Functional constipation refractory to medical management: The colon is the problem.

BACKGROUND: Management of refractory constipation in children has not been standardized. We propose a protocolized approach which includes a contrast enema, anorectal manometry and exclusion of Hirschsprung disease (HD). For those without HD or with normal sphincters, an assessment of the colonic motility may be needed. The subgroups of dysmotility include (1) slow motility with contractions throughout, (2) segmental dysmotility (usually the sigmoid), or (3) a diffusely inert colon. We offered a Malone appendicostomy in all groups with the hope that this would avoid colonic resection in most cases. METHODS: Patients with medically refractory constipation were reviewed at a single institution (2020 to 2021). For patients without HD or an anal sphincter problem, assessment of colonic motility using colonic manometry was performed followed by a Malone appendicostomy for antegrade flushes. RESULTS: Of 196 patients evaluated for constipation refractory to medical management, 22 were felt to have a colonic motility cause. These patients underwent colonic manometry and Malone appendicostomy. 13 patients (59%) had a slow colon but with HAPCs throughout, 5 (23%) had segmental dysmotility, and 4 (18%) had a diffuse colonic dysmotility. 19 (86%) responded well to antegrade flushes with 17 reporting no soiling and 2 having occasional accidents. 3 patients (14%) failed flushes and underwent a colon resection within 6-month following Malone procedure. CONCLUSION: We propose a protocol for medically refractory constipation which provides a collaborative framework to standardize evaluation and management of these patients with antegrade flushes, which aids in avoidance of colonic resection in most cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Variation in bowel preparation among pediatric surgeons for elective colorectal surgery: A problem of equipoise or a knowledge gap of the available clinical evidence?

PURPOSE: Despite rigorous data from adult literature demonstrating that oral antibiotics (OA) reduce infectious complications and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) alone does not, MBP alone remains the preferred approach among pediatric surgeons. We aimed to explore the nature of this discrepancy through a survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association membership. METHODS: Surgeons were queried for their choice of bowel preparation, factors influencing their practice, and their impression of the strength and relevance of the adult literature to pediatric practice. RESULTS: Surgeons who used MBP alone (31%) cited a reduction in stool burden and infectious complications as important factors, whereas surgeons choosing not to use OA (70%) reported a lack of benefit in reducing infectious complications as the primary reason. Although 53% of surgeons reported that evidence from adult literature was the most important influence, 73% of surgeons reported there was poor evidence supporting the use of OA (±MBP), and only 25% used a preparation supported by adult randomized data. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation exists among pediatric surgeons in the perceived utility of MBP and OA. Although the majority of pediatric surgeons cited the adult literature as the strongest influence on their practice, this is not consistent with stated perceptions or practice.

Use of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics for elective colorectal procedures in children: is current practice evidence-based?

PURPOSE: It is well established through randomized trials that oral antibiotics given with or without a mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) prior to colorectal procedures reduce complications, while MBP given alone provides no benefit. We aimed to characterize trends surrounding bowel preparation in children and determine whether contemporary practice is evidence-based. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing colorectal procedures at 42 children's hospitals (1/2/2007-12/31/2011) was performed. Patients were analyzed for diagnosis, pre-admission status, and inpatient bowel preparation. Bowel preparation was considered evidence-based if oral antibiotics were utilized with or without a MBP. RESULTS: 49% of all patients were pre-admitted (n=5,473), and the most common diagnoses were anorectal malformations (55%), inflammatory bowel disease (26%), and Hirschsprung's Disease (19%). The most common preparation approaches were MBP alone (54.3%), MBP+oral antibiotics (18.8%), and oral antibiotics alone (4.2%), although significant variation was found in hospital-specific rates for each approach (MBP alone: 0-96.1%, MBP+oral antibiotics: 0-83.6%, orals alone: 0-91.6%, p<0.0001). Only 22.9% of all patients received an evidence-based preparation (range by hospital: 0-92.3%, p<0.0001), and this rate decreased significantly during the five-year study period (27.6% in 2007 vs. 17.3% in 2011, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: According to the best available clinical evidence, less than a quarter of all children pre-admitted for elective colorectal procedures receive a bowel preparation proven to reduce infectious complications.