Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult ; 99(4. Vyp. 2): 43-50, 2022.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36083817

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of therapeutic exercises and chest hardware massage in electrostatic field in patients with COVID-associated viral pneumonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1551 patients admitted to the Clinical Hospital No. 1 (MEDSI Group JSC) with COVID-associated pneumonia between April 01, 2020 and June 15, 2021 (ICD-10 U07.1 and U07.2). Considering inclusion and exclusion criteria, we enrolled 153 patients. All patients were divided into comparable groups and subgroups depending on the methods of rehabilitation treatment and CT stage of viral pneumonia. Lung damage was assessed semi-automatically using Philips Portal v11 COPD software. Rehabilitation measures included therapeutic exercises and chest hardware massage in electrostatic field. therapeutic exercises. RESULTS: Therapeutic exercises significantly reduced severity of lung damage in patients with viral pneumonia CT-2 and no oxygen support (from 28.05% [28; 29.5] at admission to 15.3% [14.2; 19.3] at discharge). It was not observed in patients without rehabilitation treatment and in patients undergoing therapeutic exercises and massage in electrostatic field. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic exercises in patients with COVID-19 and baseline lung damage > 25% and < 50% (CT-2 stage) significantly reduce severity of lung damage at discharge compared to the control group.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia, Viral , Humans , Lung , Massage , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Static Electricity
2.
Anesteziol Reanimatol ; (5): 63-6, 1999.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10560156

ABSTRACT

Comparison of the hypotensive effects of lomir (isradipine) and adalat (nifedipine) in 36 patients showed lomir to be more effective after aortocoronary bypass surgery. Normalization of arterial pressure started 5-10 min after lomir infusion, followed by a 24.5% increase in cardiac output and decrease in peripheral vascular resistance by 43.8%. Arterial pressure did not rise after lomir infusion was discontinued. With adalat, arterial pressure normalized 30 min later, and the therapeutic effect was achieved with a very high dose (5-7 times higher than recommended). Cardiac output did not change, and cardiac arrhythmias were observed in 11.7% patients. Therefore, lomir is a preferable Ca channel blocker for treating postoperative arterial hypertension after aortocoronary bypass surgery.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Calcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage , Hypertension/drug therapy , Isradipine/administration & dosage , Nifedipine/administration & dosage , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Calcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Isradipine/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Nifedipine/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL