ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate relevant clinical outcomes following a transzonular intravitreal injection of a compounded triamcinolone-moxifloxacin-vancomycin (TMV) formulation for postoperative prophylaxis after cataract surgery in a retrospective review of medical records from a private practice, single-specialty ambulatory center in New Jersey, USA. RECENT FINDINGS: The analysis included 1541 cases from 922 patients who underwent cataract surgery with an intravitreal injection of TMV from November 2013 to December 2014. Cataract surgery was performed by a standard clear corneal phacoemulsification technique. Transzonular injection was used to deliver TMV directly into the anterior vitreous after implantation of an intraocular lens. SUMMARY: There were no major intraoperative complications associated with the transzonular injection technique. There were no cases of postoperative endophthalmitis. Nearly 92% of cases (nâ=â1413/1541) did not require supplemental medication after surgery. The rate of breakthrough inflammation at Days 14-21 was 9.2% (nâ=â132/1429). The rate of visually significant postoperative cystoid macular edema was 2.0% (nâ=â28/1429). The rate of clinically significant postoperative intraocular pressure increase was low: 0.9% (nâ=â13/1425) of cases had an at least 10âmmHg increase at Days 14-21 or 90. Four of these cases had intraocular pressure at least 30âmmHg. The rates of infection and inflammation reported in this retrospective review of a transzonular injection of TMV for prophylaxis after cataract surgery appear similar to reported rates with alternative prophylactic therapies such as topical drops. The transzonular injection of TMV may have advantages in terms of patient compliance.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Compounding , Endophthalmitis/prevention & control , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Phacoemulsification , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Drug Therapy, Combination , Endophthalmitis/etiology , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Moxifloxacin , Treatment Outcome , Triamcinolone Acetonide/therapeutic use , Vancomycin/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Aminobutyrates/pharmacology , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Disease Models, Animal , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Neprilysin/physiology , Tetrazoles/pharmacology , Alzheimer Disease/etiology , Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Animals , Biphenyl Compounds , Brain/metabolism , Drug Combinations , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Haplorhini , Humans , Mice , Neprilysin/antagonists & inhibitors , Retinal Degeneration/drug therapy , Retinal Degeneration/etiology , ValsartanSubject(s)
Choroidal Neovascularization/surgery , Macula Lutea/surgery , Macular Degeneration/surgery , Anesthesia, General/methods , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Choroidal Neovascularization/etiology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Macular Degeneration/complications , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and efficiency of retrobulbar versus sub-Tenon's capsule injection of local anesthetic in vitreoretinal surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: Sixty-four eyes from 61 patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery were randomized to receive either retrobulbar or sub-Tenon's capsule injection of 5 ml of a 50:50 mixture of 4% lidocaine and 0.75% bupivacaine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was intraoperative eye pain, which was rated by patients in both groups using an 11-point (0-10) numerical visual analogue scale immediately after surgery and again the next morning. The surgeons indicated whether they perceived patient discomfort during 4 different stages of the operation: opening of the conjunctiva, vitrectomy (if performed), placement of scleral buckle (if performed), and closing of the conjunctiva. The preincision time, need for supplemental local anesthesia, and use of IV sedation for additional pain control were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes were randomized to retrobulbar injections, and 30 eyes were randomized to sub-Tenon's capsule injections. There was no significant difference in patient-reported intraoperative pain scores between the retrobulbar and sub-Tenon's capsule groups when assessed immediately after surgery (median, 2.0 vs. 2.0; P = 0.52) or the next day (median, 2.0 vs. 1.0; P = 0.26). The surgeons reported no difference between the two groups in terms of the percentages of patients with pain during opening of the conjunctiva (20.6% vs. 3.3%; P = 0.058), vitrectomy (31% vs. 32%; P = 1.00), placement of scleral buckle (33.3% vs. 40%; P = 1.00), and closing of the conjunctiva (26.5% vs. 26.7%; P = 1.00). There was a suggestion that preincision time was longer in the sub-Tenon's capsule group. Approximately equal percentages of patients in each group required supplemental local anesthesia (38% vs. 37%; P = 0.90) or IV medication (85% vs. 70%; P = 0.14) for pain control. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-Tenon's capsule injection of local anesthetic seems as effective as retrobulbar injection at controlling intraoperative pain in vitreoretinal surgery.