Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Brain Stimul ; 15(5): 1077-1087, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35952963

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The exact architecture of the human auditory cortex remains a subject of debate, with discrepancies between functional and microstructural studies. In a hierarchical framework for sensory perception, simple sound perception is expected to take place in the primary auditory cortex, while the processing of complex, or more integrated perceptions is proposed to rely on associative and higher-order cortices. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesize that auditory symptoms induced by direct electrical stimulation (DES) offer a window into the architecture of the brain networks involved in auditory hallucinations and illusions. The intracranial recordings of these evoked perceptions of varying levels of integration provide the evidence to discuss the theoretical model. METHODS: We analyzed SEEG recordings from 50 epileptic patients presenting auditory symptoms induced by DES. First, using the Juelich cytoarchitectonic parcellation, we quantified which regions induced auditory symptoms when stimulated (ROI approach). Then, for each evoked auditory symptom type (illusion or hallucination), we mapped the cortical networks showing concurrent high-frequency activity modulation (HFA approach). RESULTS: Although on average, illusions were found more laterally and hallucinations more posteromedially in the temporal lobe, both perceptions were elicited in all levels of the sensory hierarchy, with mixed responses found in the overlap. The spatial range was larger for illusions, both in the ROI and HFA approaches. The limbic system was specific to the hallucinations network, and the inferior parietal lobule was specific to the illusions network. DISCUSSION: Our results confirm a network-based organization underlying conscious sound perception, for both simple and complex components. While symptom localization is interesting from an epilepsy semiology perspective, the hallucination-specific modulation of the limbic system is particularly relevant to tinnitus and schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex , Epilepsy , Illusions , Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Brain Mapping , Electric Stimulation , Electroencephalography , Hallucinations/etiology , Humans , Illusions/physiology
2.
Brain Stimul ; 6(3): 241-7, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22727526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Responsive deep brain stimulation (rDBS) has been recently proposed to block epileptic seizures at onset. Yet, long-term stability of brain responses to such kind of stimulation is not known. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the neural adaptation to repeated rDBS as measured by the changes of anti-epileptic efficacy of bilateral DBS of the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) versus auditory stimulation, in a rat model of spontaneous recurrent absence seizures (GAERS). METHODS: Local field potentials (LFP) were recorded in freely moving animals during 1 h up to 24 h under automated responsive stimulations (SNr-DBS and auditory). Comparison of seizure features was used to characterise transient (repetition-suppression effect) and long-lasting (stability of anti-epileptic efficacy, i.e. ratio of successfully interrupted seizures) effects of responsive stimulations. RESULTS: SNr-DBS was more efficient than auditory stimulation in blocking seizures (97% vs. 52% of seizures interrupted, respectively). Sensitivity to minimal interstimulus interval was much stronger for SNr-DBS than for auditory stimulation. Anti-epileptic efficacy of SNr-DBS was remarkably stable during long-term (24 h) recordings. CONCLUSIONS: In the GAERS model, we demonstrated the superiority of SNr-DBS to suppress seizures, as compared to auditory stimulation. Importantly, we found no long-term habituation to rDBS. However, when seizure recurrence was frequent, rDBS lack anti-epileptic efficacy because responsive stimulations became too close (time interval < 40 s) suggesting the existence of a refractory period. This study thus motivates the use of automated rDBS in patients having transient seizures separated by sufficiently long intervals.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Epilepsy, Absence/physiopathology , Epilepsy, Absence/therapy , Substantia Nigra/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Disease Models, Animal , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy, Absence/genetics , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Male , Rats , Time Factors
3.
J Neurosci ; 31(7): 2712-7, 2011 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21325540

ABSTRACT

Subcortical-cortical interactions in the language network were investigated using dynamic causal modeling of magnetoencephalographic data recorded during auditory comprehension. Participants heard sentences that either were correct or contained violations. Sentences containing violations had syntactic or prosodic violations or both. We show that a hidden source, modeling magnetically silent deep nuclei, is required to explain the data best. This is in line with recent brain imaging studies and intracranial recordings suggesting an involvement of subcortical structures in language processing. Here, the processing of syntactic and prosodic violations elicited a global increase in the amplitude of evoked responses, both at the cortical and subcortical levels. As estimated by Bayesian model averaging, this was accompanied by various changes in cortical-cortical and subcortical-cortical connectivity. The most consistent findings in relation to violations were a decrease of reentrant inputs to Heschl's gyrus (HG) and of transcallosal lateral connections. These results suggest that in conditions where one hemisphere detects a violation, possibly via fast thalamocortical (HG) loops, the intercallosal connectivity is reduced to allow independent processing of syntax (left hemisphere) and of prosody (right hemisphere). This study is the first demonstration in cognitive neuroscience that subcortical-cortical loops can be empirically investigated using noninvasive electrophysiological recordings.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Brain/physiology , Comprehension , Language , Nonlinear Dynamics , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Bayes Theorem , Electroencephalography/methods , Evoked Potentials , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetoencephalography/methods , Male , Monte Carlo Method , Neural Pathways/physiology , Young Adult
4.
Neurosurgery ; 68(2): 482-90; discussion 490, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21135746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cortical stimulation is under investigation in clinical trials of drug-resistant epilepsy. Results are heterogeneous; therefore, more evidence from animal studies is required. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic effects of parameters of direct stimulation of the cortical focus in a Macaca fascicularis presenting focal motor epilepsy. METHODS: We developed a model of motor seizures after intracortical injection of penicillin G in the primary motor cortex of a Macaca fascicularis. We performed electric epidural cortical stimulation at low, medium, and high frequency using continuous or short-term stimulation. Short-term stimulation was triggered on seizure onset, either visually or automatically with a seizure detection algorithm connected to a programmable stimulator. RESULTS: Automated detection could detect 100% of the seizures, but ensuing cortical electric stimulation failed to abort seizures. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the inefficacy of the stimulation of the cortical focus to prevent seizures induced by local injection of penicillin G. Because this model may be too severe to allow comparison to human epilepsies, further work is required in other monkey models of focal epilepsy.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Epilepsy, Partial, Motor/therapy , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Seizures/therapy , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Epilepsy, Partial, Motor/physiopathology , Macaca fascicularis , Seizures/physiopathology
5.
Epileptic Disord ; 11(2): 100-12, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19473948

ABSTRACT

Neurostimulation represents an interesting alternative therapy for patients resistant to drug treatment or who cannot benefit from resective surgery. Theoretically, neurostimulation allows the control of seizures to be tailored to the individual patient and specific form of epilepsy. Here, we review both experimental and clinical studies that have reported the possible control of epileptic seizures by means of different approaches using electrical stimulation (vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation). The rationale for targeting specific areas that have thus far been considered (i.e., vagus nerve, cerebellum, anterior or centromedial thalamus, basal ganglia, cortex and temporal lobe) is addressed in the light of experimental data and clinical effectiveness in different models and forms of epilepsy. The type of seizures that can be considered for neurostimulation, as well as the optimal parameters such as stimulation frequency and modes of stimulation (chronic, continuous or adaptative), are discussed to determine the best candidates for such a therapeutic strategy. This review points out the need for improved knowledge of neural circuits that generate seizures and/or allow their propagation, as well as a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of neurostimulation.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Brain/surgery , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Epilepsy/therapy , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/methods , Animals , Basal Ganglia/physiopathology , Basal Ganglia/surgery , Cerebellum/physiopathology , Cerebellum/surgery , Epilepsy/physiopathology , Humans , Thalamus/physiopathology , Thalamus/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL