The Management of a Comprehensive Cancer Center during the First Six Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the South of France: Lessons from the Paoli-Calmettes Institute's Experience.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, it was rapidly established that cancer patients have an increased risk of developing severe forms of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) due to a backlog of cancer diagnostics and immunosuppressive treatments. Cancer centers had to quickly adapt to continue cancer therapies despite the high infection risks and major disruptions in the French healthcare system. We described and analyzed the impact of the pandemic in our institution: management adjustments, COVID-19 infection rates in patients and staff, and impacts on clinical activities and finances during the first wave of the pandemic from March to September 2020. We also compared the results to the clinical activity data from preceding periods. A crisis unit was rapidly created that met 27 times over 66 days, generating numerous changes in hospital protocol. While our area was devastated by the pandemic, the infection rate of our staff and patients remained low (less than 1.5% of all employees). However, the lockdown period was accompanied with a reduction of most clinical activities, leading to decreases of 43%, 36%, 36%, 1%, and 10% in surgery, endoscopy, radiotherapy, and in- and out-patient chemotherapy sessions, respectively, with substantial financial loss. Our report highlights the need for the rapid creation, implementation, and adaptation of new protocols during a pandemic's evolution to prevent disease transmission. Lessons from this situation should provide motivation to better prepare for/limit the dismantling of cancer therapies that can dramatically impact patient care and have deleterious consequences on an institution's financial situation.

Borderline or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A single center experience on the FOLFIRINOX induction regimen.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the impact of FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant therapy on patients with non-metastatic borderline/locally advanced (BL/LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), in current practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2010 to 2017, 258 patients with BL/LA PDAC from a single high-volume institution received FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: The 258 patients received a median number of 6 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (range, 3-16); 98 (38%) patients underwent curative surgery, and 160 (62%) continued medical treatment. A venous resection was performed in 57 patients (58%), and an arterial resection in 12 (12%). The postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 6.1% and 8.2%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 57 patients (59%). The median overall survival (OS) in patients who did (n = 98) or did not (n = 160) undergo surgical resection were 39 months and 19 months, respectively (P < 0.001). In resected patients, the ASA 3 score (P < 0.01), venous resection (P < 0.01), hemorrhage (P < 0.01), and R1 margin status (P = 0.03) were found to negatively influence the OS. The median OS was significantly higher in patients who did not require a venous resection (not reached vs. 26.5 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX provided a survival benefit in BL/LA PDAC patients, particularly in those who did not ultimately require venous resection.

Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Elderly Patients over 75 Years of Age: A Retrospective Series of 129 Patients.

PURPOSE: To better know the presentation and outcome of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients above 75 years of age. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with a pancreatic adenocarcinoma seen in the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Marseille between January 2002 and January 2012 was used. RESULTS: During these 10 years, 129 patients older than 75 years of age were seen, 61 females and 68 males, median age 78. At diagnosis, the tumor was metastatic in 45%. First line treatments were: surgical resection in 22 cases, radio-chemotherapy in 20 cases (1 operated on later), systemic chemotherapy in 59 cases, and best supportive care alone in 28 cases. Resection was possible in 19 cases and was R0 in 17; post-operative mortality was 0%, and half received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 43 months with a 2-year overall survival of 64%. For locally advanced tumor, 16 received best supportive care and 33 a specific treatment (20 cases of radio-chemotherapy). Median overall survival was 9.1 months and 2-year overall, survival was 6.1%. Among the 58 metastatic patients, 79% received systemic chemotherapy (most by gemcitabine); tolerance was correct in half. Median overall survival was 4.7 months, with a 2-year overall survival of 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is feasible and safe in elderly patients with good outcomes. In advanced and metastatic patients, the outcome is poor despite a correct tolerance of systemic chemotherapy. Randomized trials specially designed for this population are urgently needed.

[Rectal cancer Information dedicated to cancer patients and relatives]. / Comprendre le cancer du rectum Information à l'usage des personnes malades et de leurs proches.

In response to the evolution of the information-seeking behaviour of patients and concerns from health professionals regarding cancer patient information, the French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) introduced, in 1998, an information and education program dedicated to patients and relatives, the SOR SAVOIR PATIENT program. The methodology of this program adheres to established quality criteria regarding the elaboration of patient information. Cancer patient information, developed in this program, is based on clinical practice guidelines produced by the FNCLCC and the twenty French regional cancer centres, the National League against Cancer, The National Cancer Institute, the French Hospital Federation, the National Oncology Federation of Regional and University Hospitals, the French Oncology Federation of General Hospitals, many learned societies, as well as an active participation of patients, former patients and caregivers. The handbook SOR SAVOIR PATIENT Understanding rectal cancer is an adapted version of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG) Standards, Options and Recommendations for rectal cancer. It is meant to provide a basis for the explanation of the disease and treatments and to facilitate discussions with the healthcare team. It is available from the FNCLCC (101, rue de Tolbiac, 75013 Paris, Tel. (0033) 1 44 23 04 68, www.fnclcc.fr). This document has been validated at the end of 2004 and published in 2005. SOR SAVOIR PATIENT guides are systematically updated when new research becomes available. Information leaflets, extracted from the handbook SOR SAVOIR PATIENT Understanding rectal cancer and published in this edition of the Bulletin du cancer, allow patients to better understand colonoscopy and colostomy, which represent an important patient information need. These articles are meant to inform patients and relatives about the disease and its treatments. It also offers health professionals a synthetic evidence-based patient information source which facilitates discussions with the patient.

Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: impact of complete cytoreductive surgery and difficulties in conducting randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a frequent and very lethal event. However, cure may be possible with maximal cytoreductive surgery associated with early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). METHODS: Between 1996 and 2000, we conducted a two-center prospective randomized trial comparing EPIC plus systemic chemotherapy with systemic chemotherapy alone, both after complete cytoreductive surgery of colorectal PC. Only 35 patients could be included among the 90 who were theoretically required, mainly because of patient dissatisfaction with the inclusion criteria. For this reason, the trial was stopped prematurely. RESULTS: Analysis of these 35 patients showed that complete resection of PC resulted in a 2-year survival rate of 60%-far above the classic 10% survival rate among patients with colorectal PC treated with systemic chemotherapy and symptomatic surgery. In this small series, EPIC did not demonstrate any advantage for survival. CONCLUSIONS: This supports the use of complete cytoreductive surgery in selected patients and calls for a prospective randomized trial comparing adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia after complete resection.