Urethral and bladder neck stenosis after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: Analysis of risk factors in a series of 1003 patients.

We assessed the incidence and risks factors of bladder neck and urethral stenosis after Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate. Patients who underwent surgery at two centres were retrospectively reviewed (December 2014-June 2020). Exclusion criteria: previous urethral/prostatic surgery, pelvic irradiation, prostate cancer, neurogenic bladder, history of bladder neck and urethral stenosis, concomitant transurethral surgery, active urinary tract infection. Significant variables at univariate analysis (p < 0.05) were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis to establish their association with bladder neck/urethral stenosis. One thousand and three patients were included. Median age was 69.0 (63.0-75.0) years. Median prostate volume was 65.0 (46.3-82.0) ml. Median follow-up was 31 (25-75) months. Thirty patients (2.99%) developed bladder neck stenosis [median time after surgery: 15 (11-17.75) months], 50 patients (4.98%) urethral stenosis [median time after surgery: 9 (7-11) months]. Men with bladder neck and urethral stenosis had significantly smaller prostate volume (median volume 43.5 ml vs. 66.0 ml, p = 0.008, and 52.0 ml vs. 66.0 ml, p = 0.009, respectively). At multivariable analysis, short surgical time predicted for bladder neck stenosis (OR 0.973; 95% CI 0.957-0.994, p = 0.002), and re-catheterization (OR 3.956; 95% CI 1.867-8.382, p < 0.001) for urethral stenosis, whereas prostate volume was significantly associated with a lower incidence of US (OR 0.984, 95% CI 0.972-0.998, p = 0.03).

Comparison between thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75 years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Urologists may hesitate to offer transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) because of increased morbidity in elderly patients. AIMS: We aimed to compare data on postoperative outcomes of elderly men undergoing bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) as compared to thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Differences between interventions were estimated using propensity scores (PS) to adjust for different patients characteristics. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2020, 275 men were included in the analysis. Propensity score retrieved 65 patients in each group. Median age was 78 (4) years in B-TURP group and 78 (6) in ThuVEP group. Median prostate volume was 63 (35) ml and 54 (24) ml in B-TURP group and ThuVEP group, respectively. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in ThuVEP group (p = 0.006). Median operation time, catheterization time, and hospital stay were similar in both groups (55 min, 2 and 3 days). Overall, 84.6% of men had no complications, with no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.234). Only one patient in B-TURP group experienced a Clavien grade IIIb complication. By 1 year, there were a statistically significant differences in International Prostate Symptom Score (p = 0.000) in favor of B-TURP group and in maximal urine flow rate (p = 0.000) in favor of ThuVEP group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures showed excellent functional improvements one year after surgery with a low rate of major complications in men aged ≥ 75 years with small-to-medium sized prostates.

Fluid overload syndrome: A potentially life-threatening complication of Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

Systemic fluid absorption frequently occurs during endoscopic surgery. When large volumes are absorbed, fluid overload is the result. The introduction of lasers allowed the use of normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) in endoscopic prostatic surgery. This led to the disappearance of the transurethral resection syndrome; however, the fluid overload of normal saline can cause the onset of several catastrophic effects. The present study aimed to evaluate the incidence, sign and symptoms severity of fluid overload in a large series of men who underwent Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. Between December 2014 and February 2020, 633 men underwent the procedure. Seven patients (1.1%) had symptomatic fluid overload. Two patients developed severe pulmonary oedema, which required oral intubation and admission to the intensive care unit. Two patients required delayed morcellation. The analysis of our series highlighted that old age, large prostate volume, prolonged operative time and prostatic capsular perforation influenced the onset of fluid overload syndrome. Urologists should be aware that fluid overload might be a potentially life-threatening condition and should be early recognised. Surgery should be interrupted as soon as it occurs to avoid severe pulmonary oedema.

Are Outcomes of Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Different in Men Aged 75 and Over? A Propensity Score Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) in men aged ≥75 years compared to youngers. Traditional surgery has increased and significant morbidity in older men. Lasers have been introduced as an alternative approach to overcome the morbidity of traditional surgery. MATERIAL: We retrospectively evaluated 412 men who underwent en bloc ThuLEP. Inclusion criteria were lower urinary tract symptoms refractory to medical therapy, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤15 mL/s, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥8 and absolute indications for surgery. Prostate volume, prostate specific antigen, IPSS, and Qmax, antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy, ASA score, operation time, length of catheterization, discharge day, early complications, and reoperations were gathered. Differences between groups were estimated using propensity scores, by fitting a stepwise logistic regression model with age group as the dependent variable. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients were aged ≥75 years (Group 2). Mean age was 65.6 ± 6.0 years in Group 1 and 79 ± 3.7 years in Group 2. Propensity scores retrieved 206 patients. Median operation, catheterization time, and hospital stay were similar in both groups (55 minutes, 2 and 3 days). Overall, 85.9% of men had no complications, with no differences between the groups (82.5% in Group 1 and 89.3% in Group 2). The incidence of Clavien grade III-IV complications was comparable (3.8% in Group 1, 1% in Group 2). By 1 year, there were no statistically significant differences in IPSS, Qmax, QoL, or reoperation rate between the groups. CONCLUSION: En bloc ThuLEP is a safe and effective treatment even in men aged ≥75 years old.

Comparison Between Thulium Laser VapoEnucleation and GreenLight Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate in Real-Life Setting: Propensity Score Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in daily practice efficacy and safety of standard 180-Watt GreenLight laser photoselective vaporization (PVP) and Thulium laser Vaporesection of the prostate (ThuVEP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All men were evaluated with prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, International Prostate Symptom Score, and maximum urinary flow. Patient global impression of improvement was evaluated with patient global impression of improvement scale for 6 months. Antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy, operation time, 24-hour hemoglobin drop , length of catheterization, discharge day, early complications, and reoperation after 30 days were gathered. Differences between interventions were estimated using propensity scores to adjust for different patients characteristics. The propensity scores were estimated by fitting a stepwise logistic regression model with intervention type as the dependent variable and all the covariates. RESULTS: Five hundred five men underwent the surgical procedures (291 PVP and 214 ThuVEP). Mean age was 69.6 years. Mean prostate volume was 54 mL. Median operation time was 55 minutes. Median catheterization time was 2 days in both series. After matching, the postoperative stay was similar in both groups (2 days). Hemoglobin drop for 24 hours was statistically significantly lower in PVP (-0.5 vs -0.8 g/dL, P .002). Most of the complications were mild-to-moderate and comparable among groups. Δ Maximum urinary flow was similar 6-month after surgery before and after matching, whereas PVP group had a better improvement 12-month after surgery. 96.4% of all patients had an improvement of their symptoms, with no difference between groups, before and after matching. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that PVP and ThuVEP are similar in term of complications and outcomes, with high patients' satisfaction.

Oncological safety and quality of life in men undergoing simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder tumor and prostate: results from a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To assess oncological safety and quality of life (QL) of men undergoing simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Ninety-five men with a new diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC) and symptomatic BPH were randomized to receive TURBT + tamsulosin (Group 1) or TURBT + TURP (Group 2). Inclusion criteria were age ≤ 75 years, first diagnosis of BC up to 4 cm, and prostate volume ≤ 80 ml. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with digital rectal examination, PSA, maximal urine flow rate (Qmax), and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). IPSS and Qmax were repeated at 1-year follow-up. QL was evaluated at 1 year using a modified version of the self-report bladder cancer subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-five men completed the study (43 in Group 1 and 42 in Group 2). Adjuvant instillation therapy was given to 26 patients in Group 1 and to 27 in Group 2. Average time to the first recurrence was 16.64 months in Group 1 and 17.7 in Group 2. Total recurrences were 27 in Group 1 and 22 in Group 2. Bladder neck/prostatic urethra recurrences were 9 in Group 1 vs. 8 in Group 2. QL, IPSS, and Qmax 12 months after surgery were better in Group 2. CONCLUSION: Concomitant TURBT and TURP appear to be oncologically safe procedures in terms of total and prostatic urethra recurrence, and improve QL in men with BC who require surgery for symptomatic BPH.