ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: We investigated whether baseline dietary calcium intake or vitamin D status modified the effects of zoledronate. Neither variable influenced the effect of zoledronate on bone mineral density, bone turnover, or risk of acute phase reaction, suggesting that co-administration of calcium and vitamin D supplements with zoledronate may not always be necessary. INTRODUCTION: Calcium and vitamin D supplements are often co-administered with bisphosphonates, but it is unclear whether they are necessary for therapeutic efficacy or minimizing side effects of bisphosphonates. We investigated whether baseline dietary calcium intake or vitamin D status modified the effect of zoledronate on bone mineral density (BMD) or bone turnover at 1 year, or the risk of acute phase reactions (APR). METHODS: Data were pooled from two trials of zoledronate in postmenopausal women without vitamin D deficiency in which calcium and vitamin D were not routinely administered. The cohort (zoledronate n = 154, placebo n = 68) was divided into subgroups by baseline dietary calcium intake (<800 vs. ≥800 mg/day) and vitamin D status [25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) <50 vs. ≥50 nmol/L, and <75 nmol/L vs. ≥75 nmol/L] and treatment × subgroup interactions tested. RESULTS: There were 52, 86, and 36 % of the zoledronate group and 64, 94, and 46 % of the placebo group that had dietary calcium intake ≥800 mg/day, 25OHD ≥50 nmol/L, and 25OHD ≥75 nmol/L, respectively. There were no significant interactions between treatment and either baseline dietary calcium or baseline vitamin D status for lumbar spine BMD, total hip BMD, the bone turnover markers P1NP and ß-CTx, or the risk of an APR. There was also no three-way interaction between baseline dietary calcium intake, baseline vitamin D status, and treatment for any of these variables. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline dietary calcium intake and vitamin D status did not alter the effects of zoledronate, suggesting that co-administration of calcium and vitamin D with zoledronate may not be necessary for individuals not at risk of marked vitamin D deficiency.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Density/drug effects , Calcium, Dietary/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Food-Drug Interactions/physiology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Acute-Phase Reaction/chemically induced , Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Calcium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/blood , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vitamin D/blood , Zoledronic AcidABSTRACT
Palliative care of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is often undertaken by CF teams rather than palliative care teams because of the specialist nature of the disease and the potential role of lung transplantation. We developed an integrated model of provision of palliative care whereby most care is delivered by the CF team using palliative guidelines and pathways, with additional support available from the specialist palliative care team when needed. We report our experience of the terminal care of 40 patients with CF with regard to the circumstances of death, lung transplantation status, specific symptoms and provision of palliative treatments. The transition from disease modifying treatments to palliative care was particularly complex. Patients had a high level of symptoms requiring palliation and most died in hospital. Palliative care is a crucial component of a CF service and requires the specialist skills of both the CF and palliative care teams.