Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 61(11): 1609-1621, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a meropenem population pharmacokinetic model in critically ill children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy and simulate dosing regimens to optimize patient exposure. METHODS: Meropenem plasma concentration was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Meropenem pharmacokinetics was investigated using a non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compute the optimal scheme of administration, according to the target of a 100% inter-dose interval time in which concentration is one to four times above the minimum inhibitory concentration (100% fT>1-4×MIC). RESULTS: A total of 27 patients with a median age of 4 [interquartile range 0-11] years, a median body weight of 16 [range 7-35] kg receiving continuous renal replacement therapy were included. Concentration-time courses were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order elimination. Body weight (BW) produced significant effects on volume of distribution (V) and BW and continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate (Qeff) produced significant effects on clearance (CL): [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], where Vpop and CLpop estimates were 32.5 L and 5.88 L/h, respectively, normalized to a 70-kg BW and median Qeff at 1200 mL/h. Using this final model and Monte Carlo simulations, for patients with Qeff over 1200 mL/h, meropenem continuous infusion was adequate in most cases to attain 100% fT>1-4xMIC. For bacterial infections with a low minimum inhibitory concentration (≤2 mg/L), meropenem intermitent administration was appropriate for patients weighing more than 20 kg with Qeff <500 mL/h and for patients weighing more than 10 kg with Qeff <100 mL/h. CONCLUSIONS: Meropenem exposure in critically ill children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy needs dosing adjustments to the minimum inhibitory concentration that take into account body weight and the continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate.


Subject(s)
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy , Child , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Meropenem/pharmacokinetics , Critical Illness/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Body Weight , Renal Replacement Therapy
2.
Ther Drug Monit ; 44(2): 319-327, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35292609

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Septic critically ill children are at a high risk of inadequate antibiotic exposure, requiring them to undergo therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The aim of this study was to describe the use of TDM for antibiotics in critically ill children. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-center observational study between June and December 2019, with all children treated with antibiotics in a pediatric intensive care unit located in a French university hospital. Standard clinical and laboratory data were recorded. Blood samples were collected for routine laboratory tests, and plasma antibiotic levels were assayed using validated analytical methods. RESULTS: A total of 209 children received antibiotics. TDM was performed in 58 patients (27.8%) who had a greater mean organ dysfunction (according to the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference) (3 versus 1 in the non-TDM group; P < 0.05) and were treated with antibiotics for longer. A total of 208 samples were analyzed. The median [interquartile range] assay turnaround time was 3 (1-5) days, and 48 (46.2%) of the 104 initial antibiotic concentration values were below the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. A total of 34 (46%) of the 74 off-target TDM measurements available before the end of the antibiotic treatment prompted dose adjustment. This dose adjustment increased the proportion of on-target TDM measurements (70% versus 20% without adjustment). Subsequent measurements of the minimum inhibitory concentration showed that the use of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing's epidemiological cutoff values led to underestimation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment in 10 cases (20%). CONCLUSIONS: TDM seems to be an effective means of optimizing antibiotic exposure in critically ill children. This requires timely plasma antibiotic assays and minimum inhibitory concentration measurements. It is important to define which patients should undergo TDM and how this monitoring should be managed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Monitoring , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Critical Illness/therapy , Drug Monitoring/methods , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL