Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 93(6): 546-54, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25545196

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of oral antioxidant supplementation (OAS) on primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) over a 2-year follow-up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, 117 eyes of 117 patients with mild or moderate POAG and intraocular pressure under control with topical antiglaucoma medications were recruited and randomly divided into three groups according to supplementation: (1) OAS with (ICAPS R(®) - Alcon Laboratories, n = 26); (2) OAS without ω-3 fatty acids (OFTAN MACULA(®) - Laboratorios Esteve, n = 28); and (3) a control group without OAS (n = 63). They all underwent visual field (VF) tests (Humphrey 24-2) and scans using a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) device (RTVue-100) at the beginning of the study and 2 years later. Mean deviation (MD), standard pattern deviation (PSD), peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) parameters were considered for the analysis. Patients were also classified according to MD deterioration (fast deterioration vs. slow deterioration). RESULTS: Visual field global indices, peripapillary RNFL thickness and macular GCC thickness showed no differences among the groups at the beginning and end of the follow-up. Besides all the comparisons among groups for differences before and after the follow-up of the MD, PSD, RNFL and GCC parameters were also non-significant. The proportions of patients according to MD deterioration were similar among the groups and subgroups (p > 0.05 for all the comparisons). CONCLUSION: Oral antioxidant supplementation with or without ω-3 fatty acids does not appear useful as an adjuvant treatment of mild/moderate POAG in the short term.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/administration & dosage , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Fibers/drug effects , Prospective Studies , Retinal Ganglion Cells/drug effects , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Visual Acuity/drug effects , Visual Acuity/physiology , Visual Field Tests , Visual Fields/drug effects , Visual Fields/physiology
2.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 42(5): 278-283, mayo 2010. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-85232

ABSTRACT

ObjetivoDescribir la atención domiciliaria que ofrecen los equipos móviles de rehabilitación-fisioterapia (EMRF) como respuesta a las necesidades de la población dependiente, las características que tiene su aplicación y las consecuencias que produce sobre el paciente y su independencia funcional.DiseñoEstudio descriptivo transversal desde 2004 hasta junio de 2007.EmplazamientoMedio comunitario. Los EMRF de atención primaria en Almería.ParticipantesEn total 1.093 pacientes incluidos en el programa.Mediciones principalesSe recogió sistemáticamente el estado de salud de los pacientes (proceso discapacitante principal, motivos de inclusión en el tratamiento, valoración funcional inicial y final e índice de Barthel), los datos sobre la atención fisioterapéutica y el n.o de sesiones.ResultadosUn 64,2% de la muestra fueron mujeres; la edad media fue de 78 años. El tiempo medio de espera para su valoración fue de 4 días y hubo una gran diversidad de procesos discapacitantes principales que han quedado descritos. Existió un elevado porcentaje de síntomas de grave deterioro motor, dolor y debilidad muscular. El 88,6% de los pacientes realizó tratamiento fisioterapéutico; el 11,1% de los pacientes fisioterapia y tratamiento ocupacional y el 0,3% de los pacientes tratamiento ortésico. El número medio de sesiones fue de 12,85. Se describe la variación en el índice de Barthel final tras la intervención realizada (cinesiterapia [61,9%]; combinada con electroterapia [10,2%]; cinesiterapia y educación al cuidador [14,5%], etc.).ConclusionesSe aporta información valiosa respecto a las características de la población geriátrica y dependiente así como la ayuda fisioterapéutica que viene recibiendo y cómo se lleva a cabo el proceso(AU)


ObjectiveTo describe the home care provided by mobile rehabilitation-physiotherapy teams as a response to the needs of the dependent population, the characteristics of their application, and the results they have on patients and their functional independence.DesignA descriptive, cross-sectional study from 2004 to June 2007.SettingCommunity setting. Mobile rehabilitation-physiotherapy teams from Primary Care in Almeria.ParticipantsA total of 1093 patients were included in the programme.Main measurementsData were collected on, the state of the patients’ health (primary disabling process, reasons for inclusion in the treatment, initial and final functional assessment and Barthel Index); details of physiotherapy treatment, and number of sessions.ResultsOf the total sample, the mean age was 78 years and 64.2% were female. The mean waiting time for their assessment was 4 days and there was a wide variety of primary disabling processes described. There was a high percentage of symptoms of severe motor deterioration, pain and muscle weakness. Physiotherapy treatment was given in 88.6%, physiotherapy and occupational therapy in 11.1%, and orthopaedic treatment in 0.3%, of the patients. The mean number of sessions was 12.85. The variation in the Barthel Index after the final therapy was given was, 61.9% for kinesiotherapy, 10.2% combined with electrotherapy, and 14.5% for kinesiotherapy and carer education.ConclusionsValuable information is provided as regards the characteristics of the geriatric and dependent population, as well as the physiotherapy help they are receiving, and also how the procedure is carried out(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Physical Therapy Department, Hospital/classification , Physical Therapy Department, Hospital/ethics , Physical Therapy Department, Hospital , Physical Therapy Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Physical Therapy Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapy Department, Hospital/trends , Physical Therapy Specialty/education , Physical Therapy Specialty/statistics & numerical data , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/economics , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/ethics , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/organization & administration , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/supply & distribution , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/statistics & numerical data , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/trends , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based
3.
Aten Primaria ; 42(5): 278-83, 2010 May.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19942323

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the home care provided by mobile rehabilitation-physiotherapy teams as a response to the needs of the dependent population, the characteristics of their application, and the results they have on patients and their functional independence. DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional study from 2004 to June 2007. SETTING: Community setting. Mobile rehabilitation-physiotherapy teams from Primary Care in Almeria. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1093 patients were included in the programme. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Data were collected on, the state of the patients' health (primary disabling process, reasons for inclusion in the treatment, initial and final functional assessment and Barthel Index); details of physiotherapy treatment, and number of sessions. RESULTS: Of the total sample, the mean age was 78 years and 64.2% were female. The mean waiting time for their assessment was 4 days and there was a wide variety of primary disabling processes described. There was a high percentage of symptoms of severe motor deterioration, pain and muscle weakness. Physiotherapy treatment was given in 88.6%, physiotherapy and occupational therapy in 11.1%, and orthopaedic treatment in 0.3%, of the patients. The mean number of sessions was 12.85. The variation in the Barthel Index after the final therapy was given was, 61.9% for kinesiotherapy, 10.2% combined with electrotherapy, and 14.5% for kinesiotherapy and carer education. CONCLUSIONS: Valuable information is provided as regards the characteristics of the geriatric and dependent population, as well as the physiotherapy help they are receiving, and also how the procedure is carried out.


Subject(s)
Mobile Health Units/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapy Modalities , Primary Health Care , Rehabilitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL