Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 59(5): 599-604, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33750579

ABSTRACT

Chronic pain and functional impairment associated with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders (TMD) considerably reduce oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). In the present study we have assessed the influence of prolotherapy in patients with TMD by the subjective measurement of QoL using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Twenty-five patients diagnosed with TMD (mean (range) age 38 (18 - 70) years) were included. They had all undergone dextrose prolotherapy to the TMJ at regular time intervals (four times at intervals of two weeks) using the method suggested by Hemwall-Hackett. They were asked to answer the OHIP-14 questionnaire before and two years after prolotherapy. Seven domains of OHRQoL were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Domain scores and total OHIP-14 scores were compared using inferential statistics (chi squared and Wilcoxon signed rank tests). Prolotherapy was effective over time, as all the domains' mean scores decreased considerably after treatment. The total mean score before prolotherapy was 21.20, which was extensively reduced to 13.08 after prolotherapy (p=0.001). There was statistically significant improvement in all domains, including functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap (p≤0.005 in all cases). We concluded that prolotherapy has a promising role in the improvement of OHRQoL of patients with TMD, and its beneficial effects persist at least two years after treatment.


Subject(s)
Prolotherapy , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Adult , Humans , Oral Health , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/drug therapy
2.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 57(9): 857-860, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563483

ABSTRACT

Lignocaine is one of the most commonly-used agents to anaesthetise an area preoperatively. It can, however, cause undesirable effects such as burning on injection, relatively slow onset, and unreliable, or lack of, numbness when injected into infected tissues as a result of the acidic pH of commercial preparations (the pH is between 3.5 and 7.0 compared with the physiological pH, which is between 7.35 and 7.45). The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the efficacy of buffered local anaesthetic on infected areas by altering the pH with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate, to measure the pain before and after the injection, and to record the time of onset of anaesthesia. All 60 patients were given 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline 1:80,000 and 30 patients were randomly allocated to have 10:1 dilution of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (study group). Pain was assessed on a visual analogue scale and a verbal rating scale. There was a significant difference in the amount of pain between control and study groups (p=0.025). The mean (SD) time (minutes) to onset of local anaesthesia in the study group was 1.06 (0.25) compared with 2.96 (0.81) in the control group (p<0.001). Our results confirm the efficacy of the buffered local anaesthetic solution in reducing pain on injection and resulting in quicker onset of anaesthesia. Increasing the pH of lignocaine solutions with bicarbonate immediately before use, therefore, should be considered when treating various acute infections of the head and neck.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Bicarbonates/administration & dosage , Lidocaine , Anesthesia, Local/adverse effects , Buffers , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Male , Pain/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL