ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 event-related potentials (ERPs) have been studied in relation to phoneme discrimination and categorization, respectively. Although the effects of aging and sex on pure-tone perception have been widely investigated using these ERPs, evidence relating to phoneme perception is scarce. The current study aimed to provide insight into the effects of aging and sex on phoneme discrimination and categorization, as measured through the MMN and P300. METHOD: An inattentive and attentive oddball paradigm containing a phonemic articulation place contrast were administered during EEG registration in sixty healthy individuals (thirty males and females), of which an equal number of young (20-39 years), middle-aged (40-59 years) and elderly (60+ years) subjects were included. The amplitude, onset latency and topographical distribution of the MMN and P300 effect, as well as the amplitude of the P1-N1-P2 complex, were analyzed for age group and sex differences. RESULTS: With respect to aging, elderly subjects demonstrated a reduced MMN and P300 amplitude compared to the young group, whereas the scalp distribution of both components was unaffected. No aging effects on the P1-N1-P2 complex were found. In elderly individuals, the P300 was found to be delayed compared to the young group, while no such effect on MMN latency could be observed. No differences in MMN and P300 measures could be identified between males and females. CONCLUSION: Differential effects of aging were found on the MMN and P300, specifically in terms of latency, in relation to phoneme perception. In contrast, sex was found to scarcely affect both processes.
Subject(s)
Aging , Evoked Potentials , Middle Aged , Aged , Humans , Male , Female , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Aging/physiology , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Cognition , Perception , Electroencephalography/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Auditory Perception/physiologyABSTRACT
There is accumulating evidence for auditory dysfunctions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Moreover, a possible relationship has been suggested between altered auditory intensity processing and the hypophonic speech characteristics in PD. Nonetheless, further insight into the neurophysiological correlates of auditory intensity processing in patients with PD is needed primarily. In the present study, high-density EEG recordings were used to investigate intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials (IDAEPs) in 14 patients with PD and 14 age- and gender-matched healthy control participants (HCs). Patients with PD were evaluated in both the on- and off-medication states. HCs were also evaluated twice. Significantly increased IDAEP of the N1/P2 was demonstrated in patients with PD evaluated in the on-medication state compared to HCs. Distinctive results were found for the N1 and P2 component. Regarding the N1 component, no differences in latency or amplitude were shown between patients with PD and HCs regardless of the medication state. In contrast, increased P2 amplitude was demonstrated in patients with PD evaluated in the on-medication state compared to the off-medication state and HCs. In addition to a dopaminergic deficiency, deficits in serotonergic neurotransmission in PD were shown based on increased IDAEP. Due to specific alterations of the N1-P2 complex, the current results suggest deficiencies in early-attentive inhibitory processing of auditory input in PD. This interpretation is consistent with the involvement of the basal ganglia and the role of dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotransmission in auditory gating.
Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex , Parkinson Disease , Acoustic Stimulation , Attention , Auditory Perception , Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Synaptic TransmissionABSTRACT
Motor speech requires numerous neural computations including feedforward and feedback control mechanisms. A reduction of auditory or somatosensory feedback may be implicated in disorders of speech, as predicted by various models of speech control. In this paper the effects of reduced somatosensory feedback on articulation and intelligibility of individual phonemes was evaluated by using topical anesthesia of orobuccal structures in 24 healthy subjects. The evaluation was done using a combination of perceptual intelligibility estimation of consonants and vowels and acoustic analysis of motor speech. A significantly reduced intelligibility was found, with a major impact on consonant formation. Acoustic analysis demonstrated disturbed diadochokinesis. These results underscore the clinical importance of somatosensory feedback in speech control. The interpretation of these findings in the context of speech control models, neuro-anatomy and clinical neurology may have implications for subtyping of dysarthria.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthetics/adverse effects , Biofeedback, Psychology/drug effects , Phonetics , Speech Intelligibility/drug effects , Administration, Buccal , Adult , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthetics/administration & dosage , Cognition , Dysarthria/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Male , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Speech/drug effects , Speech Production MeasurementABSTRACT
Auditory phoneme discrimination (APD) is supported by both auditory and motor regions through a sensorimotor interface embedded in a fronto-temporo-parietal cortical network. However, the specific spatiotemporal organization of this network during APD with respect to different types of phonemic contrasts is still unclear. Here, we use source reconstruction, applied to event-related potentials in a group of 47 participants, to uncover a potential spatiotemporal differentiation in these brain regions during a passive and active APD task with respect to place of articulation (PoA), voicing and manner of articulation (MoA). Results demonstrate that in an early stage (50-110 ms), auditory, motor and sensorimotor regions elicit more activation during the passive and active APD task with MoA and active APD task with voicing compared to PoA. In a later stage (130-175 ms), the same auditory and motor regions elicit more activation during the APD task with PoA compared to MoA and voicing, yet only in the active condition, implying important timing differences. Degree of attention influences a frontal network during the APD task with PoA, whereas auditory regions are more affected during the APD task with MoA and voicing. Based on these findings, it can be carefully suggested that APD is supported by the integration of early activation of auditory-acoustic properties in superior temporal regions, more perpetuated for MoA and voicing, and later auditory-to-motor integration in sensorimotor areas, more perpetuated for PoA.