Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Endocrinol ; 197(3): 503-15, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18492816

ABSTRACT

The phytoestrogens genistein, daidzein and the daidzein metabolite equol have been shown previously to possess oestrogen agonist activity. However, following consumption of soya diets, they are found in the body not only as aglycones but also as metabolites conjugated at their 4'- and 7-hydroxyl groups with sulphate. This paper describes the effects of monosulphation on the oestrogen agonist properties of these three phytoestrogens in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in terms of their relative ability to compete with [(3)H]oestradiol for binding to oestrogen receptor (ER), to induce a stably transfected oestrogen-responsive reporter gene (ERE-CAT) and to stimulate cell growth. In no case did sulphation abolish activity. The 4'-sulphation of genistein reduced oestrogen agonist activity to a small extent in whole-cell assays but increased the relative binding affinity to ER. The 7-sulphation of genistein, and also of equol, reduced oestrogen agonist activity substantially in all assays. By contrast, the position of monosulphation of daidzein acted in an opposing manner on oestrogen agonist activity. Sulphation at the 4'-position of daidzein resulted in a modest reduction in oestrogen agonist activity but sulphation of daidzein at the 7-position resulted in an increase in oestrogen agonist activity. Molecular modelling and docking studies suggested that the inverse effects of sulphation could be explained by the binding of daidzein into the ligand-binding domain of the ER in the opposite orientation compared with genistein and equol. This is the first report of sulphation enhancing activity of an isoflavone and inverse effects of sulphation between individual phytoestrogens.


Subject(s)
Genistein/pharmacology , Isoflavones/pharmacology , Phytoestrogens/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Equol , Estradiol/metabolism , Estradiol/pharmacology , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Female , Genistein/metabolism , Humans , Isoflavones/metabolism , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism , Structure-Activity Relationship , Sulfates/metabolism
2.
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 20(1): 121-43, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16522524

ABSTRACT

The established role of oestrogen in the development and progression of breast cancer raises questions concerning a potential contribution from the many chemicals in the environment which can enter the human breast and which have oestrogenic activity. A range of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls possess oestrogen-mimicking properties and have been measured in human breast adipose tissue and in human milk. These enter the breast from varied environmental contamination of food, water and air, and due to their lipophilic properties can accumulate in breast fat. However, it is emerging that the breast is also exposed to a range of oestrogenic chemicals applied as cosmetics to the underarm and breast area. These cosmetics are left on the skin in the appropriate area, allowing a more direct dermal absorption route for breast exposure to oestrogenic chemicals and allowing absorbed chemicals to escape systemic metabolism. This review considers evidence in support of a functional role for the combined interactions of cosmetic chemicals with environmental oestrogens, pharmacological oestrogens, phyto-oestrogens and physiological oestrogens in the rising incidence of breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Environmental Pollutants/toxicity , Estrogens/adverse effects , Aluminum Compounds/adverse effects , Aluminum Compounds/toxicity , Animals , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cosmetics/toxicity , Estrogens/toxicity , Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/toxicity , Female , Fibrocystic Breast Disease/chemically induced , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Parabens/adverse effects , Parabens/toxicity , Phthalic Acids/adverse effects , Phthalic Acids/toxicity , Phytoestrogens/adverse effects , Phytoestrogens/toxicity , Radiation-Protective Agents/adverse effects , Radiation-Protective Agents/toxicity , Siloxanes/adverse effects , Siloxanes/toxicity , Skin Absorption , Triclosan/adverse effects , Triclosan/toxicity , Ultraviolet Rays
3.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol ; 94(5): 431-43, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15876408

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have compared the oestrogenic properties of phytoestrogens in a wide variety of disparate assays. Since not all phytoestrogens have been tested in each assay, this makes inter-study comparisons and ranking oestrogenic potency difficult. In this report, we have compared the oestrogen agonist and antagonist activity of eight phytoestrogens (genistein, daidzein, equol, miroestrol, deoxymiroestrol, 8-prenylnaringenin, coumestrol and resveratrol) in a range of assays all based within the same receptor and cellular context of the MCF7 human breast cancer cell line. The relative binding of each phytoestrogen to oestrogen receptor (ER) of MCF7 cytosol was calculated from the molar excess needed for 50% inhibition of 3H]oestradiol binding (IC50), and was in the order coumestrol (35x)/8-prenylnaringenin (45x)/deoxymiroestrol (50x)>miroestrol (260x)>genistein (1000x)>equol (4000x)>daidzein (not achieved: 40% inhibition at 10(4)-fold molar excess)>resveratrol (not achieved: 10% inhibition at 10(5)-fold molar excess). For cell-based assays, the rank order of potency (estimated in terms of the concentration needed to achieve a response equivalent to 50% of that found with 17beta-oestradiol (IC50)) remained very similar for all the assays whether measuring ligand ability to induce a stably transfected oestrogen-responsive ERE-CAT reporter gene, cell growth in terms of proliferation rate after 7 days or cell growth in terms of saturation density after 14 days. The IC50 values for these three assays in order were for 17beta-oestradiol (1 x 10(-11)M, 1 x 10(-11)M, 2 x 10(-11)M), and in rank order of potency for the phytoestrogens, deoxymiroestrol (1 x 10(-10)M, 3 x 10(-11)M, 2 x 10(-11)M)>miroestrol (3 x 10(-10)M, 2 x 10(-10)M, 8 x 10(-11)M)>8-prenylnaringenin (1 x 10(-9)M, 3 x 10(-10)M, 3 x 10(-10)M)>coumestrol (3 x 10(-8)M, 2 x 10(-8)M, 3 x 10(-8)M)>genistein (4 x 10(-8)M, 2 x 10(-8)M, 1 x 10(-8)M)/equol (1 x 10(-7)M, 3 x 10(-8)M, 2 x 10(-8)M)>daidzein (3 x 10(-7)M, 2 x 10(-7)M, 4 x 10(-8)M)>resveratrol (4 x 10(-6)M, not achieved, not achieved). Despite using the same receptor context of the MCF7 cells, this rank order differed from that determined from receptor binding. The most marked difference was for coumestrol and 8-prenylnaringenin which both displayed a relatively potent ability to displace [3H]oestradiol from cytosolic ER compared with their much lower activity in the cell-based assays. Albeit at varying concentrations, seven of the eight phytoestrogens (all except resveratrol) gave similar maximal responses to that given by 17beta-oestradiol in cell-based assays which makes them full oestrogen agonists. We found no evidence for any oestrogen antagonist action of any of these phytoestrogens at concentrations of up to 10(-6)M on either reporter gene induction or on stimulation of cell growth.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor Modulators/pharmacology , Phytoestrogens/pharmacology , Receptors, Estrogen/agonists , Receptors, Estrogen/antagonists & inhibitors , Biological Assay , Cell Proliferation , Estrogen Antagonists/pharmacology , Female , Gene Expression/drug effects , Genes, Reporter , Humans , Ligands , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/pharmacology , Tumor Cells, Cultured
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL