Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Biochem Pharmacol ; 181: 114149, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32663453

ABSTRACT

Snake venoms consist of a complex mixture of many bioactive molecules. Among them are disintegrins, which are peptides without enzymatic activity, but with high binding affinity for integrins, transmembrane receptors that function to connect cells with components of the extracellular matrix. Integrin-mediated cell attachment is critical for cell migration and dissemination, as well as for signal transduction pathways involved in cell growth. During tumor development, integrins play key roles by supporting cancer cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis. The recognition that snake venom disintegrins can block integrin functions has spawned a number of studies to explore their cancer therapeutic potential. While dozens of different disintegrins have been isolated, none of them as yet has undergone clinical evaluation in cancer patients. Among the best-characterized and preclinically most advanced disintegrins is vicrostatin (VCN), a recombinant disintegrin that was rationally designed by fusing 62 N-terminal amino acids derived from the disintegrin contortrostatin with 6 C-terminal amino acids from echistatin, the disintegrins from another snake species. Bacterially produced VCN was shown to target multiple tumor-associated integrins, achieving potent anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic effects in in vitro and in vivo models in the absence of noticeable toxicity. This review will introduce the field of snake venom disintegrins as potential anticancer agents and illustrate the translational development and cancer-therapeutic potential of VCN as an example.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Disintegrins/pharmacology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Disintegrins/chemistry , Disintegrins/therapeutic use , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/chemistry , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/pharmacology , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Snake Venoms/chemistry , Snake Venoms/metabolism
2.
Cancer Lett ; 400: 161-174, 2017 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28450161

ABSTRACT

The anticancer agent 3-bromopyruvate (3-BP) is viewed as a glycolytic inhibitor that preferentially kills glycolytic cancer cells through energy depletion. However, its cytotoxic activity is dependent on cellular drug import through transmembrane monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT-1), which restricts its anticancer potential to MCT-1-positive tumor cells. We created and characterized an MCT-1-independent analog of 3-BP, called NEO218. NEO218 was synthesized by covalently conjugating 3-BP to perillyl alcohol (POH), a natural monoterpene. The responses of various tumor cell lines to treatment with either compound were characterized in the presence or absence of supplemental pyruvate or antioxidants N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) and glutathione (GSH). Drug effects on glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) enzyme activity were investigated by mass spectrometric analysis. The development of 3-BP resistance was investigated in MCT-1-positive HCT116 colon carcinoma cells in vitro. Our results show that NEO218: (i) pyruvylated GAPDH on all 4 of its cysteine residues and shut down enzymatic activity; (ii) severely lowered cellular ATP content below life-sustaining levels, and (iii) triggered rapid necrosis. Intriguingly, supplemental antioxidants effectively prevented cytotoxic activity of NEO218 as well as 3-BP, but supplemental pyruvate powerfully protected cells only from 3-BP, not from NEO218. Unlike 3-BP, NEO218 exerted its potent cytotoxic activity irrespective of cellular MCT-1 status. Treatment of HCT116 cells with 3-BP resulted in prompt development of resistance, based on the emergence of MCT-1-negative cells. This was not the case with NEO218, and highly 3-BP-resistant cells remained exquisitely sensitive to NEO218. Thus, our study identifies a mechanism by which tumor cells develop rapid resistance to 3-BP, and presents NEO218 as a superior agent not subject to this cellular defense. Furthermore, our results offer alternative interpretations of previously published models on the role of supplemental antioxidants: Rather than quenching reactive oxygen species (ROS), supplemental NAC or GSH directly interact with 3-BP, thereby neutralizing the drug's cytotoxic potential before it can trigger ROS production. Altogether, our study introduces new aspects of the cytotoxic mechanism of 3-BP, and characterizes NEO218 as an analog able to overcome a key cellular defense mechanism towards this drug.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Monocarboxylic Acid Transporters/metabolism , Monoterpenes/pharmacology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyruvates/pharmacology , Symporters/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Alkylation , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases , Glycolysis/drug effects , HCT116 Cells , Humans , MCF-7 Cells , Monocarboxylic Acid Transporters/genetics , Necrosis , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , RNA Interference , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Symporters/genetics , Transfection
3.
JAMA ; 314(23): 2535-43, 2015 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670971

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Glioblastoma is the most devastating primary malignancy of the central nervous system in adults. Most patients die within 1 to 2 years of diagnosis. Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are a locoregionally delivered antimitotic treatment that interferes with cell division and organelle assembly. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTFields used in combination with temozolomide maintenance treatment after chemoradiation therapy for patients with glioblastoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: After completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients with glioblastoma were randomized (2:1) to receive maintenance treatment with either TTFields plus temozolomide (n = 466) or temozolomide alone (n = 229) (median time from diagnosis to randomization, 3.8 months in both groups). The study enrolled 695 of the planned 700 patients between July 2009 and November 2014 at 83 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, and South Korea. The trial was terminated based on the results of this planned interim analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with TTFields was delivered continuously (>18 hours/day) via 4 transducer arrays placed on the shaved scalp and connected to a portable medical device. Temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2/d) was given for 5 days of each 28-day cycle. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population (significance threshold of .01) with overall survival in the per-protocol population (n = 280) as a powered secondary end point (significance threshold of .006). This prespecified interim analysis was to be conducted on the first 315 patients after at least 18 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The interim analysis included 210 patients randomized to TTFields plus temozolomide and 105 randomized to temozolomide alone, and was conducted at a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 18-60 months). Median progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.2 months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.3-5.2 months) in the temozolomide alone group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [98.7% CI, 0.43-0.89]; P = .001). Median overall survival in the per-protocol population was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.7-25.0 months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group (n = 196) and 15.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.1 months) in the temozolomide alone group (n = 84) (HR, 0.64 [99.4% CI, 0.42-0.98]; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this interim analysis of 315 patients with glioblastoma who had completed standard chemoradiation therapy, adding TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Dacarbazine/analogs & derivatives , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Glioblastoma/therapy , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Canada , Carmustine/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Early Termination of Clinical Trials , Electric Stimulation Therapy/adverse effects , Europe , Female , Glioblastoma/mortality , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea , Temozolomide , United States , Young Adult
4.
Am J Cancer Res ; 5(5): 1580-93, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26175929

ABSTRACT

Perillyl alcohol (POH) is a naturally occurring dietary monoterpene isolated from the essential oils of lavender, peppermint, and other plants. Medical interest in this compound was generated by research findings showing that POH was able to inhibit the growth of tumor cells in cell culture and exert cancer preventive and therapeutic activity in a variety of animal tumor models. Based on this promising preclinical work, POH was formulated in soft gelatine capsules and orally administered to cancer patients several times a day on a continuous basis. However, such clinical trials in humans yielded disappointing results, also because the large number of capsules that had to be swallowed caused hard-to-tolerate intestinal side effects, causing many patients to withdraw from treatment due to unrelenting nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. As a result, efforts to treat cancer patients with oral POH were abandoned and did not enter clinical practice. Intriguingly, clinical trials in Brazil have explored intranasal POH delivery as an alternative to circumvent the toxic limitations of oral administration. In these trials, patients with recurrent malignant gliomas were given comparatively small doses of POH via simple inhalation through the nose. Results from these studies show this type of long-term, daily chemotherapy to be well tolerated and effective. In this review, we will present the vicissitudes of POH's evaluation as an anticancer agent, and its most recent success in therapy of patients with malignant brain tumors.

5.
Curr Pharm Des ; 17(23): 2428-38, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21827419

ABSTRACT

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response represents a cellular "yin-yang" process, where low to moderate activity is cell protective and supports chemoresistance (yang), but where more severe conditions will aggravate these mechanisms to the point where they abandon their protective efforts and instead turn on a cell death program (yin). Because tumor cells frequently experience chronic stress conditions (due to hypoxia, hypoglycemia, acidification, etc.), the protective yang components of their ER stress response are continuously engaged and thus less able to neutralize additional insults taxing the ER stress response. This tumor-specific situation may provide therapeutic opportunities for pharmacologic intervention, where further aggravation of ER stress would lead to the activation of pro-apoptotic yin components and result in tumor cell death. This review will describe the yin-yang principle of ER stress, and will present pharmacologic agents and combination strategies aimed at exploiting the ER stress response for improved therapeutic outcomes, particularly in the setting of difficult to treat tumor types such as glioblastoma.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Design , Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress/drug effects , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Yin-Yang , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Brain Neoplasms/blood supply , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Glioblastoma/blood supply , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Humans
6.
Cancer Lett ; 302(2): 100-8, 2011 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21257259

ABSTRACT

The alkylating agent temozolomide, in combination with surgery and radiation, is the current standard of care for patients with glioblastoma. However, despite this extensive therapeutic effort, the inclusion of temozolomide extends survival only by a few short months. Among the factors contributing to chemoresistance is elevated expression of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone GRP78 (glucose-regulated protein 78; BiP), a key pro-survival component of the ER stress response system. Because the green tea component EGCG (epigallocatechin 3-gallate) had been shown to inhibit GRP78 function, we investigated whether this polyphenolic agent would be able to increase the therapeutic efficacy of temozolomide in preclinical models of glioblastoma. Mice with intracranially implanted human U87 (p53 wild type) or U251 (p53 mutant) glioblastoma cells were treated with temozolomide and EGCG, alone and in combination. We found that EGCG alone did not provide survival benefit, but significantly improved the existing therapeutic effect of temozolomide, i.e., life extension was substantially greater under combination therapy as compared to temozolomide therapy alone. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor tissue revealed increased expression levels of GRP78 in temozolomide-treated animals, which was diminished when temozolomide was combined with EGCG. Parallel in vitro experiments with siRNA targeting GRP78 or its major pro-apoptotic antagonist CHOP (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein homologous protein/GADD153) further established a critical role of the ER stress response system, where si-GRP78 sensitized cells to treatment with temozolomide, and si-CHOP provided protection from drug-induced toxicity. Thus, ER stress-regulatory components affect the chemotherapeutic response of glioblastoma cells to treatment with temozolomide, and inclusion of EGCG is able to increase the therapeutic efficacy of this DNA-damaging agent.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Camellia sinensis/chemistry , Catechin/analogs & derivatives , Dacarbazine/analogs & derivatives , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Catechin/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Synergism , Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiP , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Temozolomide
7.
Blood ; 113(23): 5927-37, 2009 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19190249

ABSTRACT

The anticancer potency of green tea and its individual components is being intensely investigated, and some cancer patients already self-medicate with this "miracle herb" in hopes of augmenting the anticancer outcome of their chemotherapy. Bortezomib (BZM) is a proteasome inhibitor in clinical use for multiple myeloma. Here, we investigated whether the combination of these compounds would yield increased antitumor efficacy in multiple myeloma and glioblastoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Unexpectedly, we discovered that various green tea constituents, in particular (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and other polyphenols with 1,2-benzenediol moieties, effectively prevented tumor cell death induced by BZM in vitro and in vivo. This pronounced antagonistic function of EGCG was evident only with boronic acid-based proteasome inhibitors (BZM, MG-262, PS-IX), but not with several non-boronic acid proteasome inhibitors (MG-132, PS-I, nelfinavir). EGCG directly reacted with BZM and blocked its proteasome inhibitory function; as a consequence, BZM could not trigger endoplasmic reticulum stress or caspase-7 activation, and did not induce tumor cell death. Taken together, our results indicate that green tea polyphenols may have the potential to negate the therapeutic efficacy of BZM and suggest that consumption of green tea products may be contraindicated during cancer therapy with BZM.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/antagonists & inhibitors , Boronic Acids/antagonists & inhibitors , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Flavonoids/pharmacology , Phenols/pharmacology , Proteasome Inhibitors , Pyrazines/antagonists & inhibitors , Tea/chemistry , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Boronic Acids/chemistry , Boronic Acids/pharmacology , Bortezomib , Cell Line, Tumor , Color , Cytoprotection/drug effects , Endoplasmic Reticulum/drug effects , Enzyme Inhibitors/chemistry , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Mice , Mice, Nude , Molecular Structure , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Polyphenols , Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex/metabolism , Pyrazines/pharmacology , Stress, Physiological/drug effects
8.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 17(2): 197-208, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18230053

ABSTRACT

Celecoxib is an NSAID that was developed as a selective inhibitor of COX-2 and approved by the FDA for the treatment of various forms of arthritis and the management of acute or chronic pain. In addition, it was more recently approved as an oral adjunct to prevent colon cancer development in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and is presently being investigated for its chemotherapeutic potential in the therapy of advanced cancers. However, in laboratory studies it was discovered that celecoxib was able to suppress tumor growth in the absence of any apparent involvement of COX-2, and additional pharmacologic activities associated with this drug were found. Intriguingly, the two pharmacologic effects, inhibition of COX-2 and suppression of tumor growth, were found to reside in different structural aspects of the celecoxib molecule and, therefore, could be separated. This dualism enabled the synthesis of close structural analogs of celecoxib that exhibited increased antitumor potency in the absence of COX-2 inhibition. In theory, such compounds should be superior to celecoxib for antitumor purposes because they might reduce gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks and the life-threatening side effects that appear during the long-term use of selective COX-2 inhibitors. In this review, the authors present the status of preclinical development of anticancer analogs of celecoxib that are COX-2 inactive, with an emphasis on 2,5-dimethyl-celecoxib (DMC) and OSU-03012.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Celecoxib , Cyclooxygenase 2 , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/pharmacokinetics , Sulfonamides/pharmacokinetics
9.
Cancer ; 97(9 Suppl): 2363-73, 2003 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12712458

ABSTRACT

The topoisomerase-I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11) is currently used in Phase I/II trials for the treatment of patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. Protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors such as high-dose tamoxifen and hypericin also have been used in the treatment of malignant gliomas. The current study examined the role of PKC inhibitors as chemosensitizers for CPT-11 and their proposed mechanism of action. Two glioma cell lines (A-172 and U-87) and one primary glioma cell culture (LA-567) were used. Proliferation ((3)H-thymidine) and cytotoxicity (methylthiotetrazole) studies were performed using CPT-11 (0-100 microM) alone, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy camptothecin (SN-38) (0-1000 nM) alone or in the presence of a PKC inhibitor, tamoxifen (10 microM), hypericin (10 microM), calphositin C (400 nM), or staurosporine (10 nM). The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling(TUNEL) assay was used to determine apoptosis as the mechanism of cytotoxicity; alterations in bcl-2 and bax expression were determined using Western blot analysis. Conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38 by glioma cells was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Increasing CPT-11 and SN-38 concentrations induced cytotoxic morphologic changes, decreased proliferation, and increased cytotoxicity on all glioma cell lines tested. These changes were increased in the presence of a PKC inhibitor. The mechanism of the cytotoxicity was determined to be apoptosis by the TUNEL assay. The combination of a PKC inhibitor with CPT-11 or SN-38 led to decreased expression of the antiapoptotic protein bcl-2, and increased expression of the proapoptotic protein bax. HPLC analysis demonstrated conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38 by glioma cells. A combination of CPT-11 or SN-38 with a PKC inhibitor was found to lead to a decrease in proliferation and an increase in apoptosis in malignant glioma cells. The induction of apoptosis was secondary to a decrease in bcl-2 and an increase in bax expression. Glioma cells are capable of converting CPT-11 to SN-38 by intrinsic tumor carboxylesterases.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Perylene/analogs & derivatives , Protein Kinase C/antagonists & inhibitors , Anthracenes , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Apoptosis , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Camptothecin/pharmacokinetics , Camptothecin/pharmacology , Cell Line , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Irinotecan , Naphthalenes/administration & dosage , Perylene/administration & dosage , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/analysis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/analysis , Staurosporine/administration & dosage , Tamoxifen/administration & dosage , Tumor Cells, Cultured , bcl-2-Associated X Protein
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL