Sex difference in long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A propensity-matched analysis of National Health Insurance data in Republic of Korea.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the gender difference in the 5-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using an unselected population data. BACKGROUND: Sex-specific outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not consistent among studies. METHODS: A total of 48,783 patients were enrolled from a Korean nationwide cohort of PCI in year 2011. Outcomes adjusted with age and propensity for clinical characteristics were compared. Primary outcome was 5-year cumulative incidence of all-cause death. Nonfatal major adverse clinical event (MACE) consisting of revascularization, shock, or stroke was also assessed. RESULTS: In unadjusted analysis, women were older and had higher frequency of comorbidities including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes compared to men (p < .001, all). Women had higher 5-year death risk than men (21.8 vs. 17.3%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.29, 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.23-1.34). In propensity score-matched analysis (N = 28,924), women had lower 5-year death risk (20.2 vs. 26.1%, HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.78). This lower death risk in women was consistent in subgroup analyses of age, risk factors, and clinical diagnosis including angina or acute myocardial infarction (p < .05, all). CONCLUSIONS: Older age and more common comorbidities in women contributed to the apparent worse outcome after PCI in women. After adjusting these disadvantages, women had better outcome after PCI than men.

Effect of sarpogrelate and high-dose statin on the reduction of coronary spasm in vasospastic angina: A two by two factorial, pilot randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Vasospastic angina (VSA) is characterized by coronary spasm, which can be aggravated by vasoactive substances such as serotonin. Hypothesis Sarpogrelate, a selective serotonin receptor antagonist, and high-dose statin have some effects on the reduction of coronary spasm in patients with VSA. METHODS: We recruited 100 patients with angiographically confirmed VSA, and randomly assigned them into four groups: sarpogrelate with high-dose statin (Group A, n = 25), sarpogrelate with low-dose or no statin (Group B, n = 25), placebo with high-dose statin (Group C, n = 25), and placebo with low-dose or no statin (Group D, n = 25). The primary endpoint was the remission of coronary spasm on 1-year follow-up provocation test. RESULTS: The most common site of coronary spasm was left anterior descending artery (42%). Most patients (96%) took calcium channel blockers, and 46% were treated with vasodilators. Overall, 40% of patients reported no chest pain at 1 year, and 23% showed complete remission of coronary spasm on 1-year follow-up provocation test. No difference was observed in symptomatic and angiographically complete remission rate between the sarpogrelate and the placebo group. Although the apolipoprotein B level at the 1-year follow-up was significantly lower in the high-dose statin group, symptomatic and angiographic outcomes were not different according to statin intensity. Distal thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow on initial provocation test was independently associated with angiographically complete remission. CONCLUSIONS: Sarpogrelate or high-dose statin did not significantly improve the angiographic remission rate in patients with VSA. Distal TIMI flow on initial provocation test could predict the complete remission of coronary spasm at follow-up.

Effects of high-dose atorvastatin pretreatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a cardiac magnetic resonance study.

It is uncertain that atorvastatin pretreatment can reduce myocardial damage in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of atorvastatin pretreatment on infarct size measured by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) in STEMI patients. Patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI within 12 hr after symptom onset were randomized to an atorvastatin group (n=30, 80 mg before PCI and for 5 days after PCI) or a control group (n=37, 10 mg daily after PCI). The primary end point was infarct size evaluated as the volume of delayed hyperenhancement by CE-MRI within 14 days after the index event. The median infarct size was 19% (IQR 11.1%-31.4%) in the atorvastatin group vs. 16.3% (7.2%-27.2%) in the control group (P=0.27). The myocardial salvage index (37.1% [26.9%-58.7%] vs. 46.9% [39.9-52.4], P=0.46) and area of microvascular obstruction (1.1% [0%-2.0%] vs. 0.7% [0%-1.8%], P=0.37) did not differ significantly between the groups. Frequency of the hemorrhagic and transmural infarctions was not significantly different in the 2 groups. Pretreatment with a high-dose atorvastatin followed by further treatment for 5 days in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI failed to reduce the extent of myocardial damage or improve myocardial salvage.

High-dose atorvastatin for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin on contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) occurrence in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty. METHODS: We studied whether 80  mg atorvastatin loading and its subsequent use for 5 days (high-dose group) could prevent CIN as compared to those who received 10  mg atorvastatin (regular-dose group) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty. The primary endpoint was incidence of CIN, defined as an at least 25% or at least 0.5  mg/dl increase in baseline serum creatinine within 5 days after contrast administration. The secondary endpoint was an in-hospital 1 and 6-month renal function change, and a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, renal failure requiring dialysis, heart failure, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were allocated to high dose and 108 to regular dose from August 2007 to February 2009. CIN incidence was 5.5% (6/110) in the high-dose group and 10.2% (11/108) in the regular-dose group, which is a nonsignificant difference (P = 0.193). CIN occurred significantly less in the high-dose than in the regular-dose group in subgroups of renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance ≤60  ml/min) [0% (0/28) vs. 16.7% (5/30); P = 0.024] and in the elderly patients who were at least 70 years old [4% (1/25) and 23.1% (6/26); P = 0.048]. Serum creatinine level tended to decrease in the high-dose group and increase in the regular-dose group, but the change was not statistically different (P = 0.093). The composite of clinical outcomes at 6 months was comparable in the high-dose and regular-dose groups (7.9 and 13.1%; P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: High-dose atorvastatin pretreatment does not seem to prevent CIN in patients receiving primary angioplasty. However, it has the potential to lower CIN in patients with renal insufficiency and in the elderly.

Current statin usage for patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: multicenter survey in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Although high-dose statin therapy has been reported to improve outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), patterns of statin usage for such patients have not been reported in real-world clinical practice. HYPOTHESIS: Some clinical factors would affect the pattern of statin usage in patients with ACS. METHODS: In the multicenter prospective registry, 3362 patients with ACS who underwent PCI were analyzed. High-dose statin treatment was defined as atorvastatin ≥40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥20 mg per day. The patterns of statin usage were investigated for 30 days after the index PCI. RESULTS: High-dose statins were administered prior to PCI to 13.7% and 19.6% of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) and ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), respectively (P < 0.001). After PCI, 476 (14.2%) patients were maintained on high-dose statins, and 550 (16.4%) patients received no statins. Independent factors associated with high-dose statin usage after PCI were STEMI (odds ratio [OR]: 1.704, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.321-2.197, P < 0.001), high total cholesterol level (OR: 1.445, 95% CI: 1.136-1.837, P = 0.003), and current smoker (OR: 1.556, 95% CI: 1.206-2.008, P < 0.011). The absence of hypercholesterolemia was an independent factor determining the nonuse of statins (OR: 0.229, 95% CI: 0.148-0.353, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world clinical practice, high-dose statin treatment is being underused despite extensive evidence for patients with ACS undergoing PCI, particularly in UA/NSTEMI. Efforts are needed to ensure that clinical practice complies with evidence-based guidelines.

Effects of atorvastatin pretreatment on infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Atorvastatin pretreatment has been reported to reduce myocardial damage in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to investigate the effect of atorvastatin pretreatment on infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: Patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomized to an atorvastatin group (80 mg before PCI and for 5 days after PCI [n = 89]) or a control group (10 mg daily after PCI [n = 84]). The primary end point was infarct size measured by technetium Tc 99m tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography between days 5 and 14. RESULTS: Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were not significantly different between groups except for age and current smoking status. There was no significant difference in infarct size (as a percentage of the left ventricle) between groups (22.2% ± 15.5% in the atorvastatin group vs 21.6% ± 15.4% in the control group, P = .79). The median infarct size was 19.0% (interquartile range 9.0-32.0) in the atorvastatin group and 18.0% (9.3-32.5) in the control group (P = .76). Achievement of myocardial blush grade 2/3 and complete ST-segment resolution at 60 minutes after PCI occurred with similar frequency (72.8% vs 81.9%, P = .33 and 43.2% vs 47.5%, P = .57, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with high-dose atorvastatin followed by further treatment for 5 days did not reduce infarct size measured by single-photon emission computed tomography in patients undergoing primary PCI.

Upstream high-dose tirofiban does not reduce myocardial infarct size in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a magnetic resonance imaging pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more effective than fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but initial treatment delay to intervention is the main limitation of this strategy. HYPOTHESIS: Upstream use of high-dose tirofiban could reduce myocardial infarct size, using analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI). METHODS: Patients with STEMI within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomized to a facilitated PCI group (n = 19) or to a primary PCI group (n = 20). The primary endpoint was myocardial infarct size evaluated by the volume of delayed hyperenhancement on CE-MRI at 1 month after index procedure. RESULTS: The baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Although the incidence of pre-PCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 to 3 was significantly higher in the facilitated PCI group than in the primary PCI group (47.4% vs 15.0%, P = 0.03), the achievement of myocardial blush grade 2 to 3 or ST-segment resolution at 30 minutes after procedure was not significantly different between the facilitated PCI and the primary PCI group (36.8% vs 40%, P = 0.84 and 31.6% vs 20%, P = 0.41, respectively). Infarct size on CE-MRI was similar in the facilitated PCI group and the conventional primary PCI group (22.1% +/- 11.7% vs 25.2% +/- 13.2%, P = 0.44). At 6 months, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on echocardiography was 52.6% +/- 10.4% in the facilitated PCI group and 50.9% +/- 9.8% in the primary PCI group (P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Despite the improvement of initial TIMI flow grade, the upstream use of high-dose tirofiban did not reduce myocardial infarct size measured by CE-MRI.