ABSTRACT
Introduction: Chronic migraine headaches (MH) are a principal cause of disability worldwide. This study evaluated and compared functional outcomes after peripheral trigger point deactivation surgery or botulinum neurotoxin A (BTA) treatment in patients with MH. Methods: A long-term, multicenter, and prospective study was performed. Patients with chronic migraine were recruited at the Ohio State University and Massachusetts General Hospital and included in each treatment group according to their preference (BTA or surgery). Assessment tools including the Migraine Headache Index (MHI), Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire (MIDAS) total, MIDAS A, MIDAS B, Migraine Work and Productivity Loss Questionnaire-question 7 (MWPLQ7), and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Patients were evaluated prior to treatment and at 1, 2, and 2.5 years after treatment. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in the study (surgery=33, BTA=11). Patients treated surgically showed statistically significant improvement in headache intensity as measured on MIDAS B (p = 0.0464) and reduced disability as measured on MWPLQ7 (p = 0.0120) compared to those treated with BTA injection. No statistical difference between groups was found for the remaining functional outcomes. Mean scores significantly improved over time independently of treatment for MHI, MIDAS total, MIDAS A, MIDAS B, and MWPLQ 7 (p<0.05). However, no difference in mean scores over time was observed for MSQ. Conclusions: Headache surgery and targeted BTA injections are both effective means of addressing peripheral trigger sites causing headache pain. However, lower pain intensity and work-related disabilities were found in the surgical group.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has shown promise in applications ranging from peripheral nerve regeneration to therapeutic organ stimulation, clinical implementation has been impeded by various technological limitations, including surgical placement, lead migration, and atraumatic removal. METHODS: We describe the design and validation of a platform technology for nerve regeneration and interfacing: adaptive, conductive, and electrotherapeutic scaffolds (ACESs). ACESs are comprised of an alginate/poly-acrylamide interpenetrating network hydrogel optimized for both open surgical and minimally invasive percutaneous approaches. FINDINGS: In a rodent model of sciatic nerve repair, ACESs significantly improved motor and sensory recovery (p < 0.05), increased muscle mass (p < 0.05), and increased axonogenesis (p < 0.05). Triggered dissolution of ACESs enabled atraumatic, percutaneous removal of leads at forces significantly lower than controls (p < 0.05). In a porcine model, ultrasound-guided percutaneous placement of leads with an injectable ACES near the femoral and cervical vagus nerves facilitated stimulus conduction at significantly greater lengths than saline controls (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, ACESs facilitated lead placement, stabilization, stimulation, and atraumatic removal, enabling therapeutic PNS as demonstrated in small- and large-animal models. FUNDING: This work was supported by K. Lisa Yang Center for Bionics at MIT.