ESTIMation of the ABiLity of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection to modify outcomes in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic central neck dissection in clinically low-risk cT1bT2N0 papillary thyroid carcinoma is controversial, due to a large number of conflicting retrospective studies, some showing an advantage in terms of locoregional recurrence, others showing no advantage. These previous studies all show high rates of excellent response. We aim to demonstrate the non-inferiority of thyroidectomy alone as compared to total thyroidectomy with prophylactic central neck dissection in conjunction with adjuvant RAI 30 mCi with rTSH stimulation in terms of excellent response at 1 year. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective randomized open multicenter phase III trial including patients with 11-40-mm papillary thyroid carcinoma (Bethesda VI) or suspicious cytology (Bethesda V) confirmed malignant on intra-operative frozen section analysis, with no suspicious lymph nodes on a specialized preoperative ultrasound examination. Patients will be randomized 1:1 into two groups: the reference group total thyroidectomy with bilateral prophylactic central neck dissection, and the comparator group total thyroidectomy alone. All patients will receive an ablative dose of 30mCi of radioactive iodine (RAI) within 4 months of surgery. The primary outcome is to compare the rate of excellent response at 1 year after surgery between the groups, as defined by an unstimulated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level ≤ 0.2 ng/mL with no anti-Tg antibodies, an normal neck ultrasound and no ectopic uptake on the post-RAI scintiscan. Non-inferiority will be demonstrated if the rate of patients with excellent response at 1 year after randomization does not differ by more than 5%. Setting the significance level at 0.025 (one-sided) and a power of 80% requires a sample size of 598 patients (299 per group). Secondary outcomes are to compare Tg levels at 8 +/- 2 postoperative weeks, before RAI ablation, the rate of excellent response at 3 and 5 years, the rate of other responses at 1, 3, and 5 years (biochemical incomplete, indeterminate, and structurally incomplete responses), complications, quality of life, and cost-utility. DISCUSSION (POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS): If non-inferiority is demonstrated with this high-level evidence, prophylactic neck dissection will have been shown to not be necessary in clinically low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03570021. June 26,2018.

Impact of COVID-19 on healthcare organisation and cancer outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Changes in the management of patients with cancer and delays in treatment delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic may impact the use of hospital resources and cancer mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient flows, patient pathways and use of hospital resources during the pandemic were simulated using a discrete event simulation model and patient-level data from a large French comprehensive cancer centre's discharge database, considering two scenarios of delays: massive return of patients from November 2020 (early-return) or March 2021 (late-return). Expected additional cancer deaths at 5 years and mortality rate were estimated using individual hazard ratios based on literature. RESULTS: The number of patients requiring hospital care during the simulation period was 13,000. In both scenarios, 6-8% of patients were estimated to present a delay of >2 months. The overall additional cancer deaths at 5 years were estimated at 88 in early-return and 145 in late-return scenario, with increased additional deaths estimated for sarcomas, gynaecological, liver, head and neck, breast cancer and acute leukaemia. This represents a relative additional cancer mortality rate at 5 years of 4.4 and 6.8% for patients expected in year 2020, 0.5 and 1.3% in 2021 and 0.5 and 0.5% in 2022 for each scenario, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pandemic-related diagnostic and treatment delays in patients with cancer are expected to impact patient survival. In the perspective of recurrent pandemics or alternative events requiring an intensive use of limited hospital resources, patients should be informed not to postpone care, and medical resources for patients with cancer should be sanctuarised.

The medical treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancers in 2019. A TUTHYREF® network review.

Patients with radioiodine-refractory (RAIR) differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) represent a challenging subgroup of DTC because they are at higher risk of cancer-related death. Multidisciplinary discussions can assess the role and the nature of local treatments, but also determine the optimal timing for first-line antiangiogenic therapy as some of these patients can be followed for several months or years without any treatment. In this review, we will examine the definition of RAIR-DTC, the different treatment options and finally some of the most recent cancer research breakthroughs for RAIR-DTC.

Olanzapine as antiemetic drug in oncology: a retrospective study in non-responders to standard antiemetic therapy.

Background The role of olanzapine in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in addition to the antiemetic therapeutic combination with aprepitant, setrons, and corticosteroids has not been well defined. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the addition of olanzapine to a standard triplet therapy for the prevention of CINV in patients who experienced CINV during their first chemotherapy course, despite receiving a well-managed prevention protocol. Setting One comprehensive cancer centre in France. Method In a retrospective study with comparator, patients with a high risk of emesis were assigned to two groups during two different 6-month periods, before and after the introduction of olanzapine in clinical practice, respectively. In the olanzapine group, the antiemetic protocol for the second course of chemotherapy was reinforced by the addition of olanzapine at 5 mg/day from day 1 to 5 in contrast with the control group. Main outcome measure The proportion of patients who experienced neither nausea nor emesis during the delayed phase (24-120 h). Results The 25 patients in each group exhibited comparable characteristics and emetic chemotherapy level. During the first course, no significant difference was observed. During the second course, nausea and vomiting were ameliorated in 12 patients in the olanzapine group and 4 patients in the control group (p < 0.05). Nausea (12 vs. 4, p < 0.05) and vomiting (18 vs. 11, p < 0.05) also significantly improved. In the OLZ group, no adverse event was linked to olanzapine use. Conclusion The addition of olanzapine was observed to effectively restore CINV prevention in patients who did not respond to standard antiemetic therapy.

Value of a short-term imaging follow-up after a benign result in a one-stop breast unit: Is it still useful?

INTRODUCTION: A short-term radiologic follow-up after a benign breast biopsy or fine needle aspiration (FNA) is recommended in many guidelines. However, the current trend is to reduce imaging investigations, radiation dose and costs. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the cancer detection rate at short-term follow-up and to estimate its cost. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed all consecutive patients referred to our 'one-stop' breast unit between 2004 and 2012, with a benign histological or cytological result and at least one short-term follow-up within 3-12 months after the initial diagnosis. We evaluated the number of cancers detected, as well as the mean cost to detect each cancer and per patient. RESULTS: About 1366 patients were eligible for this study. Ten patients were diagnosed with cancers (0.73%) at short-term follow-up; six of 10 were low-grade tumours or ductal carcinoma in situ. The cost for detecting one cancer was 19,043€, with mean cost per patient of 139€. CONCLUSION: The cancer detection rate at short-term follow-up after benign biopsy or FNA was low and was similar to that of most national screening programs. The cost of cancer detection appeared high, considering that most cancers were indolent. This suggests that radiologic follow-up could reasonably be carried out at a later point in time.

Postoperative fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: an important imaging modality in patients with aggressive histology of differentiated thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive histopathologic subtypes of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) are fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid tumors and are at high risk for persistent/recurrent disease. In these patients, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is performed in cases of suspicion of recurrence based on thyroglobulin (Tg) levels or thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb). The goals of this study were to evaluate the sensitivity of systematic postoperative FDG-PET/CT and to identify risk factors for abnormal FDG-PET/CT. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of 38 consecutive patients (16 males, 22 females; mean age, 57 years) with aggressive histology DTC, without known persistent disease at the time of postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation. The most frequent aggressive histologic subtypes were tall cell papillary carcinoma (45%) and poorly differentiated carcinoma (42%). RESULTS: A total of 86 lesions were found in 20 (53%) patients, distributed in 33 organs. FDG-PET/CT and the postablation whole-body scan (RAI WBS) showed persistent disease in 15 and 12 patients, respectively. FDG-PET/CT was more sensitive than WBS for the detection of individual lesions (69% vs. 59%). Both imaging techniques were complementary with 41% of the lesions detected only by FDG-PET/CT and 31% only by RAI WBS. The only risk factor of abnormal FDG-PET/CT was a stimulated Tg level (Tg/TSH) measured at ablation >10 ng/mL with persistent disease showing FDG uptake in 72% of the patients with a Tg/TSH >10 ng/mL and in 10% of the patients with Tg/TSH ≤10 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Postoperative FDG-PET/CT should be performed routinely in patients with aggressive histology DTC.

[Modalities of management of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia in the oncology emergency unit of Gustave-Roussy and their related costs]. / Modalités de prise en charge des neutropénies fébriles chez les patients traités pour une néoplasie solide dans le service d'urgence de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy et leurs impacts économiques.

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a severe chemotherapy side effect. Hospitalization is recommended for FN episode of high-risk (HR) of complications. Management of FN at lower risk of complications remains unclear. METHODS: This is a prospective observation study in patients with solid tumors admitted to the emergency department FN. Collected data included demographics, clinical, biological, therapeutic costs, MASCC score and complications. RESULTS: Hundred and thirty-seven consecutive FN were recorded in 128 patients. Twenty-six FN (19%) were managed at home (all of them had a MASCC score ≥ 21); 111 (81%) were treated at hospital of which 37 NF were at HR of complications based on clinical and biological parameters (all of them had a MASCC score < 21) and for 74 of them the admission could be discussed (MASCC < 20 or ≥ 20). This group of patients was considerate with intermediate risk (IR). All IR patients were treated with the same antibiotics than outpatients, i.e. ceftriaxone in 36 cases (49%) or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and ciprofloxacin in 38 cases (51%). For these 74 cases, any severe complication was recorded. Antibiotics were adapted for only 12% of these patients according to bacteriology results. CONCLUSION: This study showed the limits of the MASCC score. We did not observe any severe complications in patients admitted to the hospital according to clinical and biological parameters and with the high risk score MASCC. This study had some methodological bias but it allowed us to estimate the cost of the different ways of management and the difficulties to decide the hospitalization in FN.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective study of the TUTHYREF network.

OBJECTIVE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used to treat patients with advanced thyroid cancers. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of TKIs administered outside of clinical trials in metastatic sites or locally advanced thyroid cancer patients from five French oncology centers. DESIGN AND METHODS: THERE WERE 62 PATIENTS (37 MEN, MEAN AGE: 61 years) treated with sorafenib (62%), sunitinib (22%), and vandetanib (16%) outside of clinical trials; 22 had papillary, five had follicular, five had Hürthle cell, 13 had poorly differentiated, and 17 had medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Thirty-three, 25, and four patients were treated with one, two, and three lines of TKIs respectively. Primary endpoints were objective tumor response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). Sequential treatments and tumor response according to metastatic sites were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Among the 39 sorafenib and 12 sunitinib treatments in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) patients, partial response (PR) rate was 15 and 8% respectively. In the 11 MTC patients treated with vandetanib, 36% had PR. Median PFS was similar in second-line compared with first-line sorafenib or sunitinib therapy (6.7 vs 7.0 months) in DTC patients, but there was no PR with second- and third-line treatments. Bone and pleural lesions were the most refractory sites to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest retrospective study evaluating TKI therapies outside of clinical trials. DTC patients treated with second-line therapy had stable disease as best response, but had a similar median PFS compared with the first-line treatment.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line chemotherapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The De Gramont regimen (or high-dose LV5FU2, HD-LV5FU2) is considered a standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the costs of three regimens as compared to HD-LV5FU2: raltitrexed (R), LV5FU2 with a lower dose of folinic acid (LD-LV5FU2), and weekly infusional 5FU (WI-FU). METHODS: An economic analysis was performed prospectively as part of a randomized trial comparing first-line chemotherapy regimens in 294 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Direct medical costs were computed from the health system viewpoint using 2001 unit costs. RESULTS: None of the three regimens improved EFS as compared to HD-LV5FU2. R was less effective and more toxic. The mean total cost per patient was euro 15,970 for HD-LV5FU2. The cost of R (10,687 euro) was lower than that of HD-LV5FU2 (p = 0.008). The cost of LD-LV5FU2 (14,888 euro) and of WI-FU (13,760 euro) was not significantly different from that of HD-LV5FU2. CONCLUSION: The lower efficacy and increased toxicity of R made it a clinically inferior regimen despite its easy administration and lower cost. The HD-LV5FU2 protocol remains a better treatment. LD-LV5FU2 appeared a good alternative regimen because it reduced costs without jeopardizing its efficacy. The WI-FU regimen did not show a significant difference in terms of efficacy, but suggested toxicity to be slightly increased.