Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis in the era of biological therapy: how the disease changed in more than 20 years of observation in a tertiary referral center in Rome (Italy).

OBJECTIVES: To describe the ophthalmological characteristics in a Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) cohort and to evaluate how therapeutic advances have changed the course of the uveitis. METHODS: Analysis of a retrospective cohort study of consecutive JIA pediatric patients including JIA-associated uveitis (JIA-U) and comparison with a previous study in the same uveitis center assessed before the wide-spread of biological therapy. RESULTS: The total of 49 JIA patients were analyzed, of whom 18 JIA-U, compared with a JIA-U past cohort of 66 patients. Systemic corticosteroids were used significantly less in the current JIA-U group (p = 0.008) than in the past one. JIA-U present cohort was on therapy more frequently with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) than the past group (p = 0.039), mostly treated with methotrexate (93.3%). Furthermore, a larger use of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) was described in the current JIA-U group (p = 0.005) also associated with csDMARDs (p = 0.003). Adalimumab was used more (72.7%) in the present JIA-U cohort compared to a larger treatment with infliximab (61.5%) in the past (p = 0.005). Higher number of uveitis recurrences was observed in the previous cohort compared to the current one (p = 0.005). Fewer complications were described in this study than in the previous: posterior synechiae (p = 0.007), cataract (p < 0.001), band keratopathy (p < 0.001), and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Current therapies reduced the uveitis recurrences and ocular complications including cataract due also to the lower use of corticosteroids. The new close collaboration with the pediatric rheumatologic center in the same University has contributed to the care improvement and decrease of uveitis complications.

Recombinant erythropoietin therapy as an alternative to blood transfusions in infants with hereditary spherocytosis.

INTRODUCTION: In hereditary spherocytosis, erythropoiesis has been described as 'sluggish' during the first months of life. The lack of appropriate erythropoietic response to compensate for increased red cell destruction necessitates blood transfusions in 70-80% of hereditary spherocytosis-affected infants during their first year of life. After this period, less than 30% require regular transfusion support. This transient requirement for transfusion led us to wonder whether anemic hereditary spherocytosis infants, like anemic premature infants, could benefit from recombinant erythropoietin therapy (rHu-Epo). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 16 hereditary spherocytosis infants (age range 16-119 days) with severe anemia, a compassionate open preliminary study was performed. rHu-Epo treatment (1000 IU/kg/week) was instituted together with iron supplementation. Hemoglobin values and reticulocyte counts were repeatedly assessed. RESULTS: In 13 out of 16 infants, prompt increases in reticulocyte counts were noted after the first week of treatment with 1000 IU/kg/week of rHu-Epo. During treatment with Epo these infants maintained clinically acceptable levels of hemoglobin and did not require blood transfusions. As the infants grew and began to mount an adequate erythropoietic response, the rHu-Epo dose could be tapered and the treatment could be discontinued before the age of nine months. CONCLUSION: Epo treatment in most hereditary spherocytosis infants appears to be effective in the management of anemia and could serve as a valuable alternative to packed RBC transfusions.