Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Pneumologie ; 61(1): 46-51, 2007 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17253210

ABSTRACT

This is so far the first published case report of a Nocardia paucivorans infection in an immunocompetent patient. A 54-year-old farmer was hospitalised with a history of coughing and fever for a period of five months. There was no indicator of either primary of secondary immunodeficiency in the prior medical history. A chest X-ray showed pneumonic infiltrates in the right middle und lower lobes, which progressed despite of antibiotic therapy with macrolides. A transbronchial biopsy revealed unspecific granulomatous inflammation of soft tissues. N. paucivorans - grew in cultures of sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, and transbronchial biopsy. Oral antibiotic therapy was started with trimethoprime-sulphamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid. Susceptibility testing revealed high level resistance to TMP/SMX, which was consequently replaced by ciprofloxacin. Six months later, infiltrates had completely resolved and the patient did not report any residual clinical symptoms. The present case showed once again that nocardiosis is not limited to patients with immunodeficiencies. However, conservative combination therapy with oral antibiotics seems to be sufficiently effective for nocardiosis in the immunocompetent patient. For cases of suspected nocardiosis, a step-wise, risk-based diagnostic and therapeutic procedure is proposed.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Nocardia Infections/drug therapy , Nocardia/drug effects , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Nocardia Infections/diagnosis , Nocardia Infections/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology
2.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 35(8): 1033-9, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16120085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In most epidemiological surveys the estimated prevalence of asthma is based on questionnaire responses, which may depend on the individual's perception as well as medical consulting habits in a given population. Therefore, measurement of bronchial hyper-responsiveness as a key feature of asthma has been suggested as an objective parameter for asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to validate questionnaire responses on asthma and wheeze against bronchial response to hypertonic saline (HS) (4.5%) in populations previously shown to have a lower prevalence of asthma and allergies: farmers' children and children from anthroposophic families. METHODS: Children whose parents had completed a written questionnaire in the cross-sectional PARSIFAL-study were drawn from the following four subgroups: 'farm children' (n=183), 'farm reference children' (n=173), 'Steiner schoolchildren' (n=243) and 'Steiner reference children' (n=179). Overall, 319 children with wheeze in the last 12 months and 459 children without wheeze in the last 12 months performed an HS challenge. RESULTS: Odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and measures of association did not differ significantly between the four subgroups. The correlation between the bronchial response to HS and wheeze and asthma questions was moderate and similar for farm children, farm reference children, Steiner schoolchildren and Steiner reference children (kappa for 'wheeze': 0.25, 0.33, 0.31, 0.35, respectively, P=0.754, kappa for 'doctor's diagnosis of asthma': 0.33, 0.19, 0.33, 032, respectively, P=0.499). CONCLUSION: The findings from this study suggest that the reliabilitiy of questionnaire responses on asthma and wheeze is comparable between farmers' children, children raised in families with anthroposophic lifestyle and their respective peers.


Subject(s)
Asthma/diagnosis , Respiratory Sounds/diagnosis , Adolescent , Anthroposophy , Asthma/immunology , Bronchial Provocation Tests , Child , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/immunology , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Respiratory Sounds/immunology , Rural Health , Saline Solution, Hypertonic , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Allergy ; 60(2): 177-84, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15647038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies report pet exposure to be associated with lower risk of asthma and allergies. This 'protective pet effect' has been suggested to result from a modified T-helper (Th)2-cell response, or because of increased microbial load in homes where pets are kept. We examined the associations between pet contact and the occurrence of asthma and allergies in children of the rural Allergy and Endotoxin (ALEX) population, taking farm animal contact, endotoxin and cat allergen levels in mattress dust into account. METHODS: Information about contact with pets and farm animals, asthma and allergy were collected for 812 children by a standardized parents' questionnaire and an interview. Mattress dust endotoxin and cat allergen levels as well as specific IgE and IgG4 antibodies to Fel d1 were determined. RESULTS: Current contact with dogs was inversely associated with diagnosed hay fever (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.57), diagnosed asthma (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.71), sensitization to cat allergen (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-0.99) and to grass pollen (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.94), but not with increased IgG4 levels. Early and current contact with cats were associated with reduced risk of wheezing (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-1.00, and OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.92, respectively) and grass pollen sensitization. Adjustment for farm animal contact but not for endotoxin and cat allergen exposure attenuated these associations and the effect of pet was stronger among farmers' children. CONCLUSION: Although pet exposure was very frequent in this rural population, the inverse relation between current dog contact, asthma and allergy was mostly explained by simultaneously occurring exposure to stable animals or was restricted to farm children. In addition, a subtle form of pet avoidance may contribute to the protective effect of pet.


Subject(s)
Animals, Domestic , Asthma/epidemiology , Environmental Exposure , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Cats , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dogs , Female , Glycoproteins/immunology , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Incidence , Male , Poaceae/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Radioallergosorbent Test
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL