Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 11339, 2021 05 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34059725

ABSTRACT

The emergence of polymyxin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria infections has motivated the use of combination therapy. This study determined the mutant selection window (MSW) of polymyxin B alone and in combination with meropenem and fosfomycin against A. baumannii strains belonging to clonal lineages I and III. To evaluate the inhibition of in vitro drug resistance, we investigate the MSW-derived pharmacodynamic indices associated with resistance to polymyxin B administrated regimens as monotherapy and combination therapy, such as the percentage of each dosage interval that free plasma concentration was within the MSW (%TMSW) and the percentage of each dosage interval that free plasma concentration exceeded the mutant prevention concentration (%T>MPC). The MSW of polymyxin B varied between 1 and 16 µg/mL for polymyxin B-susceptible strains. The triple combination of polymyxin B with meropenem and fosfomycin inhibited the polymyxin B-resistant subpopulation in meropenem-resistant isolates and polymyxin B plus meropenem as a double combination sufficiently inhibited meropenem-intermediate, and susceptible strains. T>MPC 90% was reached for polymyxin B in these combinations, while %TMSW was 0 against all strains. TMSW for meropenem and fosfomycin were also reduced. Effective antimicrobial combinations significantly reduced MSW. The MSW-derived pharmacodynamic indices can be used for the selection of effective combination regimen to combat the polymyxin B-resistant strain.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Polymyxin B/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymyxin B/pharmacology
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 47(5): 380-5, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27068675

ABSTRACT

In this study, the activity of meropenem (MEM), fosfomycin (FOF) and polymyxin B (PMB), alone and in combination, was analysed. In addition, optimisation of the pharmacodynamic index of MEM and FOF against six isolates of OXA-23-producing Acinetobacter baumannii (including three resistant to PMB) that were not clonally related was assessed. Antimicrobial combinations were evaluated by chequerboard analysis and were considered synergistic when the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was ≤0.5. Pharmacodynamic analyses of the MEM and FOF dosing schemes were performed by Monte Carlo simulation. The target pharmacodynamic index (%ƒT>MIC) for MEM and FOF was ≥40% and ≥70%, respectively, and a probability of target attainment (PTA) ≥0.9 was considered adequate. Among the PMB-resistant isolates, combinations of PMB+MEM and PMB+FOF+MEM showed the highest synergistic activity (FICI ≤0.125); isolates that were previously PMB-resistant were included in the susceptible category using CLSI interpretive criteria. Pharmacodynamic evaluation found that for a FOF minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤16µg/mL, treatment both by bolus dosing and prolonged infusion achieved adequate PTA, whilst for MIC=32µg/mL only infusion achieved adequate PTA. For a MEM MIC of 4µg/mL, only the bolus treatment scheme with 1.5g q6h and the infusion schemes with 1.0g q8h, 1.5g q6h and 2.0g q8h achieved PTA ≥0.9. Results of antimicrobial and pharmacodynamic analyses can assist in treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. However, in vivo clinical studies are essential to evaluate the true role of these compounds, including intravenous antimicrobial FOF therapy.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Drug Synergism , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Polymyxin B/pharmacology , Thienamycins/pharmacology , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Fosfomycin/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Monte Carlo Method , Polymyxin B/pharmacokinetics , Thienamycins/pharmacokinetics
3.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 38(5): 447-50, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21872449

ABSTRACT

The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains has made it difficult to treat infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In order to develop new alternative therapies for the treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa infections, the antimicrobial activities of different antibiotic combinations have been studied in vitro and in vivo. In this study, the in vitro antimicrobial activities of six different combinations of polymyxins and ß-lactams against 34 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were evaluated. For the combinations tested by the checkerboard method, an indifferent effect was observed for all strains. However, 27 strains (19 MDR) showed reductions in their minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for at least one of the antibiotics in the combinations evaluated. Combination with polymyxins resulted in reductions of the ß-lactam MICs, with a change in the resistance category to susceptible in eight MDR strains. These results from the in vitro evaluation suggest that combinations of polymyxins and ß-lactams may significantly reduce the MICs of the antibiotics tested. These combinations require further evaluation for use in medical practice.


Subject(s)
Colistin/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Polymyxins/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , beta-Lactams/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL