A qualitative exploration of dentists' opioid prescribing decisions within U.S. veterans affairs facilities.

ABSTRACT: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States and provides dental care to approximately one-half million veterans annually. In response to the opioid crisis, the VA released several opioid risk mitigation strategies. Although opioid prescribing by VA dentists has decreased on the whole, the implementation experiences at the level of dentists remains unclear. Our objective was to explore the barriers and facilitators that affect opioid decision making for management of acute dental pain among VA dentists. Dentists practicing in the VA facilities with the highest and lowest volume of opioid prescriptions were recruited. Standardized qualitative interviews by telephone followed a semistructured guide designed around the Capability (C), Opportunity (O), Motivation (M), and Behaviour (B) model. Audio recordings were transcribed and independently double-coded using NVivo to identify potential targets for future guideline-based opioid interventions. Of 395 eligible general and specialty dentists, 90 (24.8%) completed an interview representing 33 VA facilities. Opportunities for prescribing opioids included 1) completion of dental procedures associated with acute dental pain, 2) caring for patients who presented with existing dental pain, and 3) responding to patient opioid requests. Capabilities included using resources (eg, electronic medical records), clinical judgement (eg, evaluation of medical history including medication use), communication skills, and ability to screen for opioid misuse. Motivation themes focused on alleviating patients' acute dental pain. Barriers and facilitators of opioid prescribing varied across facilities. The results can offer intervention targets for continued opioid risk mitigation efforts.

Treatment of extensively-drug resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter and impact on clinical outcomes in U.S. veterans affairs (VA) medical centers.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) are limited, leaving a knowledge gap in best practices for treatment. This study described treatments and outcomes of extensively-drug resistant (XDR) AB. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients with XDRAB (non-susceptible to at least 1 agent in all but 2 or fewer classes) and antibiotic treatment between 2012 and 2018 at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Descriptive statistics summarized antibiotics; propensity score adjusted regression models were fit to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-six patients with 439 XDRAB cultures and Gram-negative targeted antibiotic treatment were included. One hundred and eighteen (43%) patients received monotherapy while 158 (57%) received combination therapy, most commonly including a carbapenem (n = 106, 67%) and polymyxin (n = 66, 42%). One hundred and eighty-four (67%) patients received inadequate treatment. In adjusted models, combination therapy did not decrease the odds of in-hospital (aOR 1.24, 95%CI 0.60-2.59) or 30-day (aOR 1.43, 95%CI 0.86-2.38) mortality, or median postculture length of stay (aIRR 1.11, 95%CI 0.86-1.43). Likewise, receipt of inadequate treatment was not associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this national cohort of patients with XDRAB, neither combination therapy nor receipt of adequate treatment improved outcomes. Further research is needed on optimal management of this difficult-to-treat pathogen with few effective antibiotic options.

Outpatient Prescribing of Antibiotics and Opioids by Veterans Health Administration Providers, 2015-2017.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotics and opioids are targeted by public health and stewardship communities for reductions in prescribing across the country. This study evaluates trends and factors associated with outpatient prescribing by dental and medical providers in a large integrated health system. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of national dental and medical outpatient visits from Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in 2015-2017; analyzed in 2019-2020. Antibiotic and opioid prescribing rates were assessed by provider and facility characteristics. Multivariable Poisson regression adjusted for repeated measures by the provider was used to assess the independent association between facility and provider characteristics and rate of prescribing. RESULTS: Over the study period, 4,625,840 antibiotic and 10,380,809 opioid prescriptions were identified for 115,625,890 visits. Physicians prescribed most antibiotics (67%). Dentists prescribed 6% of the antibiotics but had the highest per-visit antibiotic prescribing rate compared to medical providers (6.75 vs 3.90 prescriptions per 100 visits, p<0.0001), which was largely driven by dental specialists. By contrast, dentists had lower opioid prescribing than medical providers (3.02 vs 9.20 prescriptions per 100 visits, p<0.0001). Overall, antibiotic and opioid prescribing decreased over time, with opioids having the greatest decreases (-28.0%). In multivariable analyses, U.S. geographic region, rurality, and complexity were associated with prescribing for both drug classes. Opioid and antibiotic prescribing were positively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Although antibiotic and opioid prescribing has decreased, there are still important target areas for improvement. Interventions need to be tailored to community characteristics such as rurality and provider type.

Assessment of the Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescriptions for Infection Prophylaxis Before Dental Procedures, 2011 to 2015.

Importance: Antibiotics are recommended before certain dental procedures in patients with select comorbidities to prevent serious distant site infections. Objective: To assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures using Truven, a national integrated health claims database. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study. Dental visits from 2011 to 2015 were linked to medical and prescription claims from 2009 to 2015. The dates of analysis were August 2018 to January 2019. Participants were US patients with commercial dental insurance without a hospitalization or extraoral infection 14 days before antibiotic prophylaxis (defined as a prescription with ≤2 days' supply dispensed within 7 days before a dental visit). Exposures: Presence or absence of cardiac diagnoses and dental procedures that manipulated the gingiva or tooth periapex. Main Outcomes and Measures: Appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis was defined as a prescription dispensed before a dental visit with a procedure that manipulated the gingiva or tooth periapex in patients with an appropriate cardiac diagnosis. To assess associations between patient or dental visit characteristics and appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, multivariable logistic regression was used. A priori hypothesis tests were performed with an α level of .05. Results: From 2011 to 2015, antibiotic prophylaxis was prescribed for 168 420 dental visits for 91 438 patients (median age, 63 years; interquartile range, 55-72 years; 57.2% female). Overall, these 168 420 dental visits were associated with 287 029 dental procedure codes (range, 1-14 per visit). Most dental visits were classified as diagnostic (70.2%) and/or preventive (58.8%). In 90.7% of dental visits, a procedure was performed that would necessitate antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk cardiac patients. Prevalent comorbidities include prosthetic joint devices (42.5%) and cardiac conditions at the highest risk of adverse outcome from infective endocarditis (20.9%). Per guidelines, 80.9% of antibiotic prophylaxis prescriptions before dental visits were unnecessary. Clindamycin was more likely to be unnecessary relative to amoxicillin (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15). Prosthetic joint devices (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 2.22-2.41), tooth implant procedures (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.45-1.89), female sex (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.17-1.25), and visits occurring in the western United States (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25) were associated with unnecessary antibiotic prophylaxis. Conclusion and Relevance: More than 80% of antibiotics prescribed for infection prophylaxis before dental visits were unnecessary. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in dental practices is an opportunity to improve antibiotic prescribing for infection prophylaxis.

Development of a unit-specific antibiogram and planning for implementation: Preimplementation findings.

This practice forum reports experiences with the development of a unit-specific antibiogram and planning for its implementation. Involvement of internal and external facilitators was a key strategy for addressing issues, including data limitations, coordination, and planning. These activities were incorporated and reported as part of the facility's broader antimicrobial stewardship program, and represent the first step in a set of planned projects to evaluate the impact of antibiograms on provider behavior and patient outcomes.

Knowledge and use of antimicrobial stewardship resources by spinal cord injury providers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge and the use of antimicrobial stewardship resources, such as hospital antibiograms and infectious disease consultants, by spinal cord injury or disorder (SCI/D) providers. DESIGN AND SETTING: Anonymous Internet-based, cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 314 SCI/D physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants who prescribe antibiotics were invited to complete a survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Knowledge of and behaviors related to antibiograms and infectious disease (ID) consults. RESULTS: A total of 118 providers (80 physicians, 20 nurse practitioners, 18 physician assistants) completed the survey (37.6% response rate). Approximately one-third of respondents indicated that they did not have access to (11.0%) or were unsure of (28.0%) the existence of facility antibiograms. Half of the providers indicated that they never used antibiograms to determine treatment for their SCI/D patients. Respondent factors associated with viewing facility antibiograms were older age, employment at SCI/D specialty centers, a longer duration since completion of training, and years of SCI/D patient care. Nearly all respondents (95%) indicated that they believed that improving access to antibiotic prescribing data or antibiograms would reduce antibiotic resistance. More than one-third reported that they never or seldom used ID consults. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of SCI/D providers who prescribe antibiotics do not have access to facility antibiograms or are unaware of their existence and thus could not use them for determining antibiotic treatment. Interventions could include formal education of providers on how to access antibiograms and the use of ID physicians as a resource, as well as providing technologic support, such as electronic facility-level antibiograms as part of the medical record system, which can be easily identified if a provider is making a decision on an antibiotic.