ABSTRACT
Prenatal supplementation of folic acid has been shown to decrease the risk of several congenital malformations. Several studies have recently suggested a potential protective effect of folic acid on certain pediatric cancers. The protective role of prenatal multivitamins has not been elucidated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential protective effect of prenatal multivitamins on several pediatric cancers. Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Toxline, Healthstar, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published in all languages from 1960 to July 2005 on multivitamin supplementation and pediatric cancers. References from all articles collected were reviewed for additional articles. Two blinded independent reviewers assessed the articles for inclusion and exclusion. Rates of cancers in women supplemented with multivitamins were compared with unsupplemented women using a random effects model. Sixty-one articles were identified in the initial search, of which, seven articles met the inclusion criteria. There was an apparent protective effect for leukemia (odds ratio (OR)=0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.50-0.74), pediatric brain tumors (OR=0.73, 95% CI=0.60-0.88) and neuroblastoma (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.42-0.68). In conclusion, maternal ingestion of prenatal multivitamins is associated with a decreased risk for pediatric brain tumors, neuroblastoma, and leukemia. Presently, it is not known which constituent(s) among the multivitamins confer this protective effect.
Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Prenatal Care , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Leukemia/epidemiology , Leukemia/prevention & control , Neuroblastoma/epidemiology , Neuroblastoma/prevention & control , PregnancyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of pentosan polysulfate (Elmiron) compared to placebo in the treatment of interstitial cystitis. METHODS: The data sources used were MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases, and the manufacturer. Bibliographies of articles obtained were reviewed. The keywords used were pentosanpolysulfate, pentosanpolysulfate sodium, and pentosan. Inclusion criteria were blinded selection of English language, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled comparative trials; > or = 8 weeks' duration; > or = 300 mg daily; adult humans with > or = 1 symptoms including pain, urgency, frequency, and nocturia; symptoms for > or = 12 months; normal urinalysis; negative findings for urine culture and cytology. Exclusion criteria were hemorrhagic cystitis; drug-, microbial-, or radiation-induced cystitis; carcinoma in situ; other influencing diseases. The outcome of success was defined as a > or = 50% decrease in pain, urgency, frequency, and nocturia. The number of successes was extracted by blinded investigators, treating withdrawals as failures. The percentage difference in success rates of pentosan polysulfate and placebo, and the number needed to treat (NNT) were determined for each variable; P values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for combined data. Homogeneity of effect was determined by calculating Q (chi-squared). Article quality was assessed using the Chalmers scale to determine if quality affected outcome. Effective inter-rater reliability was determined using Rosenthal's method. Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Four studies were included. Data were extracted from all four studies for pain (n = 398), three for urgency (n = 306), two for frequency (n = 160), and one study for nocturia (n = 106). The differences (95% confidence limits) were pain: 16.6% (95% CI 8%, 25%), NNT = 7; urgency: 13.0% (1.0%, 25%), NNT = 7.5; frequency: 16.7% (2.3%, 31.1%), NNT = 6; nocturia: -1% (-19.8%, 21.8%). P values from homogeneity tests were not significant. Mean quality scores were 63.8%, 48.1%, 50.4%, and 65.6%, respectively, in the four studies; the effective inter-rater reliability was 0.96. Results did not differ when weighted by quality score. CONCLUSIONS: Pentosan polysulfate is more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of pain, urgency, and frequency associated with interstitial cystitis. Pentosan polysulfate is not significantly different from placebo in treating nocturia associated with interstitial cystitis.
Subject(s)
Cystitis, Interstitial/drug therapy , Pentosan Sulfuric Polyester/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Glycosaminoglycans , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to perform a government-perspective economic analysis of the most widely used topical creams [namely, ciclopirox (CIC), clotrimazole (CLO), ketoconazole (KET), miconazole (MIC), and terbinafine (TER)], for the treatment of 2 types of dermatophyte skin infections: dermatophytosis major (excluding onychomycosis) and dermatophytosis minor. A 3-phase approach was used. In phase I, experts were assembled to identify the standard approach for management of fungal infections and a decision tree was constructed to model the process; in phase II, meta-analysis was used to determine success, failure, and relapse rates; and in phase III, economic analyses were performed including cost of regimen, total expected cost and cost-effectiveness analysis. Sensitivity analyses (robustness analyses) were also performed in phase III. It was found that while TER was successful following 1 week of administration for minor infections and after 2 weeks for major infections, duration of drug treatment was usually twice that time. Other comparators (CIC, CLO, KET and MIC) took 4 weeks to achieve a successful outcome. In addition, an extra 2 weeks were often needed to clear both types of infections because the comparators are fungistatic, whereas TER is fungicidal. In the total expected cost analysis, TER had the lowest overall cost of treating patients for both infection categories. It was also responsible for the highest number of disease-free days and, consequently, the lowest cost per disease-free day. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that TER was the most cost-effective topical agent for treating dermatophytosis major (excluding onychomycosis) and dermatophytosis minor.