Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Bone Joint J ; 103-B(10): 1571-1577, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34587805

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylactic treatments in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Using nationwide medical registries, we identified patients with a primary TKA performed in Denmark between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018 who received thromboprophylactic treatment. We examined the 90-day risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and all-cause mortality following surgery. We used a Cox regression model to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome, pairwise comparing treatment with dalteparin or dabigatran with rivaroxaban as the reference. The HRs were both computed using a multivariable and a propensity score matched analysis. RESULTS: We identified 27,736 primary TKA patients who received thromboprophylactic treatment (rivaroxaban (n = 18,846); dalteparin (n = 5,767); dabigatran (n = 1,443); tinzaparin (n = 1,372); and enoxaparin (n = 308)). In the adjusted multivariable analysis and compared with rivaroxaban, treatment with dalteparin (HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.92)) or dabigatran (HR 0.31 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.70)) was associated with a decreased risk of VTE. No statistically significant differences were observed for major bleeding or all-cause mortality. The propensity score matched analysis yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Treatment with dalteparin or dabigatran was associated with a decreased 90-day risk of VTE following primary TKA surgery compared with treatment with rivaroxaban. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(10):1571-1577.


Subject(s)
Antithrombins/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Perioperative Care/methods , Postoperative Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/mortality , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Dalteparin/therapeutic use , Denmark , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perioperative Care/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Tinzaparin/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Young Adult
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 126(4): 872-880, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33455802

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine is commonly used in local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) as pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although considered safe, no studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics of high-dose ropivacaine infiltration in simultaneous bilateral TKA. METHODS: We studied 13 patients undergoing unilateral and 15 undergoing bilateral TKA. Standard LIA technique was used with ropivacaine 0.2%, 200 ml (400 mg) injected peri-articularly in each knee. Free and total plasma concentrations of ropivacaine were measured within 24 h using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A population pharmacokinetic model was built using non-linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Peak free ropivacaine concentration was 0.030 (0.017-0.071) µg ml-1 (mean [99% confidence interval]) vs 0.095 (0.047-0.208) µg ml-1, and peak total ropivacaine concentration was 0.756 (0.065-1.222) µg ml-1vs 1.695 (0.077-3.005) µg ml-1 for unilateral and bilateral TKA, respectively. The pharmacokinetics was ascribed a one-compartment model with first-order absorption. The main identified covariates were protein binding, allometrically scaled body weight on clearance and volume, and unilateral or bilateral surgery on volume. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate the pharmacokinetics of free and total ropivacaine after unilateral and bilateral TKA. A population model was successfully built and peak free ropivacaine concentration stayed below previously proposed toxic thresholds in patients undergoing unilateral and bilateral TKA receiving LIA with high-dose ropivacaine. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04702282.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacokinetics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/metabolism , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Ropivacaine/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Prospective Studies , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage
3.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 1192: 84-94, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20392222

ABSTRACT

The effects of antiresorptive agents (e.g., alendronate [Aln], osteoprotegerin [OPG]) on bone infection are unknown. Thus, their effects on implant-associated osteomyelitis (OM) were investigated in mice using PBS (placebo), gentamycin, and etanercept (TNFR:Fc) controls. None of the drugs affected humoral immunity, angiogenesis, or chronic infection. However, the significant (P < 0.05 vs. PBS) inhibition of cortical osteolysis and decreased draining lymph node size in Aln- and OPG-treated mice was associated with a significant (P < 0.05) increase in the incidence of high-grade infections during the establishment of OM. In contrast, the high-grade infections in TNFR:Fc-treated mice were associated with immunosuppression, as evidenced by the absence of granulomas and presence of Gram(+) biofilm in the bone marrow. Collectively, these findings indicate that although antiresorptive agents do not exacerbate chronic OM, they can increase the bacterial load during early infection by decreasing lymphatic drainage and preventing the removal of necrotic bone that harbors the bacteria.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Jaw Diseases/chemically induced , Osteomyelitis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Animals , Biofilms/drug effects , Chronic Disease , Cytokines/drug effects , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , Immunity/drug effects , Incidence , Jaw Diseases/epidemiology , Jaw Diseases/immunology , Mice , Neovascularization, Physiologic/drug effects , Osteoclasts/drug effects , Osteoclasts/physiology , Osteomyelitis/complications , Osteomyelitis/epidemiology , Osteomyelitis/immunology , Osteonecrosis/epidemiology , Osteonecrosis/immunology , Staphylococcal Infections/chemically induced , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL