Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Metabolism ; 65(11): 1636-1645, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27733252

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), the primary omega-3 fatty acids in fish oil, have been shown to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the independent effects of EPA and DHA on lipid and apolipoprotein levels, as well as on inflammatory biomarkers of CVD risk, using doses often used in the general population. DESIGN: A blinded, randomized 6-week trial was performed in 121 healthy, normolipidemic subjects who received olive oil placebo 6g/d, EPA 600mg/d, EPA 1800mg/d, or DHA 600mg/d. The EPA was derived from genetically modified yeast. RESULTS: The subjects tolerated the supplements well with no safety issues; and the expected treatment-specific increases in plasma EPA and DHA levels were observed. Compared to placebo, the DHA group had significant decreases in postprandial triglyceride (TG) concentrations (-20%, -52.2mg/dL, P=0.03), significant increases in fasting and postprandial low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (+18.4%, 17.1mg/dL, P=0.001), with no significant changes in inflammatory biomarkers. No significant effects were observed in the EPA 600mg/d group. The high-dose EPA group had significant decreases in lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 concentrations (Lp-PLA2) (-14.1%, -21.4ng/mL, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effects of EPA 1800mg/d on CVD risk reduction may relate in part to the lowering of Lp-PLA2 without adversely affecting LDL-C. In contrast, DHA decreased postprandial TG, but raised LDL-C. Our observations indicate that these dietary fatty acids have divergent effects on cardiovascular risk markers.


Subject(s)
Cardiotonic Agents/pharmacology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Docosahexaenoic Acids/pharmacology , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/pharmacology , Apolipoproteins/blood , Apolipoproteins B/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Lipids/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Olive Oil/pharmacology , Phospholipases A2/blood , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Triglycerides/blood
2.
Curr Atheroscler Rep ; 7(6): 421-7, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16255999

ABSTRACT

Although there is consensus about restriction of dietary saturated and trans fatty acids, cholesterol, and sugars, there is debate about what the optimal total fat and carbohydrate content of the diet should be for weight loss and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk reduction. The overall evidence that dietary composition plays an important role in determining caloric intake is limited. Three recent randomized trials have indicated that low-carbohydrate diets are more effective in promoting weight loss in overweight and obese subjects over 4 to 6 months, but not over 1 year. In our own randomized trial no such differences were noted, and compliance with extreme diets was limited. Moreover little attempt has been made to control for the type of carbohydrate used in the low-fat, high-carbohydrate arms of these trials. Available evidence suggests that restriction of sugars and carbohydrates having a high glycemic index would be preferable to total carbohydrate restriction, and that an increased intake of fiber and essential fats (especially omega-3 fatty acids) is also important for overall heart disease risk reduction.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/prevention & control , Diet, Fat-Restricted , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Life Style , Lipoproteins/blood , Coronary Artery Disease/diet therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lipoproteins/analysis , Male , Prognosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Weight Loss
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL