Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Neuroeng Rehabil ; 18(1): 5, 2021 01 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33413441

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Impaired movement preparation of both anticipatory postural adjustments and goal directed movement as shown by a marked reduction in the incidence of StartReact responses during a standing reaching task was reported in individuals with stroke. We tested how transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the region of premotor areas (PMAs) and primary motor area (M1) affect movement planning and preparation of a standing reaching task in individuals with stroke. METHODS: Each subject performed two sessions of tDCS over the lesioned hemisphere on two different days: cathodal tDCS over PMAs and anodal tDCS over M1. Movement planning and preparation of anticipatory postural adjustment-reach sequence was examined by startReact responses elicited by a loud acoustic stimulus of 123 dB. Kinetic, kinematic, and electromyography data were recorded to characterize anticipatory postural adjustment-reach movement response. RESULTS: Anodal tDCS over M1 led to significant increase of startReact responses incidence at loud acoustic stimulus time point - 500 ms. Increased trunk involvement during movement execution was found after anodal M1 stimulation compared to PMAs stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide novel evidence that impairments in movement planning and preparation as measured by startReact responses for a standing reaching task can be mitigated in individuals with stroke by the application of anodal tDCS over lesioned M1 but not cathodal tDCS over PMAs. This is the first study to show that stroke-related deficits in movement planning and preparation can be improved by application of anodal tDCS over lesioned M1. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT04308629, Registered 16 March 2020-Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04308629.


Subject(s)
Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Reflex, Startle/physiology , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Stroke/physiopathology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Male , Movement , Standing Position
2.
Hum Mov Sci ; 74: 102715, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33227568

ABSTRACT

Falls contribute to injuries and reduced level of physical activity in older adults. During falls, the abrupt sensation of moving downward triggers a startle-like reaction that may interfere with protective response movements necessary to maintain balance. Startle reaction could be dampened by sensory pre-stimulation delivered immediately before a startling stimulus. This study investigated the neuromodulatory effects of pre-stimulation on postural/startle responses to drop perturbations of the standing support surface in relation to age. Ten younger and 10 older adults stood quietly on an elevated computer-controlled moveable platform. At an unpredictable time, participants were dropped vertically to elicit a startle-like response. Reactive drop perturbation trials without a pre-stimulus (control) were alternated with trials with acoustic pre-stimulus tone (PSI). A two-way mixed design analysis of variance comparing condition (control vs. PSI) X group (younger vs. older) was performed to analyze changes in muscle activation patterns, ground reaction force, and joint angular displacements. Compared to younger adults, older adults showed lower neck muscle electromyography amplitude reduction rate and incidence of response. Peak muscle activation in neck, upper arm, and hamstring muscles were reduced during PSI trials compared to control trials in both groups (p < 0.05). In addition, knee and hip joint flexion prior to ground contact was reduced in PSI trials compared to control (p < 0.05). During post-landing balance recovery, increased knee and hip flexion displacement and time to peak impact force were observed in PSI trials compared to control condition (p < 0.05). PSI reduced startle-induced muscle activation at proximal body segments and likely decreased joint flexion during abrupt downward vertical displacement perturbations of the body. Older adults retained the ability to modulate startle and postural responses but their neuromodulatory capacity was reduced compared with younger adults. Further research on the potential of applying PSI as a possible therapeutic tool to reduce the risk of fall-related injury is needed.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Aging/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Reflex, Startle/physiology , Standing Position , Adult , Aged , Arm/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Joints/physiology , Leg/physiology , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Neck Muscles/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL