Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 9(2): 305-10, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9540915

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A strong embolic effect of iodized oil/drug mixtures injected in the hepatic artery appeared to be an efficient way of prolonging the contact time between drugs and tumor tissue. Therefore, the authors evaluated arterial and portal embolic effects after hepatic intra-arterial injection of iodized oils and various emulsions of iodized oil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five pigs were monitored for the Doppler resistance index (DRI) in the hepatic artery and wedge hepatic vein pressure (WHVP) during 1 hour after injection of pure iodized oil, ultra-fluid or fluid, and four different emulsions of iodized oil ultra-fluid, into the hepatic artery. RESULTS: Mean area under the curve (AUC) values of DRI increases varied from 20.3 to 24.2 after injection of pure iodized oils or water-in-oil emulsions, and were 13.2 for large-droplet oil-in-water emulsion and 8.2 for small-droplet oil-in-water emulsion. Mean AUC values of WHVP increases varied from 151.6 to 195.6 after injection of pure iodized oils or water-in-oil emulsions, and were 105.5 for large-droplet oil-in-water emulsion and 8.5 for small-droplet oil-in-water emulsion. There was a significant difference in DRI and WHVP modifications between small-droplet oil-in-water emulsions and all other products (P = .001), between the two oil-in-water emulsions and the two water-in-oil emulsions (P = .004), and between the two oil-in-water emulsions and pure iodized oils (P = .002). CONCLUSION: After hepatic intra-arterial injection, water-in-oil emulsions and pure iodized oils provided a stronger embolic effect than oil-in-water emulsion, both in the hepatic artery and in the portal vein.


Subject(s)
Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Emulsions/administration & dosage , Hepatic Artery/physiology , Iodized Oil/administration & dosage , Portal Vein/physiology , Animals , Blood Flow Velocity , Catheterization, Peripheral , Hemodynamics , Hepatic Veins/physiology , Swine , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Vascular Resistance , Venous Pressure
2.
Radiology ; 201(3): 731-5, 1996 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8939223

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To optimize use of iodized oil for diagnostic computed tomography (CT) enhanced with iodized oil and for interstitial radiation therapy with iodine-131-labeled iodized oil, the authors quantified the distribution of iodized oil after injection of different formulations of iodized oil into the hepatic artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: I-125-labeled iodinated ethyl ester of poppyseed oil in two viscosities (iodized oil ultrafluid [viscosity, 0.04 Pa/sec] and iodized oil fluid [viscosity, 0.17 Pa/sec]) was injected (pure forms and three different emulsions of each) into the hepatic artery of rabbits bearing VX2 tumors in the liver. All rabbits received a radiation dose of 4 MBq per kilogram of body weight in 0.1 mL/kg iodized oil. Animals were killed 4 days later, and iodized oil uptake was evaluated in the tumor, nontumorous liver, and lung. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in uptake between pure iodized oil ultrafluid or fluid or between the same type of emulsions made with each type of iodized oil. Lung uptake was significantly higher with pure iodized oil ultrafluid and fluid (19.75 kBq/g +/- 3.25 [standard error of the mean] vs 19.48 kBq/g +/- 6.15, respectively) than with any emulsions (range, 3.72-8.14 kBq/g; mean, 5.68 kBq/g) except the small-droplet oil-in-water emulsion (10.51 kBq/g +/- 1.18). The ratio of tumor to nontumorous liver uptake of iodized oil was significantly higher with large-droplet water-in-oil emulsions made of iodized oil ultrafluid or fluid (10.26 +/- 2.88 and 9.53 +/- 0.64, respectively) than with any other product (range, 4.07-5.38; mean, 4.49). CONCLUSION: Use of large-droplet water-in-oil emulsions limited lung uptake and increased tumor uptake of iodized oil after intraarterial hepatic injection in rabbits bearing VX2 tumors in the liver.


Subject(s)
Iodized Oil/pharmacokinetics , Liver Neoplasms, Experimental/metabolism , Animals , Female , Iodine Radioisotopes/pharmacokinetics , Iodized Oil/chemistry , Liver/metabolism , Lung/metabolism , Neoplasm Transplantation , Rabbits , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Viscosity
3.
Radiology ; 194(1): 165-70, 1995 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7997545

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate circulatory alterations induced by intra-arterial injection of iodized oil and emulsions of iodized oil with an anticancer drug. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The viscosities and stability were evaluated in arterial flow of iodized oil and the emulsions. Doppler ultrasound was used to quantify the embolic effect in the arteries of rabbits. The behavior of doxorubicin and iodized oil in the rat cremaster muscle was studied with videomicroscopy. RESULTS: The emulsions did not break up after injection, and the size of discontinuous-phase droplets did not change. The embolic effect did not correlate with viscosity. The thinnest water-in-oil emulsion had the lowest embolic effect and induced homogeneous distribution of iodized oil droplets in the arterial tree. CONCLUSION: Changes in the formulation of emulsions obtained with the same proportions of drug and iodized oil change the distribution of iodized oil in the arterial tree, the location at which the drug is released, and the embolic effect.


Subject(s)
Arteries/physiopathology , Doxorubicin/pharmacology , Iodized Oil/pharmacology , Abdominal Muscles/blood supply , Animals , Blood Flow Velocity/drug effects , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/chemistry , Emulsions , Injections, Intra-Arterial , Iodized Oil/administration & dosage , Iodized Oil/chemistry , Microcirculation/drug effects , Rabbits , Rats , Viscosity/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL