[Evolution of the social autonomy scale (EAS) in schizophrenic patients depending on their management]. / Évolution de l'autonomie sociale chez des patients schizophrènes selon les prises en charge. L'étude ESPASS.

It is becoming clear to clinicians that functional prognosis is the issue that should be guiding their choice of therapeutic strategy offered to people with schizophrenic disorders. An individual's degree of social autonomy is one of the principal factors determining functional prognosis, and it has become essential to identify the variables that influence it. The ESPASS survey was set up to follow a cohort of 6000 schizophrenic patients in a naturalistic setting, and was conducted over six months by 1170 psychiatrists. Patients were required to meet DSM-IV TR criteria for schizophrenia, with the exception of those suffering from an acute psychotic episode, and to either need a change in their antipsychotic treatment or its initiation. Data collected included patients' sociodemographical characteristics, types of treatment (pharmacological and non-pharmacological), illness characteristics (as determined by the DSM-IV TR criteria), degree of social autonomy (EAS), effectiveness (IAQ scale), overall severity of the illness (CGI - S scale) and patient satisfaction with medical treatment (PASAP self-questionnaire). Concerning the non-pharmacological aspects of treatment that offer patients programmes to increase their autonomy, the survey made it possible to collect data describing real practices and to measure the actual availability of rehabilitation services. It has been verified that the sample of psychiatrists included in this survey, as well as the schizophrenic patients under evaluation, were representative of the French psychiatrist and patient populations. Most importantly, the survey made it possible to objectively evaluate the healthcare services available in France. It seems that the vast majority of public-service psychiatrists have access to hospital and ambulatory facilities for treatment (medical-psychological centers, day-care hospitals and rest centers), as well as access to facilities providing simulated real-life activities. Psychiatrists who are private practitioners have less access to such arrangements for their patients. The vast majority of psychiatrists in both categories are unable to offer their patients active rehabilitation techniques: training in social skills (25%), cognitive remediation (16%), cognitive-behavioral therapies (20%), even though psychoeducation is quite widespread (44%). However, the survey demonstrated that the actual use of these methods was much lower still (2%, 1% and 2%, respectively), although the use of alternative facilities to hospitalization was quite high (day-care hospitals 9%, rest-centers 8%). In total, at the end of the study, the proportion of patients benefiting from some kind of programme to increase their level of autonomy was 41%. These results have demonstrated a link between the evolution of patients' clinical symptoms and their social autonomy. Within the findings, the items that varied most were patient's level of personal care and relations with others, whereas the ability to manage resources seems difficult to influence. Moreover, the results have shown that better development of social autonomy is significantly correlated with the prescription of second-generation antipsychotics. Regarding non-pharmacological treatment, better development of social autonomy is significantly correlated with setting up programmes to achieve this objective, including the use of active rehabilitation techniques. Overall, the survey confirmed the results of earlier work to validate the scale of social autonomy (EAS), and confirmed the robustness of its objective measurements.

[Management of patients with acute manic or mixed episodes and outcome at three months]. / Modalités de prise en charge de l'accès maniaque ou mixte aigu et évolution à trois mois.

METHODS: EMBLEM is a prospective, multicenter observational study on the management of patients with a manic or mixed episode in routine clinical practice (total of 3566 subjects included in 14 European countries). The study consisted of a 12-week acute phase and a 24-month maintenance phase. Subjects were included if they initiated or changed oral medication, according to the decision of the treating psychiatrist, with antipsychotics, anticonvulsants and / or lithium, for the treatment of a manic or mixed episode. The present report describes the acute phase outcomes of the French subgroup. RESULTS: Between December 2002 and June 2004, 126 investigators included a total of 795 subjects as in- or outpatients (450 women, 320 men, mean age: 45.6 years). The episode was most often recurrent (74.7 %) and patients were suffering from either a manic (65.8 %) or a mixed episode (34.2 % vs. EMBLEM Europe, 24 %). The intensity of manic symptoms was elevated (YMRS mean total score: 26.6) and functional impairment of the individuals was high, with 41.9 % experiencing moderate to severe work impairment and 23.6 % being unable to work. The prevalence of suicide attempts was 35.8 % (lifelong), close to the prevalence in the other French cohort EPIMAN (32 %). Abuse / dependence on alcohol and cannabis were present in 10.2 % and 11.1 % of subjects, respectively. At entry, 37.4 % were receiving monotherapy while 27.3 % received a combined therapy. All patients received treatment for their manic / mixed episode, either in combination (59.2 %) or in monotherapy (40.8 %). Atypical antipsychotics were more often prescribed in association (34.0 % of subjects) than in monotherapy (21.1 %). In patients treated in monotherapy, atypical antipsychotics were the most often prescribed drug (51.9 %). Results showed an improvement within both monotherapy and combination therapy in effectiveness measures at week 12. After 12 weeks, 31.3 % were considered recovered and 67.9 % did not relapse. These results confirm current data on co-morbidities and give information on treatment for bipolar patients at three months of follow-up. The long-term evaluation of the French EMBLEM cohort - 12, 24 months and up to five years - is presently ongoing.