Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Children (Basel) ; 10(2)2023 Jan 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36832332

ABSTRACT

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) represents a chronic, autoimmune, rheumatic musculoskeletal disease with a diagnosis before 16 years of age. Chronic arthritis is a common manifestation in all JIA subtypes. The nature of JIA, in combination to its therapy often results in the development of nutrition-, gastrointestinal (GI)- or metabolic-related issues. The most-common therapy-related nutritional issues involve methotrexate (MTX) and glucocorticosteroids (GCC) adverse events. MTX is a folic acid antagonist, thus supplementation with folic acid in required for improving GI side effects and correcting low serum levels. On the other hand, long-term GCC administration is often associated with hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and growth delay. This relationship is further aggravated when more joints are affected and greater doses of GCC are being administered. Apart from stature, body mass index z-scores are also suboptimal in JIA. Other signs of malnutrition include decreased phase angle and muscle mass, especially among patients with polyarthritis JIA. Evidence also points to the existence of an inverse relationship between disease activity and overweight/obesity. Specific dietary patterns, including the anti-inflammatory diet, might confer improvements in selected JIA outcomes, but the level of available research is yet insufficient to draw safe conclusions. The majority of patients exhibit suboptimal vitamin D status; hence, supplementation is recommended. Collectively, the evidence indicates that, due to the age of onset and the complexity of the disease, along with its pharmacotherapy, children with JIA are prone to the development of several nutritional problems, warranting expert monitoring. Vitamin deficiencies, oral and GI-problems limiting dietary intake, faltering growth, overweight and obesity, physical inactivity, or impaired bone health are among the many nutritional issues in JIA requiring dietitian support.

2.
Nutrients ; 14(24)2022 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36558433

ABSTRACT

During pregnancy, women tend to improve their lifestyle habits and refine their dietary intake. Quite often, however, these dietary improvements take an unhealthy turn, with orthorexia nervosa (ON) practices being apparent. The aim of the present pilot cross-sectional study was to assess the prevalence of ON tendencies and the incidence of pica and record diet practices in a sample of pregnant women. A total of 157 pregnant women were recruited through private practice gynecologists during the first months of 2021. Nutrition-related practices were recorded, orthorexic tendencies were assessed using the translated and culturally adapted Greek version of the ORTO-15 questionnaire, pica practices were evaluated with a binary question and nausea and emesis during pregnancy (NVP) was evaluated using the translated modified Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis and Nausea (mPUQE). Only two women reported pica tendencies, with ice and snow being the consumed items. The majority (61.1%) of women reported improving their diet since conception was achieved. Folic acid and iron oral nutrient supplements (ONS) were reportedly consumed by the majority of participants (87.9% and 72.6%, respectively) and 9.6% reported using herbal medicine products. The ORTO-15 score was reduced with tertiary education attainment, ART conception, being in the third trimester of pregnancy, consumption of folic acid and MV supplements and was only increased among women who were at their first pregnancy. The majority of participants experienced severe NVP and the remaining experienced moderate NVP. NVP was associated with lower hemoglobin levels, lack of supplementary iron intake, avoidance of gluten-containing foods, as well as with increased gestational weight gain. The results highlight the need to screen pregnant women for disturbed eating behaviors and nutrition-related problems, in order to ensure a healthy pregnancy outcome.


Subject(s)
Morning Sickness , Pregnancy Complications , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Pregnant Women , Pilot Projects , Pica/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Vomiting , Nausea/epidemiology , Folic Acid , Iron
3.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; : 1-15, 2022 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35900212

ABSTRACT

Theoretical evidence and previous studies suggest that oralnutrient supplementation (ONS) with n-3 fatty acids for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has the potential to lower disease activity indicators and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) uptake. A systematic search was conducted on five databases/registries from inception until May 23, 2021 with the aim to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials comparing n-3 supplements to placebo on disease-specific outcomes. A total of 23 studies matched the criteria (PROSPERO: CRD42019137041). Pooled analyses revealed that n-3 ONS provided a small effect in reducing pain [standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.16, 95% confidence intervals (CI): -0.40 to 0.09], and tender (SMD: -0.20, 95% CI: -0.46 to 0.05) and swollen joint count (SMD: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.28 to 0.07). In sensitivity analyses, there was a small effect in the reduction of NSAIDs intake (SMD: -0.22, 95% CI: -0.90 to 0.46), and c-reactive protein was reduced only by 0.21 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.75 to 0.33). Similar findings were observed regarding other objective/subjective outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was mostly of "very low/low" quality. Overall, n-3 ONS in RA might have a limited clinical benefit. Previous findings suggesting a reduction in NSAID intake may have been biased from the inadequate blinding of interventions.

4.
Nutrients ; 13(12)2021 11 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34959826

ABSTRACT

Rheumatic diseases (RDs) are often complicated by chronic symptoms and frequent side-effects associated with their treatment. Saffron, a spice derived from the Crocus sativus L. flower, is a popular complementary and alternative medicine among patients with RDs. The present systematic review aimed to summarize the available evidence regarding the efficacy of supplementation with saffron on disease outcomes and comorbidities in patients with RD diagnoses. PubMed, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov and the grey literature were searched until October 2021, and relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were screened for eligibility using Rayyan. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias-2.0 (RoB) tool. A synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) was performed by vote counting and an effect direction plot was created. Out of 125 reports, seven fulfilled the eligibility criteria belonging to five RCTs and were included in the SWiM. The RCTs involved patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia, and evaluated outcomes related to pain, disease activity, depression, immune response, inflammation, oxidative stress, health, fatigue and functional ability. The majority of trials demonstrated some concerns regarding overall bias. Moreover, the majority of trialists failed to adhere to the formula elaborations suggested by the CONSORT statement for RCTs incorporating herbal medicine interventions. Standardization of herbal medicine confirms its identity, purity and quality; however, the majority of trials failed to adhere to these guidelines. Due to the great heterogeneity and the lack of important information regarding the standardization and content of herbal interventions, it appears that the evidence is not enough to secure a direction of effect for any of the examined outcomes.


Subject(s)
Crocus , Dietary Supplements , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Rheumatic Diseases/therapy , Bias , Herbal Medicine/standards , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards
5.
Metabol Open ; 11: 100109, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34337377

ABSTRACT

Adhesive transdermal delivery devices (patches) are the latest advancement in the delivery of micronutrients. A common challenge in this mode of delivery includes surpassing the physical barrier of the skin, while the use of microneedle (MN) arrays, or pretreatment of the skin with MNs can be used for a more successful outcome. Limited evidence from human non-randomized trials point to a sub-optimal delivery of iron through skin patches, although no MNs were used in those trials. Moreover, the use of patches proved inefficient in reducing the prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies in post-bariatric surgery patients. The delivery of minerals was tested in animals using reservoir-type patches, gel/foam patches, MNs and iontophoresis. Results from these studies indicate a possible interplay between the dietary manipulation of mineral intake and the trandermal delivery through patches, as reduced, or regular dietary intake seems to increase absorption of the delivered mineral. Moreover, intervention duration could be an additional factor affecting absorption. Possible adverse events from animal studies include redness or decolorization of skin. In vitro and ex vivo studies revealed an increase in vitamin K, vitamin D and iron delivery, however a variety of methodological discrepancies are apparent in these studies, including the models used, the length of the MNs, the duration of application, temperature control and total micronutrient load in the patches. Data indicate that pre-treating the skin with MNs might enhance delivery; however, a source of variability in the observed effectiveness might include the different molecular weights of the nutrients used, skin factors, the ideal tip radius and MN wall thickness. Non-human studies indicate a potential benefit in combining MN with iontophoresis. Presently, the transdermal delivery seems promising with regard to nutritional supplementation, however limited evidence exists for its efficacy in humans. Future research should aim to control for both intervention duration, possible deficiency status and for the dietary intake of participants.

6.
Nutrients ; 12(11)2020 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33203138

ABSTRACT

Patient adherence to guidelines is important for improved outcomes and prognosis. Nevertheless, many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) do not comply with the recommendations regarding medication, physical activity, diet or self-care. The present cross-sectional study aimed to assess the level of adherence to the dietary recommendations issued by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) among patients with T2DM in Komotini, Greece. A total of 162 adults with T2DM (64.7 ± 10.6 years old), of which 41.4% were men, were recruited from the Sismanoglio Hospital and participated in the study. The level of adherence to individual recommendations issued by the ADA was assessed using yes/no questions. The overall adherence rate to the guidelines was low (41.2%). According to the multivariable analysis, age and medication therapy were identified as contributors to the compliance rate. No differences were noted in the total compliance rate between patients of different religious denominations (Muslims/Christians). Patients on oral antidiabetic agents (OAA) were more adherent compared with those on insulin therapy. A mere 3.7% of the participants had received nutrition education by a registered dietitian, 9.9% were following an individualized diet plan to improve glycemia, and 3.1% had set specific energy goals to reduce body weight. These findings are indicative of the need for the delivery of improved nutrition education.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diet therapy , Nutrition Policy , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic , Aged , Body Weight , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Female , Greece , Health Education , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Societies, Medical
7.
Nutrients ; 12(10)2020 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33003518

ABSTRACT

The quest for dietary patterns and supplements efficient in down-regulating prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations among men with prostate cancer (PCa) or increased PCa risk has been long. Several antioxidants, including lycopene, selenium, curcumin, coenzyme Q10, phytoestrogens (including isoflavones and flavonoids), green tea catechins, cernitin, vitamins (C, E, D) and multivitamins, medicinal mushrooms (Ganoderma lucidum), fruit extracts (saw palmetto, cranberries, pomegranate), walnuts and fatty acids, as well as combined supplementations of all, have been examined in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in humans, on the primary, secondary, and tertiary PCa prevention level. Despite the plethora of trials and the variety of examined interventions, the evidence supporting the efficacy of most dietary factors appears inadequate to recommend their use.


Subject(s)
Diet/methods , Dietary Supplements , Phytotherapy/methods , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Catechin/therapeutic use , Diet/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phytoestrogens/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vitamins/therapeutic use
8.
Nutrients ; 12(3)2020 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32143526

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Vitamin D deficiency is an important public health concern and supplementation is common for this deficiency. Many different modes of delivering supplementation have been proposed in order to enhance absorption and utilization. The present review compared the efficacy of vitamin D3 buccal spray against other forms of supplementation delivery. (2) Methods: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42019136146). Medline/PubMed, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from their inception until September 2019, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare vitamin D3 delivery via sublingual spray against other delivery methods. Eligible RCTs involved humans, of any age and health status, published in any language that evaluated changes in plasma 25(OH)D concentrations. Three reviewers independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias (RoB) and the quality of the trials. (3) Results: Out of 9759 RCTs, four matched the predefined criteria. Intervention duration ranged from 30 days to 3 months whereas vitamin D3 dosage ranged between 800 and 3000 IU/day. One RCT advocated for the superiority of buccal spray in increasing plasma 25(OH)D concentrations, although several limitations were recorded in that trial. The rest failed to report differences in post-intervention 25(OH)D concentrations between delivery methods. Considerable clinical heterogeneity was observed due to study design, intervention duration and dosage, assays and labs used to perform the assays, population age and health status, not allowing for synthesis of the results. (4) Conclusions: Based on the available evidence, delivery of vitamin D3 via buccal spray does not appear superior to the other modes of delivery. Future RCTs avoiding the existing methodological shortcomings are warranted.


Subject(s)
Cholecalciferol/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Vitamin D Deficiency/drug therapy , Drug Administration Routes , Female , Humans , Male , Oral Sprays , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin D Deficiency/blood
9.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 119(8): 1320-1339, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31201104

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical nutrition therapy is the cornerstone of gestational diabetes mellitus treatment. However, guidelines often present contradictory guidance to health care practitioners. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and critically appraise medical nutrition therapy guidelines for treating patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: We searched Medline, the Cochrane Library, Guidelines International Network, and Google Scholar to retrieve clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for medical nutrition therapy in gestational diabetes mellitus from professional or governmental organizations, published in English, between January 1, 2007, and November 24, 2018. CPGs were reviewed and appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation II instrument. RESULTS: Of 1,286 retrieved articles, 21 CPGs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. CPGs of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Diabetes Canada, and Malaysia Health Technology Assessment Section received the greatest overall scores and the highest scores concerning rigor of recommendations development. Many CPGs failed to involve multidisciplinary teams in their development, including patients, and often, dietitians. Applicability of the recommendations was low, lacking facilitators and tools to enhance implementation. Many CPGs demonstrated low editorial independence by failing to disclose funding and competing interests. More medical nutrition therapy recommendations were incorporated in the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and Malaysia Health Technology Assessment Section CPGs. The Malaysia Health Technology Assessment Section, Diabetes Canada, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, and Endocrine Society guidelines were recommended by the review panel herein without modifications. Overall, the CPGs suggested the consumption of adequate protein and the selection of foods with low glycemic index, divided into three main meals and two to four snacks. Weight gain recommendations were mostly based on the Institute of Medicine body mass index thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: With few exceptions, the main developmental limitations of the appraised CPGs involved low rigor of recommendations development, lack of multidisciplinary stakeholder involvement, low applicability, and inadequate editorial independence. This indicates a need for developing more clear, unbiased, practical, and evidence-based CPGs.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/diet therapy , Nutrition Policy , Nutrition Therapy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prenatal Care/standards , Female , Humans , Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Pregnancy
10.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 69(1): 120-125, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31058775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Despite the fact that pediatric pancreatitis is an uncommon disease, its prevalence has increased in recent years. Nevertheless, until 4 years ago, the lack of nutritional guidelines for pediatric pancreatitis was evident, with all recommendations being based on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for adults. The aim of the present study was to review and critically appraise guidelines for the medical nutrition therapy (MNT) of pediatric pancreatitis. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), the International Guidelines Network, BMJ best practice, and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network to identify CPGs on the MNT of pediatric pancreatitis. The validated AGREE II tool was used for guidelines appraisal by a team of 3 independent multidisciplinary reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 4 CPGs were retrieved with pediatric pancreatitis MNT information. Out of the 4 advising bodies in total, the joint society paper published by the ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN received the highest score in almost all domains, whereas the Belgian consensus obtained the lowest score in all domains but stakeholder involvement, and was not recommended by 2 out of 3 reviewers. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric pancreatitis guidelines appear heterogenous in quality, rigour, and transparency. Our study points out existing gaps and biases in the CPGs, and delineates the need for improving the domains identified as being of low-quality.


Subject(s)
Pancreatitis/diet therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Child , Humans , Nutrition Therapy/methods
11.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 43(4): 490-496, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30320409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe burns are associated with a plethora of profound metabolic, immunologic, and physiologic responses, demanding prompt and adequate management. The objective of the present study was to review, compare, and critically appraise medical nutrition therapy guidelines for adult patients with severe burns, and produce salient points for the future update of relevant guidelines. METHODS: A total of 8 clinical practice guidelines developed by the American Burn Association (ABA), the European Burn Association (EBA), the European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN), the Midlands National Health Service, the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM)/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units and Spanish Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, the Indian Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (IAPEN), and the International Society for Burn Injury regarding medical nutrition therapy in burn patients was independently reviewed by a team of 4 multidisciplinary researchers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS: From the appraised guidelines, the SCCM/ASPEN guidelines received the greatest scoring in the majority of AGREE domains compared with ABA, EBA, and IAPEN, which obtained the lowest scores. On the other hand, the ESPEN guidelines provided the majority of information concerning nutrition support and medical nutrition therapy. CONCLUSION: Our study identified gaps in most nutrition guidelines and emphasized methodologic issues that could improve the quality of future guidelines concerning nutrition support among adult severe burn patients.


Subject(s)
Burns/therapy , Consensus , Nutrition Therapy/methods , Nutrition Therapy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Enteral Nutrition/standards , Europe , Guideline Adherence , Humans , India , MEDLINE , Parenteral Nutrition/standards , Societies, Medical , United States
12.
Nutrients ; 10(11)2018 Nov 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30424514

ABSTRACT

Curcumin has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties and has been investigated as an adjuvant therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC). The scope of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of oral curcumin administration as an adjuvant therapy of UC. MEDLINE, Cochrane/CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO-ICT Registry, EMBASE and grey literature were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was clinical remission (attainment) and the secondary outcome was clinical response (maintenance/failure). Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated with a Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) random effects model and with a beta-binomial (B-B) random effects model when zero events/cells occurred. Four RCTs met the criteria, but one was removed from the analyses due to inconsistency in protocol details. With the M-H method, treatment with curcumin was significantly superior to placebo in attaining remission in the per-protocol (PP) analysis (OR = 5.83, 95%CI = 1.24⁻27.43), but not in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (OR = 4.33, 95%CI = 0.78⁻24.00). However, with the more accurate B-B method, both analyses were insignificant (for PP OR = 4.26, 95%CI = 0.59⁻31.00, for ITT OR = 3.80, 95%CI = 0.55⁻26.28). Based on the current available evidence, oral curcumin administration does not seem superior to placebo in attaining remission in patients with UC. Future RCTs should be planned more cautiously with sufficient size and adhere to the ITT analysis in all outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Curcumin/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL