Sintilimab plus chemotherapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer with disease progression after EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy (ORIENT-31): second interim analysis from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the first interim analysis of the ORIENT-31 trial, compared with chemotherapy alone, sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305 plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed and cisplatin) significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment. However, the benefit of anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody added to chemotherapy in this patient population remains unclear, with no prospective evidence from phase 3 trials globally. We report the results from the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival between sintilimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, the updated results of sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy, and preliminary overall survival results. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 52 centres across China and included patients aged 18-75 years with locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, eighth edition) EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC, disease progression after EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 [RECIST 1.1]), and at least one measurable lesion (according to RECIST 1.1). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using an interactive web response system, to receive sintilimab (200 mg) plus IBI305 (15 mg/kg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), sintilimab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for four cycles, followed by maintenance therapy of sintilimab, IBI305, and pemetrexed. All study drugs were administered intravenously. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population assessed by an independent radiographic review committee. Data cutoff was March 31, 2022, unless otherwise specified. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03802240 (ongoing). FINDINGS: Between July 11, 2019, and March 31, 2022, 1011 patients were screened and 476 were randomly assigned (158 to the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 158 to the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 160 to the chemotherapy alone group). The median follow-up duration for progression-free survival was 12·9 months (IQR 8·2-17·8) in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 15·1 months (8·0-19·5) in the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 14·4 months (9·8-23·8) in the chemotherapy alone group. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone (median 5·5 months [95% CI 4·5-6·1] vs 4·3 months [4·1-5·3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72 [95% CI 0·55-0·94]; two-sided p=0·016). Significant progression-free survival benefit was sustained with sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone (median 7·2 months [95% CI 6·6-9·3]; HR: 0·51 [0·39-0·67]; two-sided p<0·0001). As of data cutoff (July 4, 2022), the median overall survival was 21·1 months (95% CI 17·5-23·9) for sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy (HR 0·98 [0·72-1·34]) and 20·5 months (15·8-25·3) for sintilimab plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·97 [0·71-1·32]) versus 19·2 months (15·8-22·4) for chemotherapy alone; after adjusting for crossover, the HR for sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone ranged from 0·79 (0·57-1·09) to 0·84 (0·61-1·15) and the HR for sintilimab plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone ranged from 0·78 (0·57-1·08) to 0·84 (0·61-1·16). The safety results were generally consistent with those in the first interim analysis; in particular, treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 88 (56%) of 158 patients in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 64 (41%) of 156 patients in the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 79 (49%) of 160 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. INTERPRETATION: This is the first prospective phase 3 trial to show the benefit of anti-PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on treatment with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Compared with chemotherapy alone, sintilimab combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin showed significant and clinically meaningful improvement of progression-free survival with an optimal safety profile. Sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy continued to show progression-free survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone in this second interim analysis with an additional 8-month follow-up. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Municipal Science & Technology Commission Research Project, and Innovent Biologics. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305 and chemotherapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy (ORIENT-31): first interim results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: VEGF inhibitors can enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, despite high initial response rates, almost all patients eventually develop treatment resistance to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab with or without IBI305 plus pemetrexed and cisplatin, compared with pemetrexed and cisplatin alone, for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had disease progression after receiving EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial was conducted at 52 hospitals in China. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-75 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and EGFRmut who progressed after receiving a EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 with at least one measurable lesion, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive sintilimab (200 mg) plus IBI305 (15 mg/kg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), sintilimab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin, or pemetrexed and cisplatin (chemotherapy alone) using block randomisation with stratification according to sex and presence or absence of brain metastases. All study drugs were administered intravenously on day 1 of each cycle, once every 3 weeks. Except for cisplatin, which was only given in the first four cycles, treatment was given for 24 months or until disease progression, intolerable toxic effects, withdrawal of consent, death, or other protocol-specified conditions, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. We herein report the first planned interim analysis, with progression-free survival results for the comparison between sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. The progression-free survival results for the sintilimab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin group are immature and not reported here. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03802240 (recruiting). FINDINGS: Between July 11, 2019, and July 31, 2021, 936 patients were screened and 444 were randomly assigned (148 to the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 145 to the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 151 to the chemotherapy alone group). Data cutoff for this interim analysis was July 31, 2021. After a median follow-up of 9·8 months (IQR 4·4-13·3), progression-free survival was significantly longer in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group versus the chemotherapy alone group (median 6·9 months [95% CI 6·0-9.3] vs 4·3 months [4·1-5·4]; hazard ratio 0·46 [0·34-0·64]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (30 [20%] in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group vs 26 [18%] in the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group vs 27 [18%] in the chemotherapy alone group), decreased white blood cell count (17 [11%] vs 12 [8%] vs 13 [9%]), and anaemia (18 [12%] vs ten [7%] vs 15 [10%]). Potentially treatment-related deaths occurred in six patients (intestinal obstruction, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and myelosuppression in one patient each, and three deaths of unknown cause) in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, and in one patient in the chemotherapy alone group (unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: In this interim analysis, sintilimab plus IBI305 plus cisplatin and pemetrexed was generally efficacious and well tolerated in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed after receiving EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy. FUNDING: Innovent Biologics and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study.

BACKGROUND: China has a high burden of hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the main causative factor. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma have a poor prognosis and a substantial unmet clinical need. The phase 2-3 ORIENT-32 study aimed to assess sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus IBI305, a bevacizumab biosimilar, versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study was done at 50 clinical sites in China. Patients aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically diagnosed or clinically confirmed unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, no previous systemic treatment, and a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible for inclusion. In the phase 2 part of the study, patients received intravenous sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus intravenous IBI305 (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks). In the phase 3 part, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either sintilimab plus IBI305 (sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily; sorafenib group), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was done using permuted block randomisation, with a block size of six, via an interactive web response system, and stratified by macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis, baseline α-fetoprotein, and ECOG performance status. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 part of the study was safety, assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The co-primary endpoints of the phase 3 part of the study were overall survival and independent radiological review committee (IRRC)-assessed progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03794440. The study is closed to new participants and follow-up is ongoing for long-term outcomes. FINDINGS: Between Feb 11, 2019 and Jan 15, 2020, we enrolled 595 patients: 24 were enrolled directly into the phase 2 safety run-in and 571 were randomly assigned to sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar (n=380) or sorafenib (n=191). In the phase 2 part of the trial, 24 patients received at least one dose of the study drug, with an objective response rate of 25·0% (95% CI 9·8-46·7). Based on the preliminary safety and activity data of the phase 2 part, in which grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in seven (29%) of 24 patients, the randomised phase 3 part was started. At data cutoff (Aug 15, 2020), the median follow-up was 10·0 months (IQR 8·5-11·7) in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group and 10·0 months (8·4-11·7) in the sorafenib group. Patients in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group had a significantly longer IRRC-assessed median progression-free survival (4·6 months [95% CI 4·1-5·7]) than did patients in the sorafenib group (2·8 months [2·7-3·2]; stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·56, 95% CI 0·46-0·70; p<0·0001). In the first interim analysis of overall survival, sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar showed a significantly longer overall survival than did sorafenib (median not reached [95% CI not reached-not reached] vs 10·4 months [8·5-not reached]; HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·43-0·75; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were hypertension (55 [14%] of 380 patients in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group vs 11 [6%] of 185 patients in the sorafenib group) and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (none vs 22 [12%]). 123 (32%) patients in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group and 36 (19%) patients in the sorafenib group had serious adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events that led to death occurred in six (2%) patients in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group (one patient with abnormal liver function, one patient with both hepatic failure and gastrointestinal haemorrhage, one patient with interstitial lung disease, one patient with both hepatic faliure and hyperkalemia, one patient with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and one patient with intestinal volvulus) and two (1%) patients in the sorafenib group (one patient with gastrointestinal haemorrhage and one patient with death of unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: Sintilimab plus IBI305 showed a significant overall survival and progression-free survival benefit versus sorafenib in the first-line setting for Chinese patients with unresectable, HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma, with an acceptable safety profile. This combination regimen could provide a novel treatment option for such patients. FUNDING: Innovent Biologics. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Capsaicin: A "hot" KDM1A/LSD1 inhibitor from peppers.

Capsaicinoids are plant secondary metabolites, and capsaicin is the main principal that responsible to the pungency of chili peppers, with widely application as food additive. In our study, capsaicin was characterized as lysine specific demethylase 1A (KDM1A/LSD1) inhibitor with IC50 of 0.6 ± 0.0421 µM in biochemical level, and can bind KDM1A recombinant directly and reversibly. Further cellular study confirmed that capsaicin can bind and inhibit KDM1A in gastric cancer cell line BGC-823 and further inhibit cell invasion and migration by reversing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In sum, our findings identified KDM1A as a target of capsaicin and reveals capsaicin as a modifier of histone methylation for the first time, which may provide a new skeleton for further optimization of KDM1A inhibitor.