Socio-demographic and health-related predictors of uptake of first MMR immunisation in the Lifeways Cohort Study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the uptake of the first dose of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and factors associated with not receiving this vaccine. A cross-generation cohort study was conducted with prospective linkage to primary care and hospital health records in urban and rural settings in Ireland 2001-2004. Seven hundred and forty-nine singleton children were included, with an MMR uptake of 88.7% by the age of 5 years. These data confirm prospectively for the first time that in addition to factors associated with disadvantage, other health practices and beliefs, particularly mother's complementary and alternative medicine use, are associated with decreased MMR uptake (adjusted OR 2.65 (1.76-3.98)). This information suggests that parental attitudes and beliefs regarding vaccines must be considered when developing programmes to improve immunisation uptake.

Determinants of partial or no primary immunisations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if different factors affect children having full, partial or no primary immunisations. METHODS: This was a crossgenerational cohort study with linkage to primary care and hospital records conducted in urban and rural settings in Ireland, recruiting in 2001-2003 with 5-year follow-up. A total of 749 children with immunisation information took part. RESULTS: The uptake of reported primary immunisations was 92.8% full, 4.9% partial and 2.3% no primary immunisations. Adjusted relative risk ratios for children receiving no primary immunisations were significant for: having a mother who had ever visited an alternative practitioner 3.69 (1.05 to 12.9), a mother with means tested full general medical services eligibility 8.11 (1.58 to 41.65), a mother who scored <50 for the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHO-QOL) scale psychological domain 8.82 (1.79 to 43.6) or living in the west of Ireland (rural) 3.64 (1.0 to 13.2). Being born prematurely was associated with partial primary immunisation, adjusted OR 4.63 (1.24 to 17.3). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of these differences will help target campaigns to increase full uptake of primary immunisations.

The North Dublin randomized controlled trial of structured diabetes shared care.

BACKGROUND: A new diabetes shared care service was introduced in North Dublin. It was designed as a randomized controlled trial with a complex intervention comprising education of participating practitioners, the introduction of a community-based diabetes nurse specialist, local agreement on clinical protocols and structured communication across the primary-secondary care interface. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a structured diabetes shared care service in a mixed health care system and to analyse the impact on total patient care. METHODS: A Cluster randomized controlled trial lasting 18 months was carried out in 183 patients with type 2 diabetes from 30 general practices in North Dublin. Biophysical outcomes (HbA1c, blood pressure, body mass index), psychosocial measures (smoking status and Diabetes Clinic Treatment Satisfaction and Diabetes Well-being scores) and process outcomes were collected. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in diabetes care delivery and in psychosocial outcomes, but no significant improvements in biomedical outcomes. Process data collection revealed a significant increase in diabetes care-related activity for participating patients with an increase in structured annual reviews and fewer patients defaulting from care. There were also significant improvements in information exchange between primary and secondary care. CONCLUSION: Structured diabetes shared care, in a mixed health care system, can produce significant improvements in diabetes care delivery and in psychosocial outcomes for patients, with improved information exchange across the primary-secondary care interface.

The North Dublin Diabetes Shared Care (DiSC) Project: a profile of current diabetes care in Ireland.

The DiSC Project aims to assess the feasibility, effectiveness and costs of diabetes shared care in Ireland. Baseline results provide a profile of diabetes care in Ireland. Thirty general practices are participating in this randomised controlled trial. Outcomes include biophysical and psychosocial measures. The majority of patients agreed to participate in diabetes shared care. Data was collected from 183 patients with type 2 diabetes. The mean age of the patients is 65 years, 56% are male and 63% are GMS eligible. The mean HBA1c was 6.8% though 21% of patients had a HBA1c>8%. The majority of patients had a blood pressure, total cholesterol and body mass index above recommended guidelines. Only half the patients are attending a dietician or a chiropodist. The majority of patients have good glycaemic control but poor blood pressure and cholesterol control. The full trial results will determine if a shared care approach can improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes for patients.

Impact of a collaborative immunisation programme in an inner city practice.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of a collaborative immunisation programme, between an inner city practice and the Eastern Health Board (EHB). DESIGN: An observational study using a computer database formed from practice and EHB records. SETTING: One Dublin inner city practice with three partners located in an area with a deprived socio-economic profile. SUBJECTS: All patients in the practice aged more than six months and less than five years identified both from practice registers and opportunistically during study period. RESULTS: 342 children, older than six months and less than five years were identified at start and 464 (a 36% increase) by end of the programme. Uptake changed for DPT from 30% before, to 57% after the programme (p < 0.0005), for DT from 15% to 13%, for Hib from 7% to 50% (p < 0.0005) and for MMR (over 15 months) from 53% to 75% (p < 0.0005). Uptake of the DPT, Hib and MMR was 35% among GMS eligible, 51% among GMS ineligible (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: A collaborative immunisation programme significantly improved practice uptake rates. These improved rates still do not attain declared national targets. To achieve these targets, radical overhaul of the immunisation service is required.