Altered language processing in autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features (ADPEAF) is an idiopathic focal epilepsy syndrome with auditory symptoms or receptive aphasia as major ictal manifestations, frequently associated with mutations in the leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) gene. Although affected subjects do not have structural abnormalities detected on routine MRI, a lateral temporal malformation was identified through high resolution MRI in one family. We attempted to replicate this finding and to assess auditory and language processing in ADPEAF using fMRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG). METHODS: We studied 17 subjects (10 affected mutation carriers, 3 unaffected carriers, 4 noncarriers) in 7 ADPEAF families, each of which had a different LGI1 mutation. Subjects underwent high-resolution structural MRI, fMRI with an auditory description decision task (ADDT) and a tone discrimination task, and MEG. A control group comprising 26 volunteers was also included. RESULTS: We found no evidence of structural abnormalities in any of the 17 subjects. On fMRI with ADDT, subjects with epilepsy had significantly less activation than controls. On MEG with auditory stimuli, peak 2 auditory evoked field latency was significantly delayed in affected individuals compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the previous report of a lateral temporal malformation in autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features (ADPEAF). However, our fMRI and magnetoencephalography data suggest that individuals with ADPEAF have functional impairment in language processing.

Regional cerebral blood flow during auditory responsive naming: evidence for cross-modality neural activation.

One issue of continuing debate in language research concerns whether the brain holds separate representations for semantic information through the auditory vs visual modalities. Regardless of whether we hear, see or read meaningful information, our brains automatically activate both auditory and visual semantic associations to the sensory input. The prominent models for how the brain makes these cross-modality associations holds that semantic information conveyed through either sensory input modality is represented in a shared semantic system comprising the traditionally identified language areas in the brain. A few recent case reports as well as activation imaging studies, have challenged this notion by demonstrating category-specific organization within the semantic system in spatially discrete brain regions. Neither view posits a role for primary sensory cortices in semantic processing. We obtained positron emission tomographic (PET) images while subjects performed an auditory responsive naming task, an auditory analog to visual object naming. Subjects heard and responded to descriptions of concrete objects while blindfolded to prevent visual stimulation. Our results showed that, in addition to traditional language centers, auditory language input produced reciprocal activation in primary and secondary visual brain regions, just as if the language stimuli had entered in the visual modality. These findings provide evidence for a distributed semantic system in which sensory-specific semantic modules are mutually interactive, operating directly onto early sensory processing centers.

Noninvasive assessment of language dominance in children and adolescents with functional MRI: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of language organization is crucial in patients considered for epilepsy surgery. In children, the current techniques, intra-carotid amobarbital test (IAT) for language dominance, and cortical electrostimulation mapping (ESM), are invasive and risky. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an alternative method for noninvasive functional mapping, through the detection of the hemodynamic changes associated with neuronal activation. We used fMRI, to assess language dominance in children with partial epilepsy. METHODS: Eleven right handed children and adolescents performed a word generation task during fMRI acquisition focused on the frontal lobes. Areas where the signal time course correlated with the test paradigm (r = 0.7) were considered activated. Extent and magnitude of signal changes were used to calculate asymmetry indices. Seven patients had IAT, ESM, or surgery outcome available for comparison. RESULTS: fMRI language dominance always agreed with IAT (6 cases) and ESM (1 case), showing left dominance in six and bilateral language in one. fMRI demonstrated left dominance in three additional children, and right dominance in one with early onset of left temporal epilepsy. Four children whose initial studies were equivocal due to noncompliance or motion artifacts were restudied successfully. CONCLUSIONS: fMRI can be used to assess language lateralization noninvasively in children. It has the potential to replace current functional mapping techniques in patients, and to provide important data on brain development.