Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(5): 3322-3334, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34994906

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy appears to increase survival, and normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) could improve overall survival (OS). Furthermore, intraperitoneal epinephrine could decrease the toxicity of chemotherapy by decreasing the systemic absorption of chemotherapy. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of CRS and IPC with intraperitoneal epinephrine, as first-line therapy, on the survival of patients with serous epithelial OC (EOC) with peritoneal metastases. METHODS: A prospective monocentric database was retrospectively searched for all patients with advanced serous EOC treated by interval or consolidative CRS plus IPC with intraperitoneal epinephrine after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OS and disease-free survival (DFS), postoperative complications, and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: From January 2003 to December 2017, 124 patients with serous EOC were treated with interval (n = 58) or consolidative (n = 66) complete CRS plus IPC with intraperitoneal epinephrine. The median follow-up was 77.8 months, the median OS was 60.8 months, and the median DFS was 21.2 months. In our multivariate analysis, a higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and positive lymph node status resulted in worse OS, while higher World Health Organization score, higher PCI score, and positive lymph node status were risk factors for worse DFS. Grade 3 or higher surgical morbidity occurred in 27.42% of cases; only 3.2% had grade 3 renal toxicity and mortality was 0.8%. CONCLUSION: CRS and IPC with intraperitoneal epinephrine in stage III EOC offer good OS and DFS with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates.


Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous , Hyperthermia, Induced , Ovarian Neoplasms , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/secondary , Combined Modality Therapy , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/surgery , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Epinephrine , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
2.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 32(3): 298-310, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26984715

ABSTRACT

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), a strategy combining maximal cytoreductive surgery and maximal regional chemotherapy, has been applied to treat ovarian cancer resulting in long-term survival rates in selected patients. However, the status of HIPEC in ovarian cancer remains an experimental procedure, given the many variables among the data and trials reviewed, to enable us to derive strong conclusions about its role from this overview. In this review we discuss treatment with HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancer and future prospective of its use in clinical setting. HIPEC is an effective tool in the treatment of selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer. Unfortunately, due to the lack of randomised trials, the evidence of HIPEC is very limited. Future randomised studies are awaited to define the role and clinical impact of HIPEC in ovarian cancer.


Subject(s)
Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Hyperthermia, Induced , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Animals , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL