Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Br J Cancer ; 98(11): 1852-6, 2008 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18506189

ABSTRACT

Exposure to ionising radiation is an established risk factor for many cancers. We conducted a case-control study to investigate whether exposure to low dose ionisation radiation from diagnostic x-ray procedures could be established as a risk factor for prostate cancer. In all 431 young-onset prostate cancer cases and 409 controls frequency matched by age were included. Exposures to barium meal, barium enema, hip x-rays, leg x-rays and intravenous pyelogram (IVP) were considered. Exposures to barium enema (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-4.20) and hip x-rays (adjusted OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.42-3.49) at least 5 years before diagnosis were significantly associated with increased prostate cancer. For those with a family history of cancer, exposures to hip x-rays dating 10 or 20 years before diagnosis were associated with a significantly increased risk of prostate cancer: adjusted OR 5.01, 95% CI 1.64-15.31 and adjusted OR 14.23, 95% CI 1.83-110.74, respectively. Our findings show that exposure of the prostate gland to diagnostic radiological procedures may be associated with increased cancer risk. This effect seems to be modified by a positive family history of cancer suggesting that genetic factors may play a role in this risk association.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Radiography/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Risk Factors , Urography/adverse effects
2.
Br J Nutr ; 99(3): 667-73, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17908366

ABSTRACT

Little is known about the aetiology of brain tumours. One putative factor suggested from animal models is a protective effect of dietary Zn. We tested the hypothesis that increased compared with low dietary Zn intake is protective against brain tumour development. We conducted a population-based case-control study in the UK, of adults aged 18-69 years, between 2001 and 2004 aiming to identify possible risk factors. Dietary information was collected from 637 cases diagnosed with a glioma or meningioma, and 876 controls. Data were obtained from a self-completed FFQ. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted, adjusting for socio-demographic factors, season of questionnaire return, multivitamin supplementation and energy intake. Although a weak protective effect was observed for the third quartile of intake (normal compared with low intake) in the meningioma group, this was limited to the specific brain tumour subtype and quartile, and was not significant after also adjusting for intake of other elements. Overall there was no significant effect of Zn intake. No association or dose-response relationship was observed between increased compared with low Zn intake and risk of glioma or meningioma.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/prevention & control , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Zinc/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Copper/administration & dosage , England/epidemiology , Female , Glioma/epidemiology , Glioma/prevention & control , Humans , Iron, Dietary/administration & dosage , Male , Meningioma/epidemiology , Meningioma/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Scotland/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL