Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(23)2021 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34884931

ABSTRACT

Neuroblastoma is a severe childhood disease, accounting for ~10% of all infant cancers. The amplification of the MYCN gene, coding for the N-Myc transcription factor, is an essential marker correlated with tumor progression and poor prognosis. In neuroblastoma cells, the mitotic kinase Aurora-A (AURKA), also frequently overexpressed in cancer, prevents N-Myc degradation by directly binding to a highly conserved N-Myc region. As a result, elevated levels of N-Myc are observed. During recent years, it has been demonstrated that some ATP competitive inhibitors of AURKA also cause essential conformational changes in the structure of the activation loop of the kinase that prevents N-Myc binding, thus impairing the formation of the AURKA/N-Myc complex. In this study, starting from a screening of crystal structures of AURKA in complexes with known inhibitors, we identified additional compounds affecting the conformation of the kinase activation loop. We assessed the ability of such compounds to disrupt the interaction between AURKA and N-Myc in vitro, using Surface Plasmon Resonance competition assays, and in tumor cell lines overexpressing MYCN, by performing Proximity Ligation Assays. Finally, their effects on N-Myc cellular levels and cell viability were investigated. Our results identify PHA-680626 as an amphosteric inhibitor both in vitro and in MYCN overexpressing cell lines, thus expanding the repertoire of known conformational disrupting inhibitors of the AURKA/N-Myc complex and confirming that altering the conformation of the activation loop of AURKA with a small molecule is an effective strategy to destabilize the AURKA/N-Myc interaction in neuroblastoma cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Aurora Kinase A/metabolism , N-Myc Proto-Oncogene Protein/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , Pyrroles/pharmacology , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Aurora Kinase A/antagonists & inhibitors , Aurora Kinase A/chemistry , Azepines/metabolism , Azepines/pharmacology , Benzazepines/metabolism , Benzazepines/pharmacology , Binding Sites , Binding, Competitive , Cell Line , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Humans , N-Myc Proto-Oncogene Protein/chemistry , Neuroblastoma/drug therapy , Neuroblastoma/metabolism , Protein Conformation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/chemistry , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/metabolism , Pyrazoles/metabolism , Pyrimidines/metabolism , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , Pyrroles/metabolism , Surface Plasmon Resonance
2.
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel ; 12(4): 533-42, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19562649

ABSTRACT

The development of Aurora kinase inhibitors is a competitive research field, with many inhibitors currently being evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies. Progress during the past few years, both preclinically and clinically, has increased the evidence supporting Aurora kinases as promising molecular targets for the treatment of cancer. Aurora kinase inhibitors differ based on their selectivity within the Aurora kinase family and their cross-reactivities with other kinases. Additional factors that will contribute to the success or failure of the Aurora kinase inhibitors include: routes of administration, drug-like properties, workable combinations with approved drugs, adequate clinical development paths, and the identification of the appropriate patient population. The clinical trial results that are emerging for the most advanced inhibitors are promising, and it is probable that clinical proof of concept will be achieved, and that Aurora kinase inhibitors will be part of treatment for cancer in the future.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Drug Design , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Aurora Kinases , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , Molecular Structure , Neoplasms/enzymology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/chemistry , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
3.
Expert Opin Ther Targets ; 12(1): 69-80, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18076371

ABSTRACT

Aurora kinases are key regulators of mitosis and inhibitors being developed by a wide range of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for the treatment of cancer. Tumor cells respond differentially on inhibition of different Aurora kinase family members and these differences have to be considered in the clinical development of small-molecule inhibitors with respect to the chosen indications, the schedules or the selection of appropriate end points and they should also guide the development of biomarkers. Preclinical validation of potential biomarkers for Aurora kinase inhibitors led to a first application in clinical trials, as exemplified for the phosphorylation of histone H3 to follow Aurora-B inhibition. This review discusses the criteria for translation into the clinic and the value of pharmacodynamic biomarkers and their potential, but also their limitations to be used as surrogate markers for clinical end points.


Subject(s)
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Animals , Aurora Kinase B , Aurora Kinases , Biomarkers/metabolism , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Humans , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL