Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0244320, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33395413

ABSTRACT

In some patients, migraine attacks are associated with symptoms of allodynia which can be localized (cephalic) or generalized (extracephalic). Using functional neuroimaging and cutaneous thermal stimulation, we aimed to investigate the differences in brain activation of patients with episodic migraine (n = 19) based on their allodynic status defined by changes between ictal and interictal pain tolerance threshold for each subject at the time of imaging. In this prospective imaging study, differences were found in brain activity between the ictal and interictal visits in the brainstem/pons, thalamus, insula, cerebellum and cingulate cortex. Significant differences were also observed in the pattern of activation along the trigeminal pathway to noxious heat stimuli in no allodynia vs. generalized allodynia in the thalamus and the trigeminal nucleus but there were no activation differences in the trigeminal ganglion. The functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) findings provide direct evidence for the view that in migraine patients who are allodynic during the ictal phase of their attacks, the spinal trigeminal nucleus and posterior thalamus become hyper-responsive (sensitized)-to the extent that they mediate cephalic and extracephalic allodynia, respectively. In addition, descending analgesic systems seem as "switched off" in generalized allodynia.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Hyperalgesia/pathology , Migraine Disorders/complications , Adult , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain Mapping , Female , Gyrus Cinguli/physiopathology , Humans , Hyperalgesia/complications , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Interviews as Topic , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Threshold , Prospective Studies , Temperature , Thalamus/physiopathology
2.
Cephalalgia ; 39(13): 1710-1719, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31466456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical picture, but also neuroimaging findings, suggested the brainstem and midbrain structures as possible driving or generating structures in migraine. FINDINGS: This has been intensely discussed in the last decades and the advent of modern imaging studies refined the involvement of rostral parts of the pons in acute migraine attacks, but more importantly suggested a predominant role of the hypothalamus and alterations in hypothalamic functional connectivity shortly before the beginning of migraine headaches. This was shown in the NO-triggered and also in the preictal stage of native human migraine attacks. Another headache type that is clinically even more suggestive of hypothalamic involvement is cluster headache, and indeed a structure in close proximity to the hypothalamus has been identified to play a crucial role in attack generation. CONCLUSION: It is very likely that spontaneous oscillations of complex networks involving the hypothalamus, brainstem, and dopaminergic networks lead to changes in susceptibility thresholds that ultimately start but also terminate headache attacks. We will review clinical and neuroscience evidence that puts the hypothalamus in the center of scientific attention when attack generation is discussed.


Subject(s)
Headache/physiopathology , Hypothalamus/physiopathology , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Brain Stem/physiopathology , Craving/physiology , Dopamine/physiology , Emotions , Endocrine System/physiopathology , Humans , Migraine Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Nitric Oxide/physiology , Nociception/physiology , Pain Perception/physiology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Prodromal Symptoms
3.
J Headache Pain ; 20(1): 76, 2019 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266456

ABSTRACT

Unremitting head and neck pain (UHNP) is a commonly encountered phenomenon in Headache Medicine and may be seen in the setting of many well-defined headache types. The prevalence of UHNP is not clear, and establishing the presence of UHNP may require careful questioning at repeated patient visits. The cause of UHNP in some patients may be compression of the lesser and greater occipital nerves by the posterior cervical muscles and their fascial attachments at the occipital ridge with subsequent local perineural inflammation. The resulting pain is typically in the sub-occipital and occipital location, and, via anatomic connections between extracranial and intracranial nerves, may radiate frontally to trigeminal-innervated areas of the head. Migraine-like features of photophobia and nausea may occur with frontal radiation. Occipital allodynia is common, as is spasm of the cervical muscles. Patients with UHNP may comprise a subgroup of Chronic Migraine, as well as of Chronic Tension-Type Headache, New Daily Persistent Headache and Cervicogenic Headache. Centrally acting membrane-stabilizing agents, which are often ineffective for CM, are similarly generally ineffective for UHNP. Extracranially-directed treatments such as occipital nerve blocks, cervical trigger point injections, botulinum toxin and monoclonal antibodies directed at calcitonin gene related peptide, which act primarily in the periphery, may provide more substantial relief for UHNP; additionally, decompression of the occipital nerves from muscular and fascial compression is effective for some patients, and may result in enduring pain relief. Further study is needed to determine the prevalence of UHNP, and to understand the role of occipital nerve compression in UHNP and of occipital nerve decompression surgery in chronic head and neck pain.


Subject(s)
Headache Disorders/etiology , Neck Pain/etiology , Nerve Compression Syndromes/complications , Headache Disorders/therapy , Humans , Neck Pain/therapy , Nerve Block/methods , Nerve Compression Syndromes/therapy , Spinal Nerves
4.
Headache ; 59(8): 1240-1252, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31074005

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) device for the acute treatment of migraine. BACKGROUND: There is a significant unmet need for novel effective well-tolerated acute migraine treatments. REN is a novel acute migraine treatment that stimulates upper arm peripheral nerves to induce conditioned pain modulation - an endogenous analgesic mechanism in which conditioning stimulation inhibits pain in remote body regions. A recent pilot study showed that REN can significantly reduce headache. We have conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of REN for the acute treatment of migraine. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter study conducted at 7 sites in the United States and 5 sites in Israel. Two hundred and fifty-two adults meeting the International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria for migraine with 2-8 migraine headaches per month were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to active or sham stimulation. A smartphone-controlled wireless device was applied for 30-45 minutes on the upper arm within 1 hour of attack onset; electrical stimulation was at a perceptible but non-painful intensity level. Migraine pain levels were recorded at baseline, 2, and 48 hours post-treatment. Most bothersome symptoms (MBS) were also recorded. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants achieving pain relief at 2 hours post-treatment (improvement from severe or moderate pain to mild or none, or from mild pain to none). Relief of MBS and pain-free at 2 hours were key secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Active stimulation was more effective than sham stimulation in achieving pain relief (66.7% [66/99] vs 38.8% [40/103]; therapeutic gain of 27.9% [CI95% , 15.6-40.2]; P < .0001), pain-free (37.4% vs 18.4%, P = .003), and MBS relief (46.3% vs 22.2%, P = .0008) at 2 hours post-treatment. The pain relief and pain-free superiority of the active treatment was sustained 48 hours post-treatment. The incidence of device-related adverse events was low and similar between treatment groups (4.8% [6/126] vs 2.4% [3/126], P = .499). CONCLUSIONS: REN provides superior clinically meaningful relief of migraine pain and MBS compared to placebo, offering a safe and effective non-pharmacological alternative for acute migraine treatment.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/instrumentation , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods , Wireless Technology/instrumentation , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 39(1): 94-102, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30762717

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Photophobia is commonly associated with migraine, meningitis, concussion, and a variety of ocular diseases. Advances in our ability to trace multiple brain pathways through which light information is processed have paved the way to a better understanding of the neurobiology of photophobia and the complexity of the symptoms triggered by light. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to summarize recent anatomical and physiological studies on the neurobiology of photophobia with emphasis on migraine. RECENT FINDINGS: Observations made in blind and seeing migraine patients, and in a variety of animal models, have led to the discovery of a novel retino-thalamo-cortical pathway that carries photic signal from melanopsinergic and nonmelanopsinergic retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to thalamic neurons. Activity of these neurons is driven by migraine and their axonal projections convey signals about headache and light to multiple cortical areas involved in the generation of common migraine symptoms. Novel projections of RGCs into previously unidentified hypothalamic neurons that regulate parasympathetic and sympathetic functions have also been discovered. Finally, recent work has led to a novel understanding of color preference in migraine-type photophobia and of the roles played by the retina, thalamus, and cortex. SUMMARY: The findings provide a neural substrate for understanding the complexity of aversion to light in patients with migraine and neuro-ophthalmologic other disorders.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/complications , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Photophobia/etiology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/physiology , Thalamus/physiopathology , Animals , Humans , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Photophobia/physiopathology
6.
Cephalalgia ; 39(13): 1623-1634, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29940781

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical and pre-clinical evidence supporting the role of visual pathways, from the eye to the cortex, in the development of photophobia in headache disorders. BACKGROUND: Photophobia is a poorly understood light-induced phenomenon that emerges in a variety of neurological and ophthalmological conditions. Over the years, multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain its causes; however, scarce research and lack of systematic assessment of photophobia in patients has made the search for answers quite challenging. In the field of headaches, significant progress has been made recently on how specific visual networks contribute to photophobia features such as light-induced intensification of headache, increased perception of brightness and visual discomfort, which are frequently experienced by migraineurs. Such progress improved our understanding of the phenomenon and points to abnormal processing of light by both cone/rod-mediated image-forming and melanopsin-mediated non-image-forming visual pathways, and the consequential transfer of photic signals to multiple brain regions involved in sensory, autonomic and emotional regulation. CONCLUSION: Photophobia phenotype is diverse, and the relative contribution of visual, trigeminal and autonomic systems may depend on the disease it emerges from. In migraine, photophobia could result from photic activation of retina-driven pathways involved in the regulation of homeostasis, making its association with headache more complex than previously thought.


Subject(s)
Headache/physiopathology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Visual Pathways/physiopathology , Animals , Blindness/physiopathology , Brain Stem/physiopathology , Color , Headache/complications , Humans , Light/adverse effects , Mesencephalon/physiopathology , Mice , Migraine Disorders/complications , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Photic Stimulation/adverse effects , Photophobia/etiology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/physiology , Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells/physiology , Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells/radiation effects , Rod Opsins/physiology , Somatosensory Cortex/physiopathology , Thalamus/physiopathology
7.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 114(28): E5683-E5692, 2017 07 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28652355

ABSTRACT

Migraineurs avoid light because it intensifies their headache. However, this is not the only reason for their aversion to light. Studying migraineurs and control subjects, we found that lights triggered more changes in autonomic functions and negative emotions during, rather than in the absence of, migraine or in control subjects, and that the association between light and positive emotions was stronger in control subjects than migraineurs. Seeking to define a neuroanatomical substrate for these findings, we showed that, in rats, axons of retinal ganglion cells converge on hypothalamic neurons that project directly to nuclei in the brainstem and spinal cord that regulate parasympathetic and sympathetic functions and contain dopamine, histamine, orexin, melanin-concentrating hormone, oxytocin, and vasopressin. Although the rat studies define frameworks for conceptualizing how light triggers the symptoms described by patients, the human studies suggest that the aversive nature of light is more complex than its association with headache intensification.


Subject(s)
Hypothalamus/physiology , Light , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Neurons/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Autonomic Nervous System/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Color , Emotions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Neurological , Photophobia , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Retina/physiology , Sympathetic Nervous System/physiology , Young Adult
8.
Headache ; 57 Suppl 2: 97-111, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28485844

ABSTRACT

Dynamic thalamic regulation of sensory signals allows the cortex to adjust better to rapidly changing behavioral, physiological, and environmental demands. To fulfill this role, thalamic neurons must themselves be subjected to constantly changing modulatory inputs that originate in multiple neurochemical pathways involved in autonomic, affective, and cognitive functions. This review defines a chemical framework for thinking about the complexity of factors that modulate the response properties of relay trigeminovascular thalamic neurons. Following the presentation of scientific evidence for monosynaptic connections between thalamic trigeminovascular neurons and axons containing glutamate, GABA, dopamine, noradrenaline, serotonin, histamine, orexin, and melanin-concentrating hormone, this review synthesizes a large body of data to propose that the transmission of headache-related nociceptive signals from the thalamus to the cortex is modulated by potentially opposing forces and that the so-called 'decision' of which system (neuropeptide/neurotransmitter) will dominate the firing of a trigeminovascular thalamic neuron at any given time is determined by the constantly changing physiological (sleep, wakefulness, food intake, body temperature, heart rate, blood pressure), behavioral (addiction, isolation), cognitive (attention, learning, memory use), and affective (stress, anxiety, depression, anger) adjustment needed to keep homeostasis.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Neuropeptides/metabolism , Neurotransmitter Agents/metabolism , Synaptic Transmission/physiology , Animals , Cerebral Cortex/metabolism , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Humans , Migraine Disorders/metabolism , Neural Pathways/metabolism , Thalamus/metabolism , Thalamus/physiopathology
9.
J Neurosci ; 36(30): 8026-36, 2016 07 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27466345

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: For many years, neurobiological theories have emphasized the importance of neuronal oscillations in the emergence of brain function. At the same time, clinical studies have shown that disturbances or irregularities in brain rhythms may relate to various common neurological conditions, including migraine. Increasing evidence suggests that the CNS plays a fundamental role in the predisposition to develop different forms of headache. Here, we present human imaging data that strongly support the presence of abnormal low-frequency oscillations (LFOs) in thalamocortical networks of patients in the interictal phase of migraine. Our results show that the main source of arrhythmic activity was localized to the higher-order thalamic relays of the medial dorsal nucleus. In addition, spontaneous LFOs in the thalamus were selectively associated with the headache attack frequency, meaning that the varying amplitude of dysrhythmia could predispose patients to recurrent attacks. Rhythmic cortical feedback to the thalamus is a major factor in the amplification of thalamocortical oscillations, making it a strong candidate for influencing neuronal excitability. We further speculate that the intrinsic dynamics of thalamocortical network oscillations are crucial for early sensory processing and therefore could underlie important pathophysiological processes involved in multisensory integration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In many cases, migraine attacks are thought to begin centrally. A major obstacle to studying intrinsic brain activity has been the identification of the precise anatomical structures and functional networks that are involved in migraine. Here, we present imaging data that strongly support the presence of abnormal low-frequency oscillations in thalamocortical networks of patients in the interictal phase of migraine. This arrhythmic activity was localized to the higher-order thalamic relays of the medial dorsal nucleus and was selectively associated with headache attack frequency. Rhythmic cortical feedback to the thalamus is a major factor in the amplification of thalamocortical oscillations, making it a strong candidate for influencing neuronal excitability and higher-level processes involved in multisensory integration.


Subject(s)
Biological Clocks , Brain Waves , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Nerve Net/physiopathology , Thalamus/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Brain Mapping , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Young Adult
10.
Brain ; 139(Pt 7): 1971-86, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27190022

ABSTRACT

Migraine headache is uniquely exacerbated by light. Using psychophysical assessments in patients with normal eyesight we found that green light exacerbates migraine headache significantly less than white, blue, amber or red lights. To delineate mechanisms, we used electroretinography and visual evoked potential recording in patients, and multi-unit recording of dura- and light-sensitive thalamic neurons in rats to show that green activates cone-driven retinal pathways to a lesser extent than white, blue and red; that thalamic neurons are most responsive to blue and least responsive to green; and that cortical responses to green are significantly smaller than those generated by blue, amber and red lights. These findings suggest that patients' experience with colour and migraine photophobia could originate in cone-driven retinal pathways, fine-tuned in relay thalamic neurons outside the main visual pathway, and preserved by the cortex. Additionally, the findings provide substrate for the soothing effects of green light.


Subject(s)
Electroretinography/methods , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Neurons/physiology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells/physiology , Thalamus/physiopathology , Visual Pathways/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/complications , Photic Stimulation , Photophobia/etiology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Young Adult
11.
Cephalalgia ; 36(9): 875-86, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26984967

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Administration of onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) to peripheral tissues outside the calvaria reduces the number of days chronic migraine patients experience headache. Because the headache phase of a migraine attack, especially those preceded by aura, is thought to involve activation of meningeal nociceptors by endogenous stimuli such as changes in intracranial pressure (i.e. mechanical) or chemical irritants that appear in the meninges as a result of a yet-to-be-discovered sequence of molecular/cellular events triggered by the aura, we sought to determine whether extracranial injections of BoNT-A alter the chemosensitivity of meningeal nociceptors to stimulation of their intracranial receptive fields. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using electrophysiological techniques, we identified 161 C- and 135 Aδ-meningeal nociceptors in rats and determined their mechanical response threshold and responsiveness to chemical stimulation of their dural receptive fields with TRPV1 and TRPA1 agonists seven days after BoNT-A administration to different extracranial sites. Two paradigms were compared: distribution of 5 U BoNT-A to the lambdoid and sagittal sutures alone, and 1.25 U to the sutures and 3.75 U to the temporalis and trapezius muscles. RESULTS: Seven days after it was administered to tissues outside the calvaria, BoNT-A inhibited responses of C-type meningeal nociceptors to stimulation of their intracranial dural receptive fields with the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin and the TRPA1 agonist mustard oil. BoNT-A inhibition of responses to capsaicin was more effective when the entire dose was injected along the suture lines than when it was injected into muscles and sutures. As in our previous study, BoNT-A had no effect on non-noxious mechanosensitivity of C-fibers or on responsiveness of Aδ-fibers to mechanical and chemical stimulation. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that extracranial administration of BoNT-A suppresses meningeal nociceptors' responses to stimulation of their intracranial dural receptive fields with capsaicin and mustard oil. The findings suggest that surface expression of TRPV1 and TRPA1 channels in dural nerve endings of meningeal nociceptors is reduced seven days after extracranial administration of BoNT-A. In the context of chronic migraine, reduced sensitivity to molecules that activate meningeal nociceptors through the TRPV1 and TRPA1 channels can be important for BoNT-A's ability to act as a prophylactic.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A/pharmacology , Meninges/drug effects , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Neuromuscular Agents/pharmacology , Nociceptors/drug effects , Animals , Capsaicin/pharmacology , Cranial Sutures/drug effects , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Mustard Plant , Plant Oils/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Sensory System Agents/pharmacology , TRPA1 Cation Channel , TRPC Cation Channels/agonists , TRPV Cation Channels/agonists
12.
PLoS One ; 9(8): e103929, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25090640

ABSTRACT

Dynamic thalamic regulation of sensory signals allows the cortex to adjust better to rapidly changing behavioral, physiological and environmental demands. To fulfill this role, thalamic neurons must themselves be subjected to constantly changing modulatory inputs that originate in multiple neurochemical pathways involved in autonomic, affective and cognitive functions. Our overall goal is to define an anatomical framework for conceptualizing how a 'decision' is made on whether a trigeminovascular thalamic neuron fires, for how long, and at what frequency. To begin answering this question, we determine which neuropeptides/neurotransmitters are in a position to modulate thalamic trigeminovascular neurons. Using a combination of in-vivo single-unit recording, juxtacellular labeling with tetramethylrhodamine dextran (TMR) and in-vitro immunohistochemistry, we found that thalamic trigeminovascular neurons were surrounded by high density of axons containing biomarkers of glutamate, GABA, dopamine and serotonin; moderate density of axons containing noradrenaline and histamine; low density of axons containing orexin and melanin concentrating hormone (MCH); but not axons containing CGRP, serotonin 1D receptor, oxytocin or vasopressin. In the context of migraine, the findings suggest that the transmission of headache-related nociceptive signals from the thalamus to the cortex may be modulated by opposing forces (i.e., facilitatory, inhibitory) that are governed by continuous adjustments needed to keep physiological, behavioral, cognitive and emotional homeostasis.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Neurons/pathology , Neurotransmitter Agents/metabolism , Sleep , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Thalamus/physiopathology , Trigeminal Nerve/physiopathology , Animals , Anxiety/psychology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Brain Stem/physiopathology , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/metabolism , Dopamine/metabolism , Eating , Glutamates/metabolism , Histamine/metabolism , Hypothalamic Hormones/metabolism , Hypothalamus/physiopathology , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Male , Melanins/metabolism , Migraine Disorders/psychology , Neuropeptides/metabolism , Norepinephrine/metabolism , Orexins , Oxytocin/metabolism , Pituitary Hormones/metabolism , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Serotonin/metabolism , Trigeminal Nerve/blood supply , Vasopressins/metabolism
13.
PLoS One ; 9(4): e95508, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24743801

ABSTRACT

The hypothalamus has been implicated in migraine based on the manifestation of autonomic symptoms with the disease, as well as neuroimaging evidence of hypothalamic activation during attacks. Our objective was to determine functional connectivity (FC) changes between the hypothalamus and the rest of the brain in migraine patients vs. control subjects. This study uses fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) to acquire resting state scans in 12 interictal migraine patients and 12 healthy matched controls. Hypothalamic connectivity seeds were anatomically defined based on high-resolution structural scans, and FC was assessed in the resting state scans. Migraine patients had increased hypothalamic FC with a number of brain regions involved in regulation of autonomic functions, including the locus coeruleus, caudate, parahippocampal gyrus, cerebellum, and the temporal pole. Stronger functional connections between the hypothalamus and brain areas that regulate sympathetic and parasympathetic functions may explain some of the hypothalamic-mediated autonomic symptoms that accompany or precede migraine attacks.


Subject(s)
Hypothalamus/physiology , Locus Coeruleus/physiology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Adult , Brain/physiology , Cerebellum/physiology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Parahippocampal Gyrus/physiopathology , Young Adult
14.
Headache ; 50(6): 1064-9, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20618819

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of improved pain control and function in a patient with chronic migraine after treatment with auriculotemporal nerve stimulation. METHODS: The patient is a 52-year-old woman with refractory pain in the bilateral temporal distribution and marked phonophobia as a result of chronic migraine. RESULTS: After a successful trial period, the patient underwent implantation of bilateral peripheral nerve stimulators targeting the auriculotemporal nerves. At 16 months of follow up, her average pain intensity declined from 8-9/10 on the numeric rating scale to 5/10. Her function improved as assessed by the Migraine Disability Assessment, from total disability (grade IV) to mild disability (grade II). Her phonophobia became far less debilitating. CONCLUSION: Auriculotemporal nerve stimulation may be useful tool in the treatment of refractory pain in the temporal distribution due to chronic migraine.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Mandibular Nerve , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Pain, Intractable/therapy , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome
15.
Ann Neurol ; 68(1): 81-91, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20582997

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Focal somatic pain can evolve into widespread hypersensitivity to nonpainful and painful skin stimuli (allodynia and hyperalgesia, respectively). We hypothesized that transformation of headache into whole-body allodynia/hyperalgesia during a migraine attack is mediated by sensitization of thalamic neurons that process converging sensory impulses from the cranial meninges and extracephalic skin. METHODS: Extracephalic allodynia was assessed using single unit recording of thalamic trigeminovascular neurons in rats and contrast analysis of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals registered in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans of patients exhibiting extracephalic allodynia. RESULTS: Sensory neurons in the rat posterior thalamus that were activated and sensitized by chemical stimulation of the cranial dura exhibited long-lasting hyperexcitability to innocuous (brush, pressure) and noxious (pinch, heat) stimulation of the paws. Innocuous, extracephalic skin stimuli that did not produce neuronal firing at baseline (eg, brush) became as effective as noxious stimuli (eg, pinch) in eliciting large bouts of neuronal firing after sensitization was established. In migraine patients, fMRI assessment of BOLD signals showed that brush and heat stimulation at the skin of the dorsum of the hand produced larger BOLD responses in the posterior thalamus of subjects undergoing a migraine attack with extracephalic allodynia than the corresponding responses registered when the same patients were free of migraine and allodynia. INTERPRETATION: We propose that the spreading of multimodal allodynia and hyperalgesia beyond the locus of migraine headache is mediated by sensitized thalamic neurons that process nociceptive information from the cranial meninges together with sensory information from the skin of the scalp, face, body, and limbs.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Pain/physiopathology , Thalamus/physiopathology , Action Potentials , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Dura Mater/physiopathology , Hot Temperature , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Microelectrodes , Middle Aged , Oxygen/blood , Physical Stimulation , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Sensory Receptor Cells/physiology , Thalamus/blood supply , Young Adult
16.
Nat Neurosci ; 13(2): 239-45, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20062053

ABSTRACT

The perception of migraine headache, which is mediated by nociceptive signals transmitted from the cranial dura mater to the brain, is uniquely exacerbated by exposure to light. We found that exacerbation of migraine headache by light is prevalent among blind individuals who maintain non-image-forming photoregulation in the face of massive rod/cone degeneration. Using single-unit recording and neural tract tracing in the rat, we identified dura-sensitive neurons in the posterior thalamus whose activity was distinctly modulated by light and whose axons projected extensively across layers I-V of somatosensory, visual and associative cortices. The cell bodies and dendrites of such dura/light-sensitive neurons were apposed by axons originating from retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), predominantly from intrinsically photosensitive RGCs, the principle conduit of non-image-forming photoregulation. We propose that photoregulation of migraine headache is exerted by a non-image-forming retinal pathway that modulates the activity of dura-sensitive thalamocortical neurons.


Subject(s)
Light/adverse effects , Migraine Disorders/etiology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Neurons/physiology , Retina/physiopathology , Thalamus/physiopathology , Adult , Animals , Axons/physiology , Blindness/epidemiology , Blindness/physiopathology , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Dendrites/physiology , Dura Mater/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Prevalence , Rats , Retinal Ganglion Cells/physiology
17.
Neurol Sci ; 30 Suppl 1: S27-31, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19415422

ABSTRACT

Migraine headache is triggered by and associated with a variety of hormonal, emotional, nutritional and physiological changes. The perception of migraine headache is formed when nociceptive signals originating in the meninges are conveyed to the somatosensory cortex through the trigeminal ganglion, medullary dorsal horn and thalamus. We propose that different migraine triggers activate a wide variety of brain areas that impinge on parasympathetic neurons innervating the meninges. According to this hypothesis, migraine triggers such as stress activate multiple hypothalamic, limbic and cortical areas, all of which contain neurons that project to the preganglionic parasympathetic neurons in the superior salivatory nucleus (SSN). The SSN, in turn, activates postganglionic parasympathetic neurons in the sphenopalatine ganglion, resulting in vasodilation and local release of inflammatory molecules that activate meningeal nociceptors. We propose that trigeminovascular projections from the medullary dorsal horn to selective areas in the midbrain, hypothalamus, amygdala and basal forebrain are functionally positioned to produce migraine symptoms such as irritability, loss of appetite, fatigue, depression and the quest for solitude. The network of bidirectional trafficking by which the trigeminovascular system can activate the same brain areas that have triggered its own activity in the first place provides an attractive mechanism of perpetual feedback that drives a migraine attack for many hours and even days.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Depression/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Blood Vessels/physiopathology , Brain/blood supply , Humans , Hypothalamus/physiopathology , Limbic System/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/psychology , Models, Neurological , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Trigeminal Ganglion/physiopathology
18.
J Comp Neurol ; 493(1): 9-14, 2005 Dec 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16258903

ABSTRACT

Migraine headache is triggered by and associated with a variety of hormonal, emotional, nutritional, and physiological changes. The perception of migraine headache is formed when nociceptive signals originating in the meninges are conveyed to the somatosensory cortex through the trigeminal ganglion, medullary dorsal horn, and thalamus. Is there a common descending pathway accounting for the activation of meningeal nociceptors by different migraine triggers? We propose that different migraine triggers activate a wide variety of brain areas that impinge on parasympathetic neurons innervating the meninges. According to this hypothesis, migraine triggers such as perfume, stress, or awakening activate multiple hypothalamic, limbic, and cortical areas, all of which contain neurons that project to the preganglionic parasympathetic neurons in the superior salivatory nucleus (SSN). The SSN, in turn, activates postganglionic parasympathetic neurons in the sphenopalatine ganglion, resulting in vasodilation and local release of inflammatory molecules that activate meningeal nociceptors. Are there ascending pathways through which the trigeminovascular system can induce the wide variety of migraine symptoms? We propose that trigeminovascular projections from the medullary dorsal horn to selective areas in the midbrain, hypothalamus, amygdala, and basal forebrain are functionally positioned to produce migraine symptoms such as irritability, loss of appetite, fatigue, depression, or the quest for solitude. Bidirectional trafficking by which the trigeminovascular system can activate the same brain areas that have triggered its own activity in the first place provides an attractive network of perpetual feedback that drives a migraine attack for many hours and even days.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Pain/physiopathology , Humans , Hypothalamus/physiopathology , Limbic System/metabolism , Limbic System/physiopathology , Meninges/blood supply , Models, Neurological , Neural Pathways , Nociceptors/physiology , Nociceptors/physiopathology , Trigeminal Nuclei/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL