Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 14(3): 154-61, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25861837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the KRAS gene predict for resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies, including cetuximab. Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A has been implicated in resistance to anti-EGFR treatment. Abrogation of the VEGF and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathways has the potential to restore cetuximab sensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with histologically documented, measurable, EGFR-expressing, KRAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that had progressed after 5-fluorouracil-based regimens were treated with sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily and intravenous cetuximab weekly in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the response rate (complete response, partial response, and stable disease at 4 cycles). The secondary endpoints included plasma biomarker analysis of angiogenic cytokines and correlative imaging studies with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and zirconium 89-panitumumab. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients enrolled, 26 were evaluable for response. Of the 26 patients evaluated, 4 had stable disease at 4 cycles and 1 had stable disease at 8 cycles. The median progression-free survival was 1.84 months. The common toxicities were rash, diarrhea, and liver enzyme elevations. Of the angiogenic cytokines evaluated, only the placental growth factor increased significantly with treatment (P < .0001). No pharmacodynamic parameters were associated with the treatment response. CONCLUSION: We report the results of a trial that combined cetuximab and sorafenib for the treatment of KRAS-mutated mCRC, with correlative imaging studies and pharmacodynamic angiogenic cytokine profiling as downstream markers of EGFR and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) signaling. No objective responses were observed. Additional development of biomarkers for patient selection is needed to evaluate combined EGFR and VEGFR blockade as a therapeutic option in KRAS-mutated CRC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Niacinamide/administration & dosage , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Patient Selection , Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Sorafenib , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Young Adult
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 23(2): 248-55.e7, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22178041

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A phase I dose escalation study was performed with systemically delivered lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD). The primary objectives were to determine the safe maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic properties, and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of LTLD during this combination therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects eligible for percutaneous or surgical radiofrequency (RF) ablation with primary (n = 9) or metastatic (n = 15) tumors of the liver, with four or fewer lesions as large as 7 cm in diameter, were included. RF ablation was initiated 15 minutes after starting a 30-minute intravenous LTLD infusion. Dose levels between 20 mg/m(2) and 60 mg/m(2) were evaluated. Magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and computed tomography were performed at predetermined intervals before and after treatment until evidence of recurrence was seen, administration of additional antitumor treatment was performed, or a total of 3 years had elapsed. RESULTS: DLT criteria were met at 60 mg/m(2), and the MTD was defined as 50 mg/m(2). RF ablation was performed during the peak of the plasma concentration-time curve in an effort to yield maximal drug deposition. LTLD produced reversible, dose-dependent neutropenia and leukopenia. CONCLUSIONS: LTLD can be safely administered systemically at the MTD (50 mg/m(2)) in combination with RF ablation, with limited and manageable toxicity. Further evaluation of this agent combined with RF ablation is warranted to determine its role in the management of liver tumors.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/methods , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Hyperthermia, Induced/methods , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL