Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Aust Health Rev ; 42(2): 230-238, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28384435

ABSTRACT

Developing high-quality and culturally responsive maternal and infant health services is a critical part of 'closing the gap' in health disparities between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and other Australians. The National Maternity Services Plan led work that describes and recommends Birthing on Country best-practice maternity care adaptable from urban to very remote settings, yet few examples exist in Australia. This paper demonstrates Birthing on Country principles can be applied in the urban setting, presenting our experience establishing and developing a Birthing on Country partnership service model in Brisbane, Australia. An initial World Café workshop effectively engaged stakeholders, consumers and community members in service planning, resulting in a multiagency partnership program between a large inner city hospital and two local Aboriginal Community-Controlled Health Services (ACCHS). The Birthing in Our Community program includes: 24/7 midwifery care in pregnancy to six weeks postnatal by a named midwife, supported by Indigenous health workers and a team coordinator; partnership with the ACCHS; oversight from a steering committee, including Indigenous governance; clinical and cultural supervision; monthly cultural education days; and support for Indigenous student midwives through cadetships and placement within the partnership. Three years in, the partnership program is proving successful with clients, as well as showing early signs of improved maternal and infant health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services, Indigenous/organization & administration , Interinstitutional Relations , Interprofessional Relations , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Cultural Competency , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Midwifery , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Pregnancy , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Queensland , Stakeholder Participation , Urban Population
2.
BMC Public Health ; 14: 920, 2014 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25192713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although Indigenous Australians are over-represented among heroin users, there has been no study examining offending, time in custody, and opioid substitution therapy (OST) treatment utilisation among Indigenous opioid-dependent (including heroin) people at the population level, nor comparing these to non-Indigenous opioid-dependent people. The aims of this study were to compare the nature and types of charges, time in custody and OST treatment utilisation between opioid-dependent Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians in contact with the criminal justice system. METHODS: This was a population-based, retrospective data linkage study using records of OST entrants in New South Wales, Australia (1985-2010), court appearances (1993-2011) and custody episodes (2000-2012). Charge rates per 100 person-years were compared between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians by sex, age and calendar year. Statistical comparisons were made for variables describing the cumulative time and percentage of follow-up time spent in custody, as well as characteristics of OST initiation and overall OST treatment utilisation. RESULTS: Of the 34,962 people in the cohort, 6,830 (19.5%) were Indigenous and 28,132 (80.5%) non-Indigenous. Among the 6,830 Indigenous people, 4,615 (67.6%) were male and 2,215 (32.4%) female. The median number of charges per person against Indigenous people (25, IQR 31) was significantly greater than non-Indigenous people (9, IQR 16) (p < 0.001). Overall, Indigenous people were charged with 33.2% of the total number of charges against the cohort and 44.0% of all violent offences. The median percentage of follow-up time that Indigenous males and females spent in custody was twice that of non-Indigenous males (21.7% vs. 10.1%, p < 0.001) and females (6.0% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001). The percentage of Indigenous people who first commenced OST in prison (30.2%) was three times that of non-Indigenous people (11.2%) (p < 0.001). Indigenous males spent less time in OST compared to non-Indigenous males (median percentage of follow-up time in treatment: 40.5% vs. 43.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to non-Indigenous opioid-dependent people, Indigenous opioid-dependent people in contact with the criminal justice system are charged with a greater number of offences, spend longer in custody and commonly initiate OST in prison. Hence, contact with the criminal justice system provides an important opportunity to engage Indigenous people in OST.


Subject(s)
Criminal Law , Criminals , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Opioid-Related Disorders/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 35(1): 38-46, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21299699

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe and critique methodological aspects of interventions targeting reductions in smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol misuse and physical inactivity (SNAP risk factors) among Indigenous Australians. METHODS: An electronic search of eight databases and a manual search of reference lists of literature reviews and reference libraries for Indigenous-specific intervention studies published in peer-reviewed journals (January 1990 to August 2007) were undertaken. Alcohol, smoking, nutrition or physical activity needed to be the primary focus of the study and the intervention needed to specifically target Indigenous Australians. RESULTS: Twenty studies were selected for inclusion in the review. Methodologically, few studies employed randomisation or a control group, most omitted important details (e.g. costs), some did not report process measures (e.g. attrition rates), and some did not use validated measures. Two-thirds of interventions were implemented at the community level and employed multiple strategies. CONCLUSION: There is a need for more rigorous evaluations of interventions targeting reductions in SNAP risk factors among Indigenous Australians, and to establish the reliability and validity of measures to quantify their effect. IMPLICATIONS: It may be beneficial for future Indigenous-specific intervention research to focus on the evaluation of secondary prevention to complement the current concentration of effort targeting primary prevention. Community-wide interventions, combining strategies of greater intensity for high risk individuals with those of less intensity targeting lower risk individuals, might also offer considerable promise.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/methods , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Smoking Cessation/ethnology , Tobacco Use Disorder/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol Drinking , Attitude of Health Personnel , Australia , Child , Child, Preschool , Culture , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Activity , Risk Factors , Smoking Cessation/methods , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL