Sex-specific benefits of sirolimus-eluting stent on long-term outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study trial.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the relation between female sex and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) use on long-term outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: There are no data on sex-specific differences in long-term benefit of SES use compared with bare-metal stent (BMS) use among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the MULTISTRATEGY trial. Hazard ratios (HRs) of events with 95% CI for sex and stent type were computed using Cox proportional regression with adjustment for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 744 patients, 64 years old (55-73 years old), 179 (24.1%) women, were enrolled. After a follow-up of 1,080 days, SES use was associated with a significant reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events, that is, the composite of all-cause death, reinfarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) (13.9% vs 23.6%, adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, P = .026) and of TVR (6.1% vs 15.1%, adjusted HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.63, P < .001) in men. Conversely, SES use was not associated to a better outcome among women (major adverse cardiovascular events 21.9% in SES vs 18.2% in the BMS group, adjusted HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.53-3.02, P = .59; TVR 6.6% vs 9.1%, adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.17-2.21, P = .46). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, the clinical benefit of SES use, over BMS, at 3-year follow-up was restricted to men and was not observed among women.

A case of fatal stent thrombosis after Carbostent implantation: is clopidogrel alone antiplatelet therapy a safe alternative to aspirin alone antiplatelet therapy?

We describe a case of fatal stent thrombosis after Carbostent implantation and clopidogrel alone antiplatelet therapy in a patient affected by rectal cancer who does not tolerate aspirin. He had three-vessel disease, with occlusion of the right and left anterior descending coronary artery and a severe stenosis of the proximal left circumflex. High-risk circumflex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed under left ventricular assistance by Impella device with an optimal final angiographic result. After 2 h, however, the patient developed chest pain with marked ST segment elevation in the infero-lateral leads, due to stent thrombosis, and hypotention which rapidly degenerated into cardiac arrest, electromechanical dissociation and death. At the present time the choice between PCI at high risk of stent thrombosis followed by low risk cancer resection and cancer resection at high risk of peri-operative myocardial infarction followed by low risk PCI remains difficult.