosophila chorion locus, it has been suggested that ORC binding is dispersed [6]. We have analyzed the amplification origin (ori) II/9A of the fly, Sciara coprophila. We identified a distinct 80-base pair (bp) ORC binding site and mapped the replication start site located adjacent to it. The binding of ORC to this 80-bp core region is ATP dependent and is necessary to establish further interaction with an additional 65-bp of DNA. This is the first time that both the ORC binding site and the replication start site have been identified in a metazoan amplification origin. Thus, our findings extend the paradigm from yeast ARS1 to multicellular eukaryotes, implicating ORC as a determinant of the position of replication initiation.
Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphatases/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphate/analogs & derivatives , DNA Replication , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Insect Proteins/metabolism , Replication Origin , Adenosine Triphosphatases/genetics , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphate/pharmacology , Animals , Base Sequence , Binding Sites , DNA, Complementary , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Diptera/genetics , Diptera/metabolism , Insect Proteins/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , Origin Recognition ComplexABSTRACT
After differentiation either with exogenous macrophage (M) or with granulocyte/macrophage (GM) colony-stimulating factor (CSF) microglial cells were isolated from neonatal mouse brain cell cultures and were comparatively tested for secretory immune effector cell functions. Both factors obviously do not promote the development of cells with biased growth requirement; however, the two microglia populations displayed distinct potentials to produce inflammatory cytokines. Upon gradual stimulation by lipopolysaccharide, the cells harvested from M-CSF-driven culture released more interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor activity, GM-CSF-grown cells on the contrary proved superior in interleukin-6 secretion. This pattern was paralleled by corresponding different kinetics of cytokine release in both types of microglial cells. When infected with Toxoplasma gondii only GM-CSF-differentiated cells were able to restrict the intracellular multiplication of tachyzoites in the absence of external stimuli. As described for interferon-gamma-treated macrophages, the antiparasitic activity of this microglia population is due to the synthesis of reactive nitrogen intermediates, since it was antagonized by NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, a competitive inhibitor of the arginine-dependent metabolic pathway. Complementary to previous data which attest an intrinsic capability for antigen presentation to GM-CSF-grown microglia, the functional state of the cells elicited by M-CSF and GM-CSF, respectively, may correspond to the resting and an activated form of microglia as distinguished in vivo.