Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pain Res Manag ; 2020: 3873098, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32148599

ABSTRACT

Knee osteoarthritis is a common painful degenerative condition affecting the aging Canadian population. In addition to pain and disability, osteoarthritis is associated with depression, comorbid conditions such as diabetes, and increased caregiver burden. It is predicted to cost the Canadian healthcare system $7.6 billion dollars by 2031. Despite its high cost and prevalence, controversy persists in the medical community regarding optimal therapies to treat knee osteoarthritis. A variety of medications like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories and opioids can cause severe side effects with limited benefits. Total knee arthroplasty, although a definitive management, comes with risk such as postoperative infections, revisions, and chronic pain. Newer injectable therapies are gaining attention as alternatives to medications because of a safer side effect profile and are much less invasive than a joint replacement. Platelet-rich plasma is beginning to replace the more common injectable therapies of intra-articular corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid, but larger trials are needed to confirm this effect. Small studies have examined prolotherapy and stem cell therapy and demonstrate some benefits. Trials involving genicular nerve block procedures have been successful. As treatments evolve, injectable therapies may offer a safe and effective pathway for patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Injections, Intra-Articular , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Canada , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Prolotherapy/methods , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods
2.
Pain Manag ; 9(6): 535-541, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31782695

ABSTRACT

Cluster headache (CH) is a primary headache disorder. The use of neuromodulation in treatment of CH is well documented. The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has long been a target for management of CH. Intervention at the level of the SPG can interrupt the trigemino-autonomic reflex, which mediates CH pain. The Pulsante system is the only device on the market created for SPG stimulation. The Pulsante device consists of the device body, a lead with six stimulating electrodes placed in the pterygopalatine fossa, and a fixation plate to allow anchoring of the device to the maxilla. Stimulation is administered via a patient-controlled handheld remote control held over the cheek. SPG stimulation is an important treatment option for CH patients.


Subject(s)
Cluster Headache/therapy , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Pain Management/instrumentation , Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Humans , Pain Management/methods , Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block/methods , Treatment Outcome
3.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 23(9): 68, 2019 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31359257

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: To provide an overview of current interventional pain management techniques for primary headaches with a focus on peripheral nerve stimulation and nerve blocks. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite a plethora of treatment modalities, some forms of headaches remain intractable to conservative therapies. Interventional pain modalities have found a niche in treating headaches. Individuals resistant to common regimens, intolerant to pharmaceutical agents, or those with co-morbid factors that cause interactions with their therapies are some instances where interventions could be considered in the therapeutic algorithm. In this review, we will discuss these techniques including peripheral nerve stimulation, third occipital nerve block (TON), lesser occipital nerve block (LON), greater occipital nerve block (GON), sphenopalatine block (SPG), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and cervical epidural steroid injections (CESI). Physicians have used several interventional techniques to treat primary headaches. While many can be treated pharmacologically, those who continue to suffer from refractory or severe headaches may see tremendous benefit from a range of more invasive treatments which focus on directly inhibiting the painful nerves. While there is a plethora of evidence suggesting these methods are effective and possibly durable interventions, there is still a need for large, prospective, randomized trials to clearly demonstrate their efficacy.


Subject(s)
Disease Management , Early Medical Intervention/methods , Headache Disorders/diagnosis , Headache Disorders/therapy , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Early Medical Intervention/trends , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Electric Stimulation Therapy/trends , Headache Disorders/physiopathology , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL