Complement opsonization of nanoparticles: Differences between humans and preclinical species.

The complement system plays a key role in opsonization and immune clearance of engineered nanoparticles. Understanding the efficiency, inter-subject, and inter-strain differences of complement opsonization in preclinical species can help with translational nanomedicine development and improve our ability to model complement response in humans. Dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles and a wide range of non-magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle formulations are widely used in magnetic resonance imaging and as clinically approved iron supplements. Previously we found that opsonization of SPIO nanoworms (NW) with the third complement protein (C3) proceeds mostly via the alternative pathway in humans, and via the lectin pathway in mice. Here, we studied the pathway and efficiency of opsonization of 106 nm SPIO NW with C3 in different preclinical species and commonly used laboratory strains. In sera of healthy human donors (n = 6), C3 opsonization proceeded exclusively through the alternative pathway. On the other hand, the C3 opsonization in dogs (6 breeds), rats (4 strains) and mice (5 strains) sera was either partially or completely dependent on the complement Ca2+-sensitive pathways (lectin and/or classical). Specifically, C3 opsonization in sera of Long Evans rat strain, and mouse strains widely used in nanomedicine research (BALB/c, C57BL/6 J, and A/J) was only through the Ca2+-dependent pathways. Dogs and humans had the highest between-subject variability in C3 opsonization levels, while rat and mouse sera showed the lowest between-strain variability. Furthermore, using a panel of SPIO nanoparticles of different sizes and dextran coatings, we found that the level of C3 opsonization (C3 molecules per milligram Fe) in human sera was lower than in animal sera. At the same time, there was a strong predictive value of complement opsonization in dog and rat sera; nanoparticles with higher C3 deposition in animals showed higher deposition in humans, and vice versa. Notably, the opsonization decreased with decreasing size in all sera. The studies highlight the importance of the consideration of species and strains for predicting human complement responses (opsonization) towards nanomedicines.

Feraheme (Ferumoxytol) Is Recognized by Proinflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Macrophages via Scavenger Receptor Type AI/II.

Feraheme (ferumoxytol), a negatively charged, carboxymethyl dextran-coated ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (USPIO, 30 nm, -16 mV), is clinically approved as an iron supplement and is used off-label for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of macrophage-rich lesions, but the mechanism of recognition is not known. We investigated mechanisms of uptake of Feraheme by various types of macrophages in vitro and in vivo. The uptake by mouse peritoneal macrophages was not inhibited in complement-deficient serum. In contrast, the uptake of larger and less charged SPIO nanoworms (60 nm, -5 mV; 120 nm, -5 mV, respectively) was completely inhibited in complement deficient serum, which could be attributed to more C3 molecules bound per nanoparticle than Feraheme. The uptake of Feraheme in vitro was blocked by scavenger receptor (SR) inhibitor polyinosinic acid (PIA) and by antibody against scavenger receptor type A I/II (SR-AI/II). Antibodies against other SRs including MARCO, CD14, SR-BI, and CD11b had no effect on Feraheme uptake. Intraperitoneally administered PIA inhibited the peritoneal macrophage uptake of Feraheme in vivo. Nonmacrophage cells transfected with SR-AI plasmid efficiently internalized Feraheme but not noncharged ultrasmall SPIO of the same size (26 nm, -6 mV), suggesting that the anionic carboxymethyl groups of Feraheme are responsible for the SR-AI recognition. The uptake by nondifferentiated bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDM) and by BMDM differentiated into M1 (proinflammatory) and M2 (anti-inflammatory) types was efficiently inhibited by PIA and anti-SR-AI/II antibody. Interestingly, all BMDM types expressed similar levels of SR-AI/II. In conclusion, Feraheme is efficiently recognized via SR-AI/II but not via complement by different macrophage types. The recognition by the common phagocytic receptor has implications for specificity of imaging of macrophage subtypes.