Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 18(4): 1120-8, 2012 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22223528

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine the safety, efficacy, and molecular effects of sorafenib with temsirolimus in patients with advanced melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IV or unresectable or recurrent stage III melanoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 were eligible. Sorafenib was given orally once or twice daily and temsirolimus was given i.v. weekly, both starting on day 1, with a 4-week cycle. Responses were assessed every 2 cycles per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Consenting patients with accessible tumors underwent optional tumor biopsies before treatment and after the second infusion of temsirolimus. Tumor biopsies were analyzed for activating mutations in BRAF and NRAS, and for expression of P-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (P-ERK) and P-S6 proteins. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were accrued to the study. The maximum tolerated doses were sorafenib 400 mg every morning and 200 mg every evening and temsirolimus 25 mg i.v. weekly. Dose-limiting toxicities included thrombocytopenia, hand-foot syndrome, serum transaminase elevation, and hypertriglyceridemia. There were no complete or partial responses with the combination; 10 patients achieved stabilization of disease as their best response. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months. Matching pretreatment and day 15 tumor biopsies showed marked inhibition of P-S6 with treatment in 3 of 4 evaluable patients, but minimal inhibition of P-ERK. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with sorafenib and temsirolimus resulted in significant toxicity at higher dose levels, failed to achieve any clinical responses in genetically unselected patient population, and did not inhibit P-ERK.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Benzenesulfonates/administration & dosage , Benzenesulfonates/pharmacokinetics , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/mortality , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/pharmacokinetics , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Sirolimus/pharmacokinetics , Sorafenib , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 2(11): 931-41, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19892663

ABSTRACT

Epidemiologic and preclinical data support the oral cancer prevention potential of green tea extract (GTE). We randomly assigned patients with high-risk oral premalignant lesions (OPL) to receive GTE at 500, 750, or 1,000 mg/m(2) or placebo thrice daily for 12 weeks, evaluating biomarkers in baseline and 12-week biopsies. The OPL clinical response rate was higher in all GTE arms (n = 28; 50%) versus placebo (n = 11; 18.2%; P = 0.09) but did not reach statistical significance. However, the two higher-dose GTE arms [58.8% (750 and 1,000 mg/m(2)), 36.4% (500 mg/m(2)), and 18.2% (placebo); P = 0.03] had higher responses, suggesting a dose-response effect. GTE treatment also improved histology (21.4% versus 9.1%; P = 0.65), although not statistically significant. GTE was well tolerated, although higher doses increased insomnia/nervousness but produced no grade 4 toxicity. Higher mean baseline stromal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) correlated with a clinical (P = 0.04) but not histologic response. Baseline scores of other biomarkers (epithelial VEGF, p53, Ki-67, cyclin D1, and p16 promoter methylation) were not associated with a response or survival. Baseline p16 promoter methylation (n = 5) was associated with a shorter cancer-free survival. Stromal VEGF and cyclin D1 expression were downregulated in clinically responsive GTE patients and upregulated in nonresponsive patients at 12 weeks (versus at baseline). An extended (median, 27.5 months) follow-up showed a median time to oral cancer of 46.4 months. GTE may suppress OPLs, in part through reducing angiogenic stimulus (stromal VEGF). Higher doses of GTE may improve short-term (12-week) OPL outcome. The present results support longer-term clinical testing of GTE for oral cancer prevention.


Subject(s)
Mouth Neoplasms/prevention & control , Phytotherapy , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Precancerous Conditions/prevention & control , Tea , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Plant Extracts/pharmacokinetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Tissue Distribution , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/genetics , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/metabolism , Young Adult
3.
J Biol Chem ; 277(24): 21123-9, 2002 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11950832

ABSTRACT

L-Arg plays a central role in the normal function of several organ systems including the immune system. L-Arg can be depleted by arginase I produced by macrophages and hepatocytes in several disease states such as trauma and sepsis and following liver transplantation. The decrease in L-Arg levels induces a profound decrease in T cell function through mechanisms that have remained unclear. The data presented here demonstrate that Jurkat T cells cultured in medium without L-Arg (L-Arg-free RPMI) have a rapid decrease in the expression of the T cell antigen receptor zeta chain (CD3zeta), the principal signal transduction element in this receptor, and a decrease in T cell proliferation. This phenomenon is completely reversed by the replenishment of L-Arg but not other amino acids. These changes are not caused by cell apoptosis; instead, the diminished expression of CD3zeta protein is paralleled by a decrease in CD3zeta mRNA. This change in CD3zeta mRNA expression is not caused by a decrease in the transcription rate but rather by a significantly shorter CD3zeta mRNA half-life. This mechanism is sensitive to cycloheximide. Therefore, the regulation of L-Arg concentration in the microenvironment could represent an important mechanism to modulate the expression of CD3zeta and the T cell receptor and consequently of T cell function.


Subject(s)
Arginine/chemistry , CD3 Complex/chemistry , Animals , Apoptosis , Arginine/metabolism , Blotting, Northern , COS Cells , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Cycloheximide/pharmacology , DNA, Complementary/metabolism , Dactinomycin/pharmacology , Down-Regulation , Flow Cytometry , Hepatocytes/metabolism , Humans , Jurkat Cells , Macrophages/metabolism , Protein Synthesis Inhibitors/pharmacology , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/metabolism , Time Factors , Transcription, Genetic , Transfection
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL