Prognosis and treatment pattern of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of first-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment.

BACKGROUND: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) has become the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the prognosis and treatment pattern after its treatment failure are unclear. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who failed first-line Atezo-Bev treatment for advanced HCC from January 2018 to May 2021 in four Taiwan medical centers. Post-first-line survival (PFLS) was defined as the date from the failure of Atezo-Bev treatment to the date of death or last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were included in the study. All patients had Child-Pugh A liver reserve before the initiation of Atezo-Bev treatment, but the liver reserve of 6 (15%) and 7 (17%) patients deteriorated to Child-Pugh B and C, respectively, after treatment failure. The median PFLS was 5.9 months. PFLS significantly differed among patients with various liver reserves after the failure of Atezo-Bev treatment (median 9.6 vs 3.8 vs 1.2 months, for Child-Pugh A, B, and C; p < 0.001). In total, 30 (73%) patients received second-line systemic therapy, and they exhibited significantly longer PFLS (median 8.0 vs 1.8 months, p = 0.033) than patients who did not. Deteriorated liver function and not receiving second-line therapy remained associated with inferior PFLS in multivariate analysis. The most common second-line therapies were sorafenib (n = 19, 63%) and lenvatinib (n = 9, 30%), with no significant differences in efficacies. CONCLUSION: Receiving second-line therapy and good liver reserve were associated with favorable PFLS after the failure of first-line Atezo-Bev treatment.

Upregulation of USP22 and ABCC1 during Sorafenib Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Contribute to Development of Resistance.

Sorafenib is a small molecule that blocks tumor proliferation by targeting the activity of multi-kinases for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Increasing sorafenib resistance following long-term treatment is frequently encountered. Mechanisms underlying sorafenib resistance remain not completely clear. To further understand the mechanism of sorafenib resistance in HCC, we established sorafenib-resistant cell lines by slowly increasing sorafenib concentration in cell culture medium. Upregulation of USP22 and ABCC1 were found in Sorafenib-resistant cells. Sorafenib-resistant cells treated with USP22 siRNA showed significant reduction in endogenous mRNA and protein levels of ABCC1. During sorafenib treatment, upregulation of USP22 increases ABCC1 expression and subsequently contributes to sorafenib resistance in HCC cells. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a positive correlation between USP22 and ABCC1 expression in tissue samples from sorafenib-resistant patients (Pearson's correlation = 0.59, p = 0.03). Our findings indicate that upregulation of USP22 and ABCC1 expression during treatment contribute to sorafenib resistance in HCC cells and that USP22 has strong potential as a therapeutic target for overcoming sorafenib resistance in HCC patients.

Anti-PD-1 combined sorafenib versus anti-PD-1 alone in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matching study.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a role in the tumor microenvironment. Sorafenib, which inhibits the VEGF pathway, has an immune-modulation function but lacks substantial clinical data. This study aims to explore the efficacy of anti-PD-1 combined sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: HCC patients who underwent anti-PD-1 treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) between January 2016 and February 2019 were reviewed. The efficacy was compared between groups after propensity-score matching. RESULTS: There were 173 HCC patients receiving anti-PD-1. After excluding unsuitable cases, 140 patients were analyzed, of which 58 received combination therapy and 82 received anti-PD-1 alone. The combination therapy had a trend of higher CR rate (8.6% vs. 4.9%, ns.), ORR (22.4% vs. 19.5%, ns.) and significantly higher DCR (69.0% vs. 37.8%, p < 0.05) comparing to anti-PD-1 alone. After matching, combination group achieved longer progression-free survival (3.87 vs. 2.43 months, p < 0.05) and overall survival (not reached vs. 7.17 months, p < 0.05) than anti-PD-1 alone, without higher grade 3/4 AE (10.3% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.73). The tumor response varied among different metastatic sites, with high responses in adrenal glands, peritoneum and lungs. The more AFP declined (> 10, > 50 and > 66%), the higher the ORR (70, 80 and 92%) and CR rates (30, 35 and 58%) were achieved at day 28. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the combination of anti-PD-1 and sorafenib had better efficacy and survival benefit. A prospective randomized study is needed to confirm this finding.