Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Respir Med ; 103(6): 902-6, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19121573

ABSTRACT

Acute cough due to viral upper respiratory tract infection (URI) is the most common form of cough and accounts for tremendous expenditure on prescription and non-prescription cough products worldwide. However, few agents have been shown in properly conducted clinical trials to be effective for cough due to URI. The present study evaluated the effect of benzonatate 200mg (B), guaifenesin 600 mg (G), their combination (B+G), and placebo (P) on capsaicin-induced cough in 30 adult nonsmokers with acute URI. On 3 separate days within a 7-day period, 1h after ingesting randomly assigned study drug in a double-blind fashion, subjects underwent capsaicin cough challenge testing, which involved inhalation of incremental doubling concentrations of capsaicin until the concentration of capsaicin inducing 5 or more coughs (C(5)) was attained. Each subject received 3 of 4 possible study drugs. G (p=0.01) but not B (p=NS) inhibited cough-reflex sensitivity (log C(5)) relative to P. The combination of B+G suppressed capsaicin-induced cough to a greater degree than B alone (p<0.001) or G alone (p=0.008). The mechanism by which the combination of B+G causes a potentiation of antitussive effect remains to be elucidated. Our results suggest that B+G may be an effective therapy for acute cough due to the common cold (URI).


Subject(s)
Antitussive Agents/therapeutic use , Butylamines/therapeutic use , Cough/drug therapy , Guaifenesin/therapeutic use , Administration, Inhalation , Administration, Oral , Adult , Capsaicin , Common Cold/complications , Cough/chemically induced , Cough/virology , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reflex/drug effects , Sensory System Agents
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 38(10): 1367-71, 2004 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15156472

ABSTRACT

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the ability of Echinacea purpurea to prevent infection with rhinovirus type 39 (RV-39). Forty-eight previously healthy adults received echinacea or placebo, 2.5 mL 3 times per day, for 7 days before and 7 days after intranasal inoculation with RV-39. Symptoms were assessed to evaluate clinical illness. Viral culture and serologic studies were performed to evaluate the presence of rhinovirus infection. A total of 92% of echinacea recipients and 95% of placebo recipients were infected. Colds developed in 58% of echinacea recipients and 82% of placebo recipients (P=.114, by Fisher's exact test). Administration of echinacea before and after exposure to rhinovirus did not decrease the rate of infection; however, because of the small sample size, statistical hypothesis testing had relatively poor power to detect statistically significant differences in the frequency and severity of illness.


Subject(s)
Common Cold/prevention & control , Echinacea/chemistry , Phytotherapy , Rhinovirus , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Common Cold/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Drug Tolerance , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Plants, Medicinal , Random Allocation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL