Safety pharmacology 2023 and implementation of the ICH E14/S7B Q&A guidance document.

This editorial prefaces the annual themed issue on safety pharmacology (SP) methods published since 2004 in the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM). We highlight here the content derived from the recent 2022 Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) and Canadian Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (CSPT) joint meeting held in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The meeting also generated 179 abstracts (reproduced in the current volume of JPTM). As in previous years the manuscripts reflect various areas of innovation in SP including a comparison of the sensitivity of cross-over and parallel study designs for QTc assessment, use of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hi-PSC) neuronal cell preparations for use in neuropharmacological safety screening, and hiPSC derived cardiac myocytes in assessing inotropic adversity. With respect to the latter, we anticipate the emergence of a large data set of positive and negative controls that will test whether the imperative to miniaturize, humanize and create a high throughput process is offset by any loss of precision and accuracy.

The effect of combined ß-lactoglobulin supplementation and resistance exercise training prior to limb immobilisation on muscle protein synthesis rates in healthy young adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The decline in skeletal muscle mass experienced following a short-term period (days to weeks) of muscle disuse is mediated by impaired rates of muscle protein synthesis (MPS). Previous RCTs of exercise or nutrition prehabilitation interventions designed to mitigate disuse-induced muscle atrophy have reported limited efficacy. Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate the impact of a complex prehabilitation intervention that combines ß-lactoglobulin (a novel milk protein with a high leucine content) supplementation with resistance exercise training on disuse-induced changes in free-living integrated rates of MPS in healthy, young adults. METHODS/DESIGN: To address this aim, we will recruit 24 healthy young (18-45 years) males and females to conduct a parallel, double-blind, 2-arm, randomised placebo-controlled trial. The intervention group will combine a 7-day structured resistance exercise training programme with thrice daily dietary supplementation with 23 g of ß-lactoglobulin. The placebo group will combine the same training programme with an energy-matched carbohydrate (dextrose) control. The study protocol will last 16 days for each participant. Day 1 will be a familiarisation session and days 2-4 will be the baseline period. Days 5-11 represent the 'prehabilitation period' whereby participants will combine resistance training with their assigned dietary supplementation regimen. Days 12-16 represent the muscle disuse-induced 'immobilisation period' whereby participants will have a single leg immobilised in a brace and continue their assigned dietary supplementation regimen only (i.e. no resistance training). The primary endpoint of this study is the measurement of free-living integrated rates of MPS using deuterium oxide tracer methodology. Measurements of MPS will be calculated at baseline, over the 7-day prehabilitation period and over the 5-day immobilisation period separately. Secondary endpoints include measurements of muscle mass and strength that will be collected on days 4 (baseline), 11 (end of prehabilitation) and 16 (end of immobilisation). DISCUSSION: This novel study will establish the impact of a bimodal prehabilitation strategy that combines ß-lactoglobulin supplementation and resistance exercise training in modulating MPS following a short-term period of muscle disuse. If successful, this complex intervention may be translated to clinical practice with application to patients scheduled to undergo, for example, hip or knee replacement surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05496452. Registered on August 10, 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION: 16-12-2022/1.

Safety pharmacology in 2022: Taking one small step for cardiovascular safety assay development but one giant leap for regulatory drug safety assessment.

The 2021 Annual Safety Pharmacology (SP) Society (SPS) meeting was held virtually October 4-8, 2021 due to the continuing COVID-19 global pandemic. This themed issue of J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods comprises articles arising from the meeting. As in previous years the manuscripts reflect various areas of innovation in SP including a perspective on aging and its impact on drug attrition during safety assessments, an integrated assessment of respiratory, cardiovascular and animal activity of in vivo nonclinical studies, development of a dynamic QT-rate correction method in primates, evaluation of the "comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay" (CiPA) ion channel protocol to the automated patch clamp, and best practices regarding the conduct of hERG electrophysiology studies and an analysis of secondary pharmacology assays by the FDA. The meeting also generated 85 abstracts (reproduced in the current volume of J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods). It appears that the validation of methods remains a challenge in SP. Nevertheless, the continued efforts to mine approaches to detection of proarrhythmia liability remains a baffling obsession given the ability of Industry to completely prevent drugs entering into clinical study only to be found to have proarrhythmic properties, with no reports of such for at least ten years. Perhaps it is time to move on from CiPA and find genuine problems to solve?

Safety pharmacology methods and models in an evolving regulatory environment.

This editorial prefaces the annual themed issue on safety pharmacology (SP) methods published in the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM). We highlight here the content derived from the recent 2016 Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS), Canadian Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (CSPT), and Japanese Safety Pharmacology Society (JSPS) joint meeting held in Vancouver, B.C., Canada. This issue of JPTM continues the tradition of providing a publication summary of articles primarily presented at the joint meeting with direct bearing on the discipline of SP. As the regulatory landscape is expected to evolve with revision announced for the existing guidance document on non-clinical proarrhythmia risk assessment (ICHS7B) there is also imminent inception of the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative. Thus, the field of SP is dynamically progressing with characterization and implementation of numerous alternative non-clinical safety models. Novel method development and refinement in all areas of the discipline are reflected in the content.

Cardiac voltage-gated ion channels in safety pharmacology: Review of the landscape leading to the CiPA initiative.

Voltage gated ion channels are central in defining the fundamental properties of the ventricular cardiac action potential (AP), and are also involved in the development of drug-induced arrhythmias. Many drugs can inhibit cardiac ion currents, including the Na+ current (INa), L-type Ca2+ current (Ica-L), and K+ currents (Ito, IK1, IKs, and IKr), and thereby affect AP properties in a manner that can trigger or sustain cardiac arrhythmias. Since publication of ICH E14 and S7B over a decade ago, there has been a focus on drug effects on QT prolongation clinically, and on the rapidly activating delayed rectifier current (IKr), nonclinically, for evaluation of proarrhythmic risk. This focus on QT interval prolongation and a single ionic current likely impacted negatively some drugs that lack proarrhythmic liability in humans. To rectify this issue, the Comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) initiative has been proposed to integrate drug effects on multiple cardiac ionic currents with in silico modelling of human ventricular action potentials, and in vitro data obtained from human stem cell-derived ventricular cardiomyocytes to estimate proarrhythmic risk of new drugs with improved accuracy. In this review, we present the physiological functions and the molecular basis of major cardiac ion channels that contribute to the ventricle AP, and discuss the CiPA paradigm in drug development.

Recalibration of nonclinical safety pharmacology assessment to anticipate evolving regulatory expectations.

Safety pharmacology (SP) has evolved in terms of architecture and content since the inception of the SP Society (SPS). SP was initially focused on the issue of drug-induced QT prolongation, but has now become a broad spectrum discipline with expanding expectations for evaluation of drug adverse effect liability in all organ systems, not merely the narrow consideration of torsades de pointes (TdP) liability testing. An important part of the evolution of SP has been the elaboration of architecture for interrogation of non-clinical models in terms of model development, model validation and model implementation. While SP has been defined by mandatory cardiovascular, central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory system studies ever since the core battery was elaborated, it also involves evaluation of drug effects on other physiological systems. The current state of SP evolution is the incorporation of emerging new technologies in a wide range of non-clinical drug safety testing models. This will refine the SP process, while potentially expanding the core battery. The continued refinement of automated technologies (e.g., automated patch clamp systems) is enhancing the scope for detection of adverse effect liability (i.e., for more than just IKr blockade), while introducing a potential for speed and accuracy in cardiovascular and CNS SP by providing rapid, high throughput ion channel screening methods for implementation in early drug development. A variety of CNS liability assays, which exploit isolated brain tissue, and in vitro electrophysiological techniques, have provided an additional level of complimentary preclinical safety screens aimed at establishing the seizurogenic potential and risk for memory dysfunction of new chemical entities (NCEs). As with previous editorials that preface the annual themed issue on SP methods published in the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM), we highlight here the content derived from the most recent (2015) SPS meeting held in Prague, Czech Republic. This issue of JPTM continues the tradition of providing a publication summary of articles primarily presented at the SPS meeting with direct bearing on the discipline of SP. Novel method development and refinement in all areas of the discipline are reflected in the content.

Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey.

The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system ('CNS') drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) responded to the survey. 52% of participants were from pharmaceutical companies (>1000 employees). Oncology (67%) and neurology/psychiatry (66%) were the most frequent target indications pursued by companies followed by inflammation (48%), cardiovascular (43%), metabolic (39%), infectious (37%), orphan (32%) and respiratory (29%) diseases. Seizures (67% of participants), gait abnormalities (67%), tremors (65%), emesis (56%), sedation (52%) and salivation (47%) were the most commonly encountered CNS issues in pre-clinical drug development while headache (65%), emesis/nausea (60%), fatigue (51%) and dizziness (49%) were the most frequent issues encountered in Phase I clinical trials. 54% of respondents reported that a standard battery of tests applied to screen drug candidates was the approach most commonly used to address non-clinical CNS safety testing. A minority (14% of all participants) reported using electroencephalography (EEG) screening prior to animal inclusion on toxicology studies. The most frequent group size was n=8 for functional observation battery (FOB), polysomnography and seizure liability studies. FOB evaluations were conducted in a dedicated room (78%) by blinded personnel (66%) with control for circadian cycle (55%) effects (e.g., dosing at a standardized time; balancing time of day across treatment groups). The rat was reported as the most common species used for seizure liability, nerve conduction and drug-abuse liability testing.

Contractile function assessment by intraventricular balloon alters the ability of regional ischaemia to evoke ventricular fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In drug research using the rat Langendorff heart preparation, it is possible to study left ventricular (LV) contractility using an intraventricular balloon (IVB), and arrhythmogenesis during coronary ligation-induced regional ischaemia. Assessing both concurrently would halve animal requirements. We aimed to test the validity of this approach. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The electrocardiogram (ECG) and LV function (IVB) were recorded during regional ischaemia of different extents in a randomized and blinded study. KEY RESULTS: IVB-induced proarrhythmia was anticipated, but in hearts with an ischaemic zone (IZ) made deliberately small, an inflated IVB reduced ischaemia-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) incidence as a trend. Repeating studies in hearts with large IZs revealed the effect to be significant. There were no changes in QT interval or other variables that might explain the effect. Insertion of an IVB that was minimally inflated had no effect on any variable compared with 'no IVB' controls. The antiarrhythmic effect of verapamil (a positive control drug) was unaffected by IVB inflation. Removal of an inflated (but not a non-inflated) IVB caused a release of lactate commensurate with reperfusion of an endocardial/subendocardial layer of IVB-induced ischaemia. This was confirmed by intracellular (31) phosphorus ((31) P) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: IVB inflation does not inhibit VF suppression by a standard drug, but it has profound antiarrhythmic effects of its own, likely to be due to inflation-induced localized ischaemia. This means rhythm and contractility cannot be assessed concurrently by this approach, with implications for drug discovery and safety assessment.

The shifting landscape of safety pharmacology in 2015.

The relative importance of the discipline of safety pharmacology (which integrates physiology, pharmacologyand toxicology) has evolved since the incorporation of the Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) as an entity on August 10, 2000. Safety pharmacology (SP), as a synthesis of these other fields of knowledge, is concerned with characterizing the safety profile (or potential undesirable pharmacodynamic effects) of new chemical entities (NCEs) and biologicals. Initially focused on the issue of drug-induced QT prolongation it has developed into an important discipline over the past 15years with expertise beyond its initial focus on torsades de pointes (TdP). It has become a repository for interrogation of models for drug safety studies and innovative non-clinical model development, validation and implementation. Thus, while safety pharmacology consists of the triumvirate obligatory cardiovascular, central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory system core battery studies it also involves assessing drug effects on numerous other physiological systems (e.g., ocular, auditory, renal, gastrointestinal, blood, immune) leveraging emerging new technologies in a wide range of non-clinical drug safety testing models. As with previous editorials that preface the themed issue on safety pharmacology methods published in the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM), we highlight here the content derived from the most recent (2014) SPS meeting held in Washington, DC. The dynamics of the discipline remain fervent and method development, extension and refinement are reflected in the content. This issue of the JPTM continues the tradition of providing a publication summary of articles (reviews, commentaries and methods) with impact on the discipline of safety pharmacology.

Biophysics and Molecular Biology of Cardiac Ion Channels for the Safety Pharmacologist.

Cardiac safety pharmacology is a continuously evolving discipline that uses the basic principles of pharmacology in a regulatory-driven process to generate data to inform risk/benefit assessment of a new chemical entity (NCE). The aim of cardiac safety pharmacology is to characterise the pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic (PK/PD) relationship of a drug's adverse effects on the heart using continuously evolving methodology. Unlike Toxicology, safety pharmacology includes within its remit a regulatory requirement to predict the risk of rare cardiotoxic (potentially lethal) events such as torsades de pointes (TdP), which is statistically associated with drug-induced changes in the QT interval of the ECG due to blockade of I Kr or K v11.1 current encoded by hERG. This gives safety pharmacology its unique character. The key issues for the safety pharmacology assessment of a drug on the heart are detection of an adverse effect liability, projection of the data into safety margin calculation and clinical safety monitoring. This chapter will briefly review the current cardiac safety pharmacology paradigm outlined in the ICH S7A and ICH S7B guidance documents and the non-clinical models and methods used in the evaluation of new chemical entities in order to define the integrated risk assessment for submission to regulatory authorities. An overview of how the present cardiac paradigm was developed will be discussed, explaining how it was based upon marketing authorisation withdrawal of many non-cardiovascular compounds due to unanticipated proarrhythmic effects. The role of related biomarkers (of cardiac repolarisation, e.g. prolongation of the QT interval of the ECG) will be considered. We will also provide an overview of the 'non-hERG-centric' concepts utilised in the evolving comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CIPA) that details conduct of the proposed ion channel battery test, use of human stem cells and application of in silico models to early cardiac safety assessment. The summary of our current understanding of the triggers of TdP will include the interplay between action potential (AP) prolongation, early and delayed afterdepolarisation and substrates for re-entry arrhythmias.

Haemodynamic Assessment in Safety Pharmacology.

Evaluation of the effects of a drug on arterial blood pressure is important in nonclinical safety pharmacology assessment. Detecting large and obvious changes in blood pressure is an unchallenging task. Detecting small changes is more difficult, and interpretation of findings requires careful risk/benefit evaluation. Detecting subtle and small changes in blood pressure is important in particular with respect to increases, since blood pressure above the normal range is associated with increased risk of stroke and sudden cardiac death. Cardiovascular safety pharmacology has been preoccupied with drug-induced changes in the electrocardiogram, and by comparison, there has been little in the way of contemporaneous improvements in the level of complexity and sophistication involved in blood pressure assessment. Thus, it is important to understand the nature of drug-induced changes in blood pressure, appreciate the plethora of agents currently used clinically (and over the counter) that alter blood pressure and understand safety pharmacology study design in order to optimize assessment of a new chemical entity (NCE) or biologic agent in this context.

Safety pharmacology in 2014: new focus on non-cardiac methods and models.

"What do you know about Safety Pharmacology?" This is the question that was asked in 2000 with the inception of the Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS). There is now a widespread awareness of the role of safety pharmacology in drug discovery and increasing awareness among the wider community of methods and models used in the assessment of the core battery required set of safety studies. However, safety pharmacology does not stop with core battery studies. New methods are intensively sought in order to achieve a swifter and more reliable assessment of adverse effect liability. The dynamics of the discipline and method expansion are reflected in the content of this issue of the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM). We are into the second decade of publishing on safety pharmacology methods and models, reflected by the annual themed issue in JPTM, and on willingness of investigators to embrace new technologies and methodologies. This years' themed issue is derived from the annual Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) meeting, held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, in 2013.

Arrhythmogenic liability screening in cardiovascular safety pharmacology: commonality between non-clinical safety pharmacology and clinical thorough QT (TQT) studies.

Multiple ECG analysis strategies are used in safety pharmacology in a framework focused on accurate ECG complex interval quantification and arrhythmia detection. Automated arrhythmia detection is commonly used in the clinic and adapted tools may be used to facilitate analysis of large non-clinical datasets in safety pharmacology. The ICH E14 guideline (for Thorough QT Studies (TQT) conducted in healthy volunteers) supports manual and semi-automated ECG evaluation by skilled readers with a single operator analyzing all the ECG recordings from a given subject to minimize observer bias. Both fully automated and semi-automated ECG analysis programs may be used in safety pharmacology studies. Based on power analysis, a group size of approximately n=18 per study arm is the minimal requirement in TQT studies to provide the sensitivity to detect a 5 ms QT interval prolongation. This sample size differs markedly from common safety pharmacology non-clinical study designs. New technologies such as the jacketed external telemetry (JET) ECG system may facilitate achievement of a smaller group size in integrated cardiovascular safety pharmacology risk assessment. TQT and cardiovascular safety pharmacology studies share several common experimental and scientific limitations which may benefit from technological advances. Sensitivity expectations in non-clinical studies should be commensurate with sample size and further investigations including power analyses and comparison between fully automated and semi-automated ECG analysis may help better characterize detection thresholds. Reducing overall variability, increasing reproducibility of ECG interval measurements and enhancing arrhythmia detection strategies are the cornerstones of data analysis in cardiovascular safety pharmacology and will likely continue to attract considerable attention in the safety pharmacology community.

The continuing evolution of torsades de pointes liability testing methods: is there an end in sight?

Drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) is a syndrome that includes a potentially lethal cardiac arrhythmia. It has been identified as a possible adverse drug reaction (ADR) for drugs which affect the repolarization processes of the heart. In order to predict the potential for TdP liability, regulatory guidelines have been developed which require that new drugs be safety screened. Unfortunately, however, despite this requirement there are no validated preclinical models with TdP incidence as a hard endpoint. Therefore, surrogate biomarkers are used. The most common and eliciting the most discussion/controversy among cardiovascular scientists is the duration of the QT interval of the ECG. Since no single model is available to wholly assess drug-induced TdP liability, safety pharmacologists employ a battery of complementary preclinical models in order to develop an integrated risk assessment (IRA). Ideally, the IRA should be comprised of the results from the effects of the new chemical entity (NCE) on the human ether-a-go-go related (hERG) gene assay (actually a screen for block of the hERG gene product, the inward rectifying K current, IKr) and ECG effects in the conscious canine. However, since neither model is ideal the findings are generally supplemented by conduct of several additional experimental in vitro assays, namely the rabbit left ventricular wedge preparation, Langendorff isolated rabbit heart or isolated canine Purkinje fibre; nevertheless, as with many preclinical models, there is only limited validation and a resultant lack of general acceptance. Institution of regulatory guidance documents such as ICH S7A and S7B in conjunction with heightened awareness of the electrophysiological mechanisms that may be responsible for the development of TdP has led to a sharp fall in proarrhythmic compounds securing licensing, but at what costs? Supplementary experimental assays have furthered our understanding of drug-induced torsadogenesis, and it is now recognized that TdP is a multicausal event. This means that a perceived "positive" torsadogenic risk using one of the aforementioned models does not necessarily guarantee proarrhythmia. There has been an overall fall in the total number of NCEs pursued through development due to strict regulatory guidelines. Here we suggest that regulatory barriers can be alleviated by improving the integrated risk approach. But this requires better validation and deployment of existing preclinical models together with the invention of more precise and accurate models.

Beyond the safety assessment of drug-mediated changes in the QT interval... what's next?

Assessing drug-induced changes (particularly prolongation) in the QT interval has been the major preoccupation of safety pharmacology since its inception, under the assumption that QT widening represents a surrogate biomarker for torsades de pointes (TdeP) liability. While evidence of changes in QT remains a bane to the development of novel therapeutic agents, non-clinical and clinical methods have been developed (with a certain amount of validation) to limit this potential liability of a new chemical entity (NCE). Because of the associated withdrawal of numerous drugs from clinical use, determining whether or not a drug development candidate exhibits a TdeP liability has been the motivation in the implementation of discussions between 'pharmaceutical companies', academicians, clinicians and regulatory authorities worldwide that has led to the development of the ICHS7A and ICHS7B guidance documents (Anon, 2001, 2005). Simultaneously, it has resulted in the firm establishment of safety pharmacology as a standalone discipline within the drug development scheme (Pugsley et al., 2008). As far as TdeP liability is concerned, QT widening remains the most poignant issue, in that QT widening in humans is immediately regarded as a cause for concern, yet QT widening in preclinical models (and indeed in man) is not a quantitative predictor of TdeP liability (and indeed may not even be a qualitative predictor by itself (Pugsley et al., 2008). The present focused issue of the journal returns to safety pharmacology, and contains papers arising from the 8th annual SPS Meeting that was held in Madison, WI in 2008. Indeed, so many papers have arisen from the meeting that this issue of the Journal is only part 1. Part 2 will be published as the next issue of the Journal. Some topics which have been addressed include whether an assessment method for drugs that produce a shortened QT interval is needed, what the role of the slow component of the delayed rectifier K current (I(Ks)) should be in a safety assessment and whether safety pharmacology endpoints can or should be added to repeat dose Toxicology studies.

Methods in safety pharmacology in focus.

This focused issue of the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the fifth to highlight Methods in Safety Pharmacology and includes a number of articles from the 7th Annual Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) meeting that was held in Edinburgh, Scotland, September 19-21, 2007. However, unlike issues of the past, in which content predominantly focused on cardiovascular issues (specifically QT interval prolongation, QT-HR correction methods and validation of non-clinical cardiovascular models) this issue is composed of a number of non-cardiovascular methods papers and review articles. Of particular interest to readers will be articles related to CNS studies, in particular neurobehavioral assessments in non-human primates and the effects of drugs in juvenile and adult rats (an article that may be relevant in light of recent EU/US pediatric legislation). While cardiovascular function may not dominate there are several useful methodological papers including an assessment of cardiovascular sensitivity of drugs in conscious and anesthetized non-human primates, and a mathematical model (fractal analysis) applied to canine heartbeat dynamics. A first for the journal is a paper by Vargas et al., (2008-this issue) in which members of the SPS formed a working group in order to assess and review safety pharmacology testing of biological therapeutic agents (specifically monoclonal antibodies, mAbs). The group provides recommendations that will likely shape regulatory strategy and discussions in the yet to be fully discussed area of biological safety testing. In the tradition of obtaining a perspective on industry safety pharmacology program practices Lindgren et al., (2008-this issue) provide the results of a recent SPS survey that examines ICH S7A and S7B trends, aspects of early 'frontloading' safety studies, abuse and dependence liability and Contract Research Organization (CRO) tests/assays used in safety assessment of core battery and supplementary organ systems. In keeping with the translation track aspect of the 2007 meeting is an overview of the Distinguished Service Award lecture to Dr. T. Hammond that discusses many aspects of safety pharmacology including its evolution, impact, value and translation of non-clinical findings to humans. Finally, perspectives are presented on the use of the zebrafish as an early safety pharmacology-screening assay.

Perception of validity of clinical and preclinical methods for assessment of torsades de pointes liability.

In 2007 a meeting on drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) was held in London, UK, under the auspices of the British Society for Cardiovascular Research (BSCR). One of the objectives was to explore the validity of available biomarkers, risk factors and preclinical investigational methods for the detection of drug-induced TdP liability - preclinical methods and clinical 'thorough QT' testing. The first symposium was entitled "How validated are current models and biomarkers for testing drug-induced torsades de pointes liability?" Validation, as far as the symposium was concerned, meant that the endpoints measured in the method predict TdP liability specifically, selectively and quantitatively. Topics (and the publications derived from the presentations) were: human volunteer phase 1 studies [Vik, T., Pollard, C., & Sager, P. (2008-this issue), the anaesthetized rabbit TDP model [Carlsson, L. (2008-this issue), the AV blocked canine preparation [Oros, A., Beekman, J. D. M., & Vos, M. A. (2008-this issue), QT interval and its corrections in the in vivo conscious canine [Fossa, A. A. (2008-this issue), the rabbit heart failure model [Hamlin, R. L., & Kijtawornrat, A. (2008-this issue), the rabbit Langendorff preparation and the Screenit approach [Dumotier, B. M., Deurinck, M., Yang, Y., Traebert, M., & Suter, W. (2008-this issue), the wedge preparation [Yan G.-X. (2008-this issue)] and hERG screens [Hancox, J. C., McPate, M. J., El Harchi, A., & Zhang, Y. h. (2008-this issue). Unbeknownst to the speakers before the start of the sessions, the audience were invited, during the session, to rate each approach on a 0 to 10 scale in terms of the extent to which each approach appeared to be validated. The outcome of this exercise forms the basis of this article. We invite you to evaluate for yourselves the accompanying reviews in this edition of Pharmacology and Therapeutics.