Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 38(1): 144-151, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33557636

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) may enhance the tumor response, although the effectiveness of combined neoadjuvant therapy remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the role of mEHT with neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data were analyzed for 120 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/4 or N+, M0) from May 2012 to December 2017. Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil was administered along with radiotherapy. Patients were categorized into mEHT group (62 patients) and non-mEHT group (58 patients) depending on whether mEHT was added. Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after the end of radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years (range, 33-83). The median radiation dose was significantly less for mEHT group (40 Gy) than for non-mEHT group (50.4 Gy). In mEHT group, 80.7% showed down-staging compared with 67.2% in non-mEHT group. For large tumors of more than 65 cm³ (mean), improved tumor regression was observed in 31.6% of mEHT group compared with 0% of non-mEHT group (p = .024). The gastrointestinal toxicity rate of mEHT group was 64.5%, which was found to be statistically significantly less than 87.9% of non-mEHT group (p = .010). The 2-year disease-free survival was 96% for mEHT group and 79% for non-mEHT group (p = .054). CONCLUSION: The overall mEHT group had a comparable response and survival using less radiation dosing compared with standard care; the subgroup with large tumors showed improved efficacy for tumor regression after mEHT.


Subject(s)
Hyperthermia, Induced , Rectal Neoplasms , Fluorouracil , Humans , Hyperthermia , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies
2.
Radiat Oncol J ; 38(4): 236-243, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33389980

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The details of breast reconstruction and radiation therapy (RT) vary between institutions; therefore, we sought to investigate the practice patterns of radiation oncologists who specialize in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified the practice patterns and inter-hospital variations from a multi-center cohort of women with breast cancer who underwent post-mastectomy RT (PMRT) to the reconstructed breast at 16 institutions between 2015 and 2016. The institutions were requested to contour the target volume and produce RT plans for one representative case with five different clinical scenarios and answer questionnaires which elicited infrastructural information. We assessed the inter-institutional variations in RT in terms of the target, normal organ delineation, and dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: Three hundred fourteen patients were included; 99% of them underwent immediate reconstruction. The most irradiated material was tissue expander (36.9%) followed by transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (23.9%) and silicone implant (12.1%). In prosthetic-based reconstruction with tissue expander, most patients received PMRT following partial deflation. Conventional fractionation and hypofractionation RT were used in 66.6% and 33.4% patients, respectively (commonest: 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions [17.5%]). Furthermore, 15.6% of the patients received boost RT and 53.5% were treated with bolus. Overall, 15 physicians responded to the questionnaires and six submitted their contours and RT plans. There was a significant variability in target delineations and RT plans between physicians, and between clinical scenarios. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant RT following post-mastectomy reconstruction has become a common practice in Korea. The details vary significantly between institutions, which highlights an urgent need for standard protocol in this clinical setting.

3.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 31(7): 784-92, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26367194

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT), also known as oncothermia, shows remarkable treatment efficacies for various types of tumours, including glioma. The aim of the present study was to investigate the molecular mechanism underlying phenotypic changes in oncothermic cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: U87-MG and A172 human glioma cells were exposed to mEHT (42 °C/60 min) three times with a 2-day interval and subsequently tested for growth inhibition using MTS, FACS and microscopic analysis. To obtain insights into the molecular changes in response to mEHT, global changes in gene expression were examined using RNA sequencing. For in vivo evaluation of mEHT, we used U87-MG glioma xenografts grown in nude mice. RESULTS: mEHT inhibited glioma cell growth through the strong induction of apoptosis. The transcriptomic analysis of differential gene expression under mEHT showed that the anti-proliferative effects were induced through a subset of molecular alterations, including the up-regulation of E2F1 and CPSF2 and the down-regulation of ADAR and PSAT1. Subsequent Western blotting revealed that mEHT increased the levels of E2F1 and p53 and decreased the level of PARP-1, accelerating apoptotic signalling in glioma cells. mEHT significantly suppressed the growth of human glioma xenografts in nude mice. We also observed that mEHT dramatically reduced the portion of CD133(+) glioma stem cell population and suppressed cancer cell migration and sphere formation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that mEHT suppresses glioma cell proliferation and mobility through the induction of E2F1-mediated apoptosis and might be an effective treatment for eradicating brain tumours.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/physiology , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , E2F1 Transcription Factor/physiology , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Glioma/therapy , Hyperthermia, Induced/methods , Animals , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Flow Cytometry , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Mice , Mice, Nude
4.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 44(6): 534-40, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24771865

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the effects of radiotherapy ≥60 Gy in the setting of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for treating patients with Stages II-III esophageal cancer. METHODS: A total of 126 patients treated with 5-fluorouracilbased concurrent chemo-radiotherapy between January 1998 and February 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 49 received a total radiation dose of <60 Gy (standard-dose group), while 77 received a total radiation dose of ≥60 Gy (high-dose group). The median doses in the standard- and high-dose groups were 54 Gy (range, 45-59.4 Gy) and 63 Gy (range, 60-81 Gy), respectively. RESULTS: The high-dose group showed significantly improved locoregional control (2-year locoregional control rate, 69 versus 32%, P < 0.01) and progression-free survival (2-year progression-free survival, 47 versus 20%, P = 0.01) than the standard-dose group. Median overall survival in the high- and the standard-dose groups was 28 and 18 months, respectively (P = 0.26). In multivariate analysis, 60 Gy or higher radiotherapy was a significant prognostic factor for improved locoregional control, progression-free survival and overall survival. No significant differences were found in frequencies of late radiation pneumonitis, post-treatment esophageal stricture or treatment-related mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose radiotherapy of 60 Gy or higher with concurrent chemotherapy improved locoregional control and progression-free survival without a significant increase of in treatment-related toxicity in patients with Stages II-III esophageal cancer. Our study could provide the basis for future randomized clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Docetaxel , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Drug Administration Schedule , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Stenosis/etiology , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Platinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Radiation Pneumonitis/etiology , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
5.
Yonsei Med J ; 54(5): 1178-85, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23918567

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Sorafenib is an effective systemic agent for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. To increase its efficacy, we evaluated the feasibility and benefit of sorafenib combined with radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2007 to July 2011, 31 patients were treated with a daily dose of 800 mg of sorafenib and radiotherapy. Among them, 13 patients who received radiotherapy on the bone metastasis were excluded. Thirteen patients received 30-54 Gy of radiotherapy on the primary tumor (primary group) and 5 patients received 30-58.4 Gy on the measurable metastatic lesions (measurable metastasis group). Tumor responses at 1 month after the completion of radiotherapy and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The in-field response rate was 100% in the primary group and 60% in the measurable metastasis group. A decrease of more than 80% in the tumor marker α-fetoprotein was observed in 7 patients in the primary group (54%). Toxicities of grades 3-4 were hand-foot syndrome in 3 (17%) patients, duodenal bleeding in 1 (6%) patient, thrombocytopenia in 3 (17%) patients and elevation of aspartate transaminase in 1 (6%) patient. The median overall survival was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval, 3.0-12.6). CONCLUSION: The combined treatment of sorafenib and radiotherapy was feasible and induced substantial tumor responses in the target lesions. The results of this study emphasize the importance of individualized approach in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and encourage the initiation of a controlled clinical trial.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Niacinamide/administration & dosage , Niacinamide/adverse effects , Niacinamide/therapeutic use , Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Sorafenib
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL