ABSTRACT
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome associated with a highly elevated lifetime cancer risk. This and the recommended intense surveillance program represent a large psychological burden on families. In order to develop targeted psychosocial interventions, we conducted a needs assessment. Adults (≥18 years) with LFS were included via regular hospital visits and online support groups and newsletters. Individuals filled out a questionnaire addressing among others: fear of progression (FoP-questionnaire, short-form), health-related quality of life (HRQoL, Short-Form Health Survey-12), distress (National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer), perceived cancer risk, and aspects of surveillance adherence. Collecting data over a 14-month period (March 2020 - June 2021), 70 adults were recruited (female = 58, 82.9%; mean age = 41.53 years). With mean mental component scores (MCS) of 42.28 (SD = 10.79), and physical component scores (PCS) of 48.83 (SD = 10.46), HRQoL was low in 34.8% (physical) and 59.4% (mental) of individuals when applying a mean cut-off of 45.4 (PCS) and 47.5 (MCS) to indicate poor HRQoL. High levels of FoP and distress were present in 68.6% and 69.1% of the participants, respectively. Performing a multiple linear regression on MCS and PCS, no sociodemographic variable was shown to be significant. FoP (ß = -0.33, p < 0.05) and distress (ß = -0.34, p < 0.05) were significantly associated with MCS. Individuals in our sample were burdened more than expected, with the majority reporting low levels of (mental) HRQoL, high distress, and FoP. Psychosocial support is necessary to help individuals with LFS (survivors as well as "previvors") increase their HRQoL, as it is crucial to survival.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Although the vast majority of COVID-19 cases are treated in primary care, patients' experiences during home isolation have been little studied. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients with acute COVID-19 and to identify challenges after the initial adaptation of the German health system to the pandemic (after first infection wave from February to June 2020). Methods: A mixed-method convergent design was used to gain a holistic insight into patients experience. The study consisted of a cross-sectional survey, open survey answers and semi-structured telephone interviews. Descriptive analysis was performed on quantitative survey answers. Between group differences were calculated to explore changes after the first infection wave. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on open survey answers and interviews. The results were then compared within a triangulation protocol. Results: A total of 1100 participants from all German states were recruited by 145 general practitioners from August 2020 to April 2021, 42 additionally took part in qualitative interviews. Disease onset varied from February 2020 to April 2021. After the first infection wave, more participants were tested positive during the acute disease (88.8%; 95.2%; P < 0.001). Waiting times for tests (mean 4.5 days, SD 4.1; 2.7days, SD 2.6, P < 0.001) and test results (mean 2.4 days, SD 1.9; 1.8 days, SD 1.3, P < 0.001) decreased. Qualitative results indicated that the availability of repeated testing and antigen tests reduced insecurities, transmission and related guilt. Although personal consultations at general practices increased (6.8%; 15.5%, P < 0.001), telephone consultation remained the main mode of consultation (78.5%) and video remained insignificant (1.9%). The course of disease, the living situation and social surroundings during isolation, access to health care, personal resilience, spirituality and feelings of guilt and worries emerged as themes influencing the illness experience. Challenges were contact management and adequate provision of care during home isolation. A constant contact person within the health system helped against feelings of care deprivation, uncertainty and fear. Conclusions: Our study highlights that home isolation of individuals with COVID-19 requires a holistic approach that considers all aspects of patient care and effective coordination between different care providers.