Optimization of Evidence-Based Heart Failure Medications After an Acute Heart Failure Admission: A Secondary Analysis of the STRONG-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Testing of Heart Failure Therapies (STRONG-HF) trial strived for rapid uptitration aiming to reach 100% optimal doses of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) within 2 weeks after discharge from an acute heart failure (AHF) admission. Objective: To assess the association between degree of GDMT doses achieved in high-intensity care and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a post hoc secondary analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial, conducted from May 2018 to September 2022. Included in the study were patients with AHF who were not treated with optimal doses of GDMT before and after discharge from an AHF admission. Data were analyzed from January to October 2023. Interventions: The mean percentage of the doses of 3 classes of HF medications (renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, ß-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) relative to their optimal doses was computed. Patients were classified into 3 dose categories: low (<50%), medium (≥50% to <90%), and high (≥90%). Dose and dose group were included as a time-dependent covariate in Cox regression models, which were used to test whether outcomes differed by dose. Main Outcome Measures: Post hoc secondary analyses of postdischarge 180-day HF readmission or death and 90-day change in quality of life. Results: A total of 515 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [13.4] years; 311 male [60.4%]) assigned high-intensity care were included in this analysis. At 2 weeks, 39 patients (7.6%) achieved low doses, 254 patients (49.3%) achieved medium doses, and 222 patients (43.1%) achieved high doses. Patients with lower blood pressure and more congestion were less likely to be uptitrated to optimal GDMT doses at week 2. As a continuous time-dependent covariate, an increase of 10% in the average percentage optimal dose was associated with a reduction in 180-day HF readmission or all-cause death (primary end point: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98; P = .01) and a decrease in 180-day all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95; P = .007). Quality of life at 90 days, measured by the EQ-5D visual analog scale, improved more in patients treated with higher doses of GDMT (mean difference, 0.10; 95% CI, -4.88 to 5.07 and 3.13; 95% CI, -1.98 to 8.24 points in the medium- and high-dose groups relative to the low-dose group, respectively; P = .07). Adverse events to day 90 occurred less frequently in participants with HIC who were prescribed higher GDMT doses at week 2. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this post hoc analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial show that, among patients randomly assigned to high-intensity care, achieving higher doses of HF GDMT 2 weeks after discharge was feasible and safe in most patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03412201.

Effect of 3, 2-Drug Combinations of Antihypertensive Therapies on Blood Pressure Variability in Black African Patients: Secondary Analyses of the CREOLE Trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of 3 commonly recommended combinations of anti-hypertensive agents-amlodipine plus hydrochlorothiazide (calcium channel blocker [CCB]+thiazide), amlodipine plus perindopril (CCB+ACE [angiotensin-converting enzyme]-inhibitor), and perindopril plus hydrochlorothiazide (ACE-inhibitor+thiazide) on blood pressure variability (V) are unknown. METHODS: We calculated the blood pressure variability (BPV) in 405 patients (130, 146, and 129 randomized to ACE-inhibitor+thiazide, CCB+thiazide, and CCB+ACE-inhibitor, respectively) who underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after 6 months of treatment in the Comparisons of Three Combinations Therapies in Lowering Blood Pressure in Black Africans trial (CREOLE) of Black African patients. BPV was calculated using the SD of 30-minute interval values for 24-hour ambulatory BPs and for confirmation using the coefficient of variation. Linear mixed model regression was used to calculate mean differences in BPV between treatment arms. Within-clinic BPV was also calculated from the mean SD and coefficient of variation of 3 readings at clinic visits. RESULTS: Baseline distributions of age, sex, and blood pressure parameters were similar across treatment groups. Participants were predominately male (62.2%) with mean age 50.4 years. Those taking CCB+thiazide had significantly reduced ambulatory systolic and diastolic BPV compared with those taking ACE-inhibitor+thiazide. The CCB+thiazide and CCB+ACE-inhibitor groups showed similar BPV. Similar patterns of BPV were apparent among groups using within-clinic blood pressures and when assessed by coefficient of variation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CCB-containing combinations, ACE-inhibitor plus thiazide was associated with higher levels, generally significant, of ambulatory and within-clinic systolic and diastolic BPV. These results supplement the differential ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of these therapies in the CREOLE trial.

The INVICTUS rheumatic heart disease research program: Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of a randomized trial of rivaroxaban compared to vitamin K antagonists in rheumatic valvular disease and atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a neglected disease affecting 33 million people, mainly in low and middle income countries. Yet very few large trials or registries have been conducted in this population. The INVICTUS program of research in RHD consists of a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) of 4500 patients comparing rivaroxaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with RHD and atrial fibrillation (AF), a registry of 17,000 patients to document the contemporary clinical course of patients with RHD, including a focused sub-study on pregnant women with RHD within the registry. This paper describes the rationale, design, organization and baseline characteristics of the RCT and a summary of the design of the registry and its sub-study. Patients with RHD and AF are considered to be at high risk of embolic strokes, and oral anticoagulation with VKAs is recommended for stroke prevention. But the quality of anticoagulation with VKA is poor in developing countries. A drug which does not require monitoring, and which is safe and effective for preventing stroke in patients with valvular AF, would fulfill a major unmet need. METHODS: The INVestIgation of rheumatiC AF Treatment Using VKAs, rivaroxaban or aspirin Studies (INVICTUS-VKA) trial is an international, multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel group trial, testing whether rivaroxaban 20 mg given once daily is non-inferior (or superior) to VKA in patients with RHD, AF, and an elevated risk of stroke (mitral stenosis with valve area ≤2 cm2, left atrial spontaneous echo-contrast or thrombus, or a CHA2DS2VASc score ≥2). The primary efficacy outcome is a composite of stroke or systemic embolism and the primary safety outcome is the occurrence of major bleeding. The trial has enrolled 4565 patients from 138 sites in 23 countries from Africa, Asia and South America. The Registry plans to enroll an additional 17,000 patients with RHD and document their treatments, and their clinical course for at least 2 years. The pregnancy sub-study will document the clinical course of pregnant women with RHD. CONCLUSION: INVICTUS is the largest program of clinical research focused on a neglected cardiovascular disease and will provide new information on the clinical course of patients with RHD, and approaches to anticoagulation in those with concomitant AF.

Seven key actions to eradicate rheumatic heart disease in Africa: the Addis Ababa communiqué.

Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remain major causes of heart failure, stroke and death among African women and children, despite being preventable and imminently treatable. From 21 to 22 February 2015, the Social Cluster of the Africa Union Commission (AUC) hosted a consultation with RHD experts convened by the Pan-African Society of Cardiology (PASCAR) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, to develop a 'roadmap' of key actions that need to be taken by governments to eliminate ARF and eradicate RHD in Africa. Seven priority areas for action were adopted: (1) create prospective disease registers at sentinel sites in affected countries to measure disease burden and track progress towards the reduction of mortality by 25% by the year 2025, (2) ensure an adequate supply of high-quality benzathine penicillin for the primary and secondary prevention of ARF/RHD, (3) improve access to reproductive health services for women with RHD and other non-communicable diseases (NCD), (4) decentralise technical expertise and technology for diagnosing and managing ARF and RHD (including ultrasound of the heart), (5) establish national and regional centres of excellence for essential cardiac surgery for the treatment of affected patients and training of cardiovascular practitioners of the future, (6) initiate national multi-sectoral RHD programmes within NCD control programmes of affected countries, and (7) foster international partnerships with multinational organisations for resource mobilisation, monitoring and evaluation of the programme to end RHD in Africa. This Addis Ababa communiqué has since been endorsed by African Union heads of state, and plans are underway to implement the roadmap in order to end ARF and RHD in Africa in our lifetime.

Low prevalence of hypertension with pharmacological treatments and associated factors.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the determinants of the lack of pharmacological treatment for hypertension. METHODS: In 2005, 3,323 Mozambicans aged 25-64 years old were evaluated. Blood pressure, weight, height and smoking status were assessed following the Stepwise Approach to Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance. Hypertensives (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg and/or antihypertensive drug therapy) were evaluated for awareness of their condition, pharmacological and non-pharmacological management, as well as use of herbal or traditional remedies. Prevalence ratios (PR) were calculated, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors and non-pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: Most of the hypertensive subjects (92.3%), and nearly half of those aware of their condition were not treated pharmacologically. Among the aware, the prevalence of untreated hypertension was higher in men {PR = 1.61; 95% confidence interval (95%CI 1.10;2.36)} and was lower in subjects under non-pharmacological treatment (PR = 0.58; 95%CI 0.42;0.79); there was no significant association with traditional treatments (PR = 0.75; 95%CI 0.44;1.26). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of pharmacological treatment for hypertension was more frequent in men, and was not influenced by the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors; it could not be explained by the use of alternative treatments as herbal/traditional medicines or non-pharmacological management. It is important to understand the reasons behind the lack of management of diagnosed hypertension and to implement appropriate corrective actions to reduce the gap in the access to healthcare between developed and developing countries.

Low prevalence of hypertension with pharmacological treatments and associated factors / Baixa prevalencia de hipertensao com tratamento farmacologico e fatores associados / Baja prevalencia de hipertension con tratamiento farmacologico y factores asociados

OBJECTIVE: To assess the determinants of the lack of pharmacological treatment for hypertension. METHODS: In 2005, 3,323 Mozambicans aged 25-64 years old were evaluated. Blood pressure, weight, height and smoking status were assessed following the Stepwise Approach to Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance. Hypertensives (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg and/or antihypertensive drug therapy) were evaluated for awareness of their condition, pharmacological and non-pharmacological management, as well as use of herbal or traditional remedies. Prevalence ratios (PR) were calculated, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors and non-pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: Most of the hypertensive subjects (92.3%), and nearly half of those aware of their condition were not treated pharmacologically. Among the aware, the prevalence of untreated hypertension was higher in men {PR = 1.61; 95% confidence interval (95%CI 1.10;2.36)} and was lower in subjects under non-pharmacological treatment (PR = 0.58; 95%CI 0.42;0.79); there was no significant association with traditional treatments (PR = 0.75; 95%CI 0.44;1.26). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of pharmacological treatment for hypertension was more frequent in men, and was not influenced by the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors; it could not be explained by the use of alternative treatments as herbal/traditional medicines or non-pharmacological management. It is important to understand the reasons behind the lack of management of diagnosed hypertension and to implement appropriate corrective actions to reduce the gap in the access to healthcare between developed and developing countries. .

OBJETIVO: Analisar os determinantes da falta de tratamento farmacológico da hipertensão. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 3.323 moçambicanos de 25 a 64 anos em 2005. A pressão arterial, peso, altura e tabagismo foram avaliados segundo o estudo Stepwise Approach to Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance . Os hipertensos (pressão arterial sistólica ≥ 140 mmHg e/ou pressão arterial diastólica ≥ 90 mmHg e/ou terapia anti-hipertensiva) foram avaliados para verificar se eram conscientes de sua hipertensão, se recebiam tratamento farmacológico ou não farmacológico e se usavam ervas ou remédios tradicionais. Foram calculadas as razões de prevalência (PR) para hipertensão não tratada, ajustadas para características sociodemográficas, fatores de risco cardiovascular e tratamento não farmacológico. RESULTADOS: A maioria dos hipertensos (92,3%) e quase metade dos conscientes de sua hipertensão não eram tratados com fármacos. Entre os que sabiam ser hipertensos, a hipertensão sem tratamento era mais frequente em homens (PR = 1,61; IC95% 0,56;1,43) e não podia ser explicada pelo uso de tratamento não farmacológico (PR = 0,58; IC95% 0,42;0,79); não havia associação significativa com os tratamentos tradicionais (PR = 0,75; IC95% 0,44;1,26). CONCLUSÕES: A falta de tratamento farmacológico da hipertensão, mais frequente em homens, não se explica por outros fatores de risco cardiovascular, nem pelo uso de tratamentos tradicionais ou tratamento não farmacológico. É importante entender as razões da falta de tratamento da hipertensão diagnosticada e implementar medidas corretivas apropriadas, para reduzir as diferenças ...

OBJETIVO: Analizar los determinantes de la falta de tratamiento farmacológico de la hipertensión. METODOS: Se evaluaron 3.323 mozambicano de 25 a 64 años en 2005. La presión arterial, peso, altura y tabaquismo fueron evaluados según el estudio Stepwise Approach to Chronic Risk Factor Surveillance. Los hipertensos (presión arterial sistólica ≥ 140 mmHg y/o presión arterial diastólica 90 mmHg y/o terapia anti-hipertensiva) fueron evaluados para verificar si eran conscientes de su hipertensión, si recibían tratamiento farmacológico o no farmacológico, y si usaban hierbas o remedios tradicionales. Se calcularon los cocientes de prevalencia (PR) para hipertensión no tratada, ajustadas para características sociodemográficas, factores de riesgo cardiovascular y tratamiento no farmacológico. RESULTADOS: La mayoría de los hipertensos (92,3%) y casi la mitad de los conscientes de su hipertensión no eran tratadas con fármacos. Entre los que sabían ser hipertensos, la hipertensión sin tratamiento era más frecuente en hombres (PR =1,61; IC95% 0,56;1,43) y no podía ser explicada por el uso de tratamiento no farmacológico (PR= 0,58; IC95% 0,42;0,79); no había asociación significativa con los tratamientos tradicionales (PR= 0,75; IC95% 0,44;1,26). CONCLUSIONES: La falta de tratamiento farmacológico de la hipertensión, más frecuente en hombres, no se explica por otros factores de riesgo cardiovascular, ni por el uso de tratamientos tradicionales o tratamiento no farmacológico. Es importante entender las razones de la falta de tratamiento de la hipertensión diagnosticada e implementar medidas correctivas apropiadas, para reducir las diferencias en el acceso a ...